zoyathedestroya wrote:Fierce1 wrote:It's not because Josh Richardson is not a good player, he's just not a good fit with the Celts.
In what sense? Because he's not a known shooter? Career 36% 3-pt shooter who's currently shooting better than Nesmith (and Tatum lol). Can put the ball on the floor, drive closeouts, and dish.
I think it's too early to say he's not a good fit. We do know Ime wants a more motion-oriented team. Richardson was part of and thrived on a Spo-coached team for years who's known for their player and ball movement.
After Miami, he was not impressive at all!
We all saw how average he was when the Celts swept Philly in the bubble.
Dallas dumped him after last season.
Right now Nesmith's shooting % is low because he's not getting regular playing time.
What can Nesmith do with 8.2 minutes per game?
Also, Josh Richardson is a finished product.
Nesmith and Langford will eventually end up better than Josh.
And only reason why Josh is shooting 33.3% from 3pt land is because he made 4 out of 4 against Toronto.
Other than that Toronto game, Josh is just 2-11 from 3pt land, that's 18.2%.
Again, he's not a bad player, he's just not a good fit.