31to6 wrote:Ernest wrote:You guys can keep telling yourselves that the size of someone's D doesn't matter, but it does, and that's why you are wrong and sad and alone.
sounds like something the cool, refreshing Goose IPA would say
It's so good.
Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman
31to6 wrote:Ernest wrote:You guys can keep telling yourselves that the size of someone's D doesn't matter, but it does, and that's why you are wrong and sad and alone.
sounds like something the cool, refreshing Goose IPA would say
Andrew McCeltic wrote:If we’re speculating about chemistry, Grant Williams sometimes looks frozen out of the offense relative to his ability..
MaxwellSmart wrote:now they tryin to make TT the escape goat.
In a vacuum it sounds nice but I agree. Pardon wouldn't move the needle enough for us when you have KD and Kyrie with depth. We would be absolute trash outside of Tatum and Harden and that just wouldn't be enoughCaptain_Caveman wrote:grindtime22 wrote:ddb wrote:
Curious to know.....Does anyone who said "heck no!" to the idea of a Brown/Smart for Harden trade earlier this year feel different now that we've seen Harden turn BK into a serious title contender? They were not that before they acquired Harden. Kyrie/Durant are incredibly talented but not too durable either. Harden has stabilized that team and is making everyone around him better. Would have been fun to see the type of impact he could have had on Boston & playing with Tatum. we think Timelord looks good now. Just imagine if he was playing with Harden.
I've always believed they were a serious title contender. They are a regular season juggernaut, but that isn't really new with Harden is it? We will see in the postseason. I like his chances much better now that he has 2 of the best closers in the game.
I have no major attachment to Brown, but I do think his value around the league is extremely high. It is probably higher than his actual impact. He is a premium young asset. If we are losing that and Smart on top of it, I still want to know if the player coming back wants to be here. I know some people view it as championship or bust, but I'm not rolling the dice if I think it is probable Harden walks at the end of the deal. If we were a true destination franchise, I would be more willing.
There is no doubt that Harden would put this team on a completely different level than our current performance. Our scrubs would not look like scrubs if Harden were delivering the ball. Timelord would look unbelievable if he had a player that was actually good at throwing the lob. Instead, we have guys that might be able to put it in the same zip code if they somehow recognize that the lob is available in the first place.
Harden was worth considering, but I ended up coming down to the realization that the following wasn't a title team:
Kemba/Pritchard
Harden/Langford
Tatum/Nesmith
Theis/GWill/Semi
RWill/Thompson
Even if you throw in PJ Tucker, or make a similar move, it's just not enough. Not this year or next. So what was the point as a go all-in to win-now trade?
MagicBagley18 wrote:I’d say smarts next contract is 17-20 range, I said 18-22 the other day but that’s probably a tad high. He’s at roughly 13 now and gonna get a raise so that starts at 16 then it depends on the market etc. a rebuilding team looking for a leader and someone to control the locker may push it to 20 & would likely over pay
Fencer reregistered wrote:Could the next thread title have a "Mad Chemist(ry)" reference?
Lol Maybe Tatum and Brown are the ones responsible for the chemistry issues.bisme37 wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:KOC and Chris Vernon are saying that this team has big chemistry issues
Specifically Tristan Thompson. Basically they make him sound like he's a partier and the locker room doesn't love him
Kinda weird to hear this because our guys recruited Thompson in the offseason. And I'd always heard he's a really hard worker, despite being on the Kardashian show and all of that.
CelticsPride18 wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:Ok so here's what Vernon/KOC said about the chemistry:
--Smart trade rumors affecting the team a bit
--Due to Covid protocol, the Celtics locker room isn't big enough to have people 6 feet apart so they basically have to have 2 locker rooms for the vets and younger guys, which hasn't helped chemistry
--Tristan is not well liked, he's already back in Covid protocol and does not stop partying
--Execs told him that they think we do get Gordon though, has no idea if Smart or Fournier will be in the deal and thinks it's more complicated than being reported
--Smart and Danny have a great relationship so if Danny is willing to trade him, that says a lot about how he feels about the team
KOC is legit but the Smart stuff bothering the team is stupid because the news broke yesterday about possibly trading him.
31to6 wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:KOC and Chris Vernon are saying that this team has big chemistry issues
Specifically Tristan Thompson. Basically they make him sound like he's a partier and the locker room doesn't love him
wait what
danvato wrote:given the Gordon/Smart rumor, do you think Celtics would trade Smart for Dinwiddie and Bruce Brown?
Andrew McCeltic wrote:On court chemistry..? He rebounds and defends well but has been a horrible fit offensively.
moonie_mcgee wrote:I'd sell on right now: Smart, Thompson, Teague and Langford
And finish the season with:
Walker/Pritchard/Waters
Brown/Nesmith/Carsen
Tatum/Upgrade/Semi
Upgrade/Upgrade/GWill
RWill/Theis/Tacko
Focus on adding 3 front court players using our sell on players.
Finish out the season.