ImageImageImage

Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020

Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman

Blaze4G
Pro Prospect
Posts: 861
And1: 943
Joined: May 09, 2015
 

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#21 » by Blaze4G » Thu Jul 30, 2020 3:40 am

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
themoneyteam2 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Tbf, nobody on the roster should play more than 25 minutes in these 8 games. We have nothing to play for now that HC doesn't exist. Would love to see us test line ups and different combinations.. Try Edwards and Langford with the main guys instead of the all bench line ups.. Plenty to play around with in these games if you're Brad.

we have seeding to play for though? I Wouldn't want our run to the finals to be Philly > Bucks > Raptors.
NY 567 wrote: that won't change the fact that Tatum is mediocre as hell and that Ainge is dumb enough to give average starters with no upside like Tatum and Brown max contracts. That's worse than Isiah Thomas level dumb
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 29,303
And1: 22,156
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#22 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:17 am

Blaze4G wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
themoneyteam2 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Tbf, nobody on the roster should play more than 25 minutes in these 8 games. We have nothing to play for now that HC doesn't exist. Would love to see us test line ups and different combinations.. Try Edwards and Langford with the main guys instead of the all bench line ups.. Plenty to play around with in these games if you're Brad.

we have seeding to play for though? I Wouldn't want our run to the finals to be Philly > Bucks > Raptors.


We won't catch Toronto with a 3 game lead in 8 games to play. Just don't see it happening.

At the end of the day, we have to go through Toronto and Milwaukee anyways regardless of the order. Only game I'd really play to win would be the Miami one, just to maintain the cushion we have over them for the 3rd seed, which should gst us a matchup with the Sabonis less Pacers. But it shouldn't be too difficult keeping that third seed anyways.
A new dawn will rise in Boston. ‎#StayLoyal THANK YOU TRUTH!
Blaze4G
Pro Prospect
Posts: 861
And1: 943
Joined: May 09, 2015
 

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#23 » by Blaze4G » Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:21 am

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Blaze4G wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Tbf, nobody on the roster should play more than 25 minutes in these 8 games. We have nothing to play for now that HC doesn't exist. Would love to see us test line ups and different combinations.. Try Edwards and Langford with the main guys instead of the all bench line ups.. Plenty to play around with in these games if you're Brad.

we have seeding to play for though? I Wouldn't want our run to the finals to be Philly > Bucks > Raptors.


We won't catch Toronto with a 3 game lead in 8 games to play. Just don't see it happening.

At the end of the day, we have to go through Toronto and Milwaukee anyways regardless of the order. Only game I'd really play to win would be the Miami one, just to maintain the cushion we have over them for the 3rd seed, which should gst us a matchup with the Sabonis less Pacers. But it shouldn't be too difficult keeping that third seed anyways.

Our schedule is easy though compared to the raptors. I think we could legit push for it if we wanted. However, as you mentioned, a sabonis-less pacers doesn't seem that hard so I don't mind staying in 3rd seed.
NY 567 wrote: that won't change the fact that Tatum is mediocre as hell and that Ainge is dumb enough to give average starters with no upside like Tatum and Brown max contracts. That's worse than Isiah Thomas level dumb
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,153
And1: 11,905
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#24 » by FlatearthZorro » Thu Jul 30, 2020 9:35 am

BillTheGOAT wrote:The Celtics ain’t ready yet. They’ve looked awful in all 3 games so far.


I do agree they looked rusty, but I do feel as if they weren't playing all that hard in the scrimmages. More like getting a feel for the game.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,153
And1: 11,905
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#25 » by FlatearthZorro » Thu Jul 30, 2020 9:36 am

Blaze4G wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Blaze4G wrote:we have seeding to play for though? I Wouldn't want our run to the finals to be Philly > Bucks > Raptors.


We won't catch Toronto with a 3 game lead in 8 games to play. Just don't see it happening.

At the end of the day, we have to go through Toronto and Milwaukee anyways regardless of the order. Only game I'd really play to win would be the Miami one, just to maintain the cushion we have over them for the 3rd seed, which should gst us a matchup with the Sabonis less Pacers. But it shouldn't be too difficult keeping that third seed anyways.

