Curmudgeon wrote:Jammer wrote:I have no problem with McDermott.
I do. Terrible defender who would never see the floor in Boston. Froob has it right. They've been trying to dump him with no takers. Major negative asset.
As for Turner, Theis is a better player. Smaller but better. And TimeLord protects the rim as well as Turner. If you believe in TimeLord's development, Turner is another negative asset.
I thin Ainge has a right to insist on at least one positive asset from the deal, either Warren or a pick. Alternatively, the Pacers can keep Turner and give us Oladipo or Brogdon instead.
Aware of that concern, and because of the combined salaries, I can see why Ainge prefers positive assets. My whole point is Indiana is trying to dump TWO contracts and make Boston take back too much salary. It's really an impossible situation with all their bad contracts. Do I want McDermott and Turner. Not really. It would mean they probably need to dump Langford and Edwards in the deal someplace should they want to add a player at the deadline.
And if they don't want McDermott, it means they are going to start Nesmith at SF. The lineup becomes:
PF: Tatum / Grant
SF: Brown / Nesmith
SG: Smart / Brown / Langford
PG: Walker / Pritchard (damn, these guys are small)
C: Theis / Williams III / Turner
I can see Brown seeing minutes at SG if Nesmith is the flame thrower on catch & shoots that I expect him to be.