Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman
Theocy wrote:KGtabake wrote:They really gave Robinson 100 mil.
My God.
Id take Robinson over Fournier or Smart or that bunch of plyers any day of the week but i could be a bit myopic
Parliament10 wrote:
)
Automattic wrote:Kemba buyout, Wow!
ParticleMan wrote:Automattic wrote:Kemba buyout, Wow!
imagine if we had to do that, would have destroyed our cap for 2 years. well worth a pick, plus we got al back and moses who helped get us jrich.
Automattic wrote:ParticleMan wrote:Automattic wrote:Kemba buyout, Wow!
imagine if we had to do that, would have destroyed our cap for 2 years. well worth a pick, plus we got al back and moses who helped get us jrich.
I agree. Just didn't expect it. Nor did I see the Knicks having Kemba and Fornier together for $28 m per year.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ill News wrote:Why would the Knicks want Kemba? Don't they have Derrick Rose already? Then again, the Knicks need offense badly.
Parliament10 wrote:
Parliament10 wrote:
Tyakack wrote:People can make fun of the lakers being old all they want but the only thing stopping them from winning it all this year is health.....and maybe the nets.
ParticleMan wrote:Tyakack wrote:People can make fun of the lakers being old all they want but the only thing stopping them from winning it all this year is health.....and maybe the nets.
But that’s exactly the issue with being old. I’ll be curious to see if Russ can adapt his style to fit in. If he can obviously they’ve put themselves back into serious contention. But he has never been a great off the ball player. And his value drops in the playoffs when the game becomes half court oriented. If he keeps up his Oscar Robertson pace it’s going to be at the expense of a lot of other guys on that team, and I’m not sure how big a win that is. We’ll see, definitely an intriguing experiment.