Our schedule is easy though compared to the raptors. I think we could legit push for it if we wanted. However, as you mentioned, a sabonis-less pacers doesn't seem that hard so I don't mind staying in 3rd seed.


Without homecourt, I don't see what the difference is, tbh. If we can just keep that 3rd seed, I'd be happy. Now if the guys wanna go hard, I'd be fine with that, too.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 46,255
And1: 53,946
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#26 » by Parliament10 » Thu Jul 30, 2020 9:50 am

FlatearthZorro wrote:
Blaze4G wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
We won't catch Toronto with a 3 game lead in 8 games to play. Just don't see it happening.

At the end of the day, we have to go through Toronto and Milwaukee anyways regardless of the order. Only game I'd really play to win would be the Miami one, just to maintain the cushion we have over them for the 3rd seed, which should gst us a matchup with the Sabonis less Pacers. But it shouldn't be too difficult keeping that third seed anyways.

Our schedule is easy though compared to the raptors. I think we could legit push for it if we wanted. However, as you mentioned, a sabonis-less pacers doesn't seem that hard so I don't mind staying in 3rd seed.


Without homecourt, I don't see what the difference is, tbh. If we can just keep that 3rd seed, I'd be happy. Now if the guys wanna go hard, I'd be fine with that, too.

No Homecourt Advantage. I don't think there's any difference.
Focus on the Playoffs. Don't focus on these 8 Seeding Games.

Use the Seeding games, strictly to get ready for this New Playoff Format.
There's No Traveling either, from city to city.
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
Triple7
RealGM
Posts: 11,007
And1: 8,437
Joined: Aug 23, 2018
 

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#27 » by Triple7 » Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:11 am

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Blaze4G wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Tbf, nobody on the roster should play more than 25 minutes in these 8 games. We have nothing to play for now that HC doesn't exist. Would love to see us test line ups and different combinations.. Try Edwards and Langford with the main guys instead of the all bench line ups.. Plenty to play around with in these games if you're Brad.

we have seeding to play for though? I Wouldn't want our run to the finals to be Philly > Bucks > Raptors.


We won't catch Toronto with a 3 game lead in 8 games to play. Just don't see it happening.

At the end of the day, we have to go through Toronto and Milwaukee anyways regardless of the order. Only game I'd really play to win would be the Miami one, just to maintain the cushion we have over them for the 3rd seed, which should gst us a matchup with the Sabonis less Pacers. But it shouldn't be too difficult keeping that third seed anyways.


I agree there no point going for 2nd, but we still have to play make sure we lock that 3rd spot down. Who knows if we get unlucky by playing it safe, miami snatches up that 3rd. We are only 2.5 games ahead. That game against the Heat would be big.
MagicBagley18
RealGM
Posts: 14,831
And1: 20,332
Joined: Feb 15, 2019
   

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#28 » by MagicBagley18 » Thu Jul 30, 2020 2:01 pm

8 game re-start goals....build up stamina, get our timing back, stay healthy, find our rhythm again. End of story
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 42,437
And1: 87,193
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#29 » by ConstableGeneva » Thu Jul 30, 2020 2:27 pm

MagicBagley18 wrote:8 game re-start goals....build up stamina, get our timing back, stay healthy, find our rhythm again. End of story

If we don't win our 18th banner in the next 8 games, I'm done with this franchise. Fire Danny!
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
tfribs45
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,598
And1: 5,015
Joined: Jul 19, 2013
     

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#30 » by tfribs45 » Thu Jul 30, 2020 3:08 pm

These 8 games should be a tune up for the playoffs, no need to crank it up all the way?! Also, WTH is up with Perkins tweet about losing Walker? Does Kendrick know something we don't? I'm shocked. nobody has mentioned it yet? Go C's!
Jaqua92
RealGM
Posts: 11,866
And1: 7,442
Joined: Feb 21, 2017
 

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#31 » by Jaqua92 » Thu Jul 30, 2020 3:51 pm

tfribs45 wrote:These 8 games should be a tune up for the playoffs, no need to crank it up all the way?! Also, WTH is up with Perkins tweet about losing Walker? Does Kendrick know something we don't? I'm shocked. nobody has mentioned it yet? Go C's!
He has a knee injury still

