Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Andrew McCeltic (227)
Larry_Russell (199)
Curmudgeon (163)
CelticFaninLBC (116)
Celts17Pride (104)
The Comedian (102)
playa-hater (69)
GoCeltics123 (63)
ddb (52)
MagicBagley18 (48)
chrisab123 (46)
zoyathedestroya (42)
cl2117 (40)
Jaqua92 (34)
Bohemian (34)
GoGreen (32)
BK_2020 (29)
Fencer reregistered (27)
fallguy (24)
Hal14 (22)
Larry_Russell wrote:5 year 240 million for Beal?
SCrew That.
28, looking slower, not a great defender, shooting below 30% from 3,
Whoever gives Beal that contract will regret it for a decade.
GoCeltics123 wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:5 year 240 million for Beal?
SCrew That.
28, looking slower, not a great defender, shooting below 30% from 3,
Whoever gives Beal that contract will regret it for a decade.
If Beal came here, we wouldn't be paying him that. It would be less for us.
For those who're wondering what he's talking about:
Fencer reregistered wrote:Does anybody know whether Jaylen's All-Star incentive is paid if he's an injury replacement? That could actually matter to our trade strategy, given that Durant seems like a starting lock who is however injured, and LaVine is injured as well.
keevsnick1 wrote:Beal's contract with Boston would come in at around 4 years 180 million. It depends on exactly where next year's cap comes in.
We know. I've just liked it less and less as time goes on, particularly with how bad of a shooter he's been this yearMagicBagley18 wrote:Beal thing isn’t news guys- like comedian said that’s why he didn’t extend already. At the end of the year he’s eligible for the 10 year vet contract.
It’s also cheaper for us and again not to be a dick or a broken record but it doesn’t matter if we think we should pay that or not.........if he is willing to come we will because Tatum wants him.
Smart may not be here.Larry_Russell wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:5 year 240 million for Beal?
SCrew That.
28, looking slower, not a great defender, shooting below 30% from 3,
Whoever gives Beal that contract will regret it for a decade.
If Beal came here, we wouldn't be paying him that. It would be less for us.
For those who're wondering what he's talking about:
How much less per season?
I think its like 40 million X 4 years
We would need him to give a nice fat discount to want to play with Tatum.
Horford 27 million
RIchardson 11 million
Romeo 5 million
Would match the salaries
Smart
Beal
Brown
Tatum
TImelord
Bohemian wrote:keevsnick1 wrote:Beal's contract with Boston would come in at around 4 years 180 million. It depends on exactly where next year's cap comes in.
Wow, that´s a lot of money...
bisme37 wrote:The thing I like about Beal's game is how he's always in attack mode and makes quick decisions with the ball. He's not just a jump shooter. He makes the right pass and attacks the rim and doesn't hold the ball while making decisions. That kind of play would be great for us.
If you can somehow add him while keeping both Jays, that's a massive win. But if you have to move Jaylen it's only a marginal upgrade imo. And my inner debate is... is a marginal upgrade worth all that money?
Two sources told Action Network that Bradley Beal’s interest in being relocated has cooled even further. There was some thought that if the Wizards‘ season went sideways he might ask out, but the Wizards have stabilized after a hot start and big downturn. There’s a belief that Beal is focused on maximizing his next contract which is easiest in Washington.