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#32 » by SmartWentCrazy » Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:16 pm

So is Middleton shooting 15-17 against us? Or 18-20?
themoneyteam2
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,233
And1: 8,287
Joined: Oct 19, 2019
   

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#33 » by themoneyteam2 » Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:20 pm

Read on Twitter


Pretty significant
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 42,437
And1: 87,193
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#34 » by ConstableGeneva » Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:27 pm

themoneyteam2 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Pretty significant

Not really haha. They just throw George Hill and DiVincenzo in there to replace them. Play more Korver or Sterling Brown off the bench. Bucks got depth. Bledsoe sucks against us. Hill is the one who does well against us (and Middleton of course).
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
themoneyteam2
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,233
And1: 8,287
Joined: Oct 19, 2019
   

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#35 » by themoneyteam2 » Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:31 pm

ConstableGeneva wrote:
themoneyteam2 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Pretty significant

Not really haha. They just throw George Hill and DiVincenzo in there to replace them. Play more Korver or Sterling Brown off the bench. Bucks got depth. Bledsoe sucks against us. Hill is the one who does well against us (and Middleton of course).


Yeah no doubt but still significant for them to lose their starting PG who is 1st or 2nd team all-defense.
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 42,437
And1: 87,193
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#36 » by ConstableGeneva » Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:44 pm

themoneyteam2 wrote:
ConstableGeneva wrote:
themoneyteam2 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Pretty significant

Not really haha. They just throw George Hill and DiVincenzo in there to replace them. Play more Korver or Sterling Brown off the bench. Bucks got depth. Bledsoe sucks against us. Hill is the one who does well against us (and Middleton of course).


Yeah no doubt but still significant for them to lose their starting PG who is 1st or 2nd team all-defense.

Coach Bud saw Kemba's only playing 18-20 mins and we'll have Wanamaker in his place so he decided to rest Bledsoe. For fair play.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
themoneyteam2
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,233
And1: 8,287
Joined: Oct 19, 2019
   

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#37 » by themoneyteam2 » Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:46 pm

ConstableGeneva wrote:
themoneyteam2 wrote:
ConstableGeneva wrote:Not really haha. They just throw George Hill and DiVincenzo in there to replace them. Play more Korver or Sterling Brown off the bench. Bucks got depth. Bledsoe sucks against us. Hill is the one who does well against us (and Middleton of course).


Yeah no doubt but still significant for them to lose their starting PG who is 1st or 2nd team all-defense.

Coach Bud saw Kemba's only playing 18-20 mins and we'll have Wanamaker in his place so he decided to rest Bledsoe. For fair play.


Lol true. That's the difference right there where we have Brad Wanamaker getting 20 MPG as 8th man and the Bucks have George Hill as their 8th man haha.

I'll take Boston's top 6 over any team in the East but after that the bench is horrendous.
rywith22
Sophomore
Posts: 123
And1: 159
Joined: Jul 21, 2016
     

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#38 » by rywith22 » Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:51 pm

Watching that Bucks comeback vid at the beginning of the thread just really makes me miss the garden screaming, "LET'S GO CELTICS". Ugh!!
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 42,437
And1: 87,193
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#39 » by ConstableGeneva » Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:04 pm

Read on Twitter

In the game that we won, Smart and Semi took turns somewhat successfully against him then we sent help before he got all the way to the rim. Rotate to shooters. Try to refrain from fouling him too much. Don't do dumb stuff on offense that will fuel their transition game.

I think Jaylen gets first crack. Hayward is a poor one-on-one defender. Too allergic to contact.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
GoGreen
Analyst
Posts: 3,050
And1: 3,486
Joined: Jul 19, 2017
 

Re: Celtics (43-21) vs Bucks (53-12) – 6:30PM, Fri., July 31, 2020 

Post#40 » by GoGreen » Thu Jul 30, 2020 6:30 pm

Not expecting a win. Just really hope this team fights. My biggest gripe is effort. They dig themselves into holes they think they can dig out of late in the game. It's very frustrating.

Return to Boston Celtics