Boston Incoming
Jason Kidd
Chicago Incoming
Ray Allen
New Jersey Incoming
Kirk Hinrich
Tony Allen
Joe Smith
Viktor Khryapa
Bos/Chi/NJ trade idea
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Bos/Chi/NJ trade idea
-
hiphop1
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,086
- And1: 32
- Joined: Aug 08, 2005
- Location: hudson nh
Bos/Chi/NJ trade idea
Free your mind and your a** will follow
-
daveisceltics
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,457
- And1: 517
- Joined: Jun 30, 2006
- Location: South Boston
-
-
hiphop1
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,086
- And1: 32
- Joined: Aug 08, 2005
- Location: hudson nh
CelticsWhat! wrote:How does that help Chicago?
They need a allstar scorer bad. Ray is still an allstar player he is just not adjusting well to being the third wheel. We also keep Rondo. All the alley oops to KG would be Amazing and Kidd finding PP on the break. It would work like clockwork for us. Plus Kidd and Ainge have a very close relationship going back to their Sun's days.
Free your mind and your a** will follow
-
CelticsWhat!
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 884
- And1: 1
- Joined: May 22, 2003
- Location: I'll be where I'm at!!
hiphop1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
They need a allstar scorer bad. Ray is still an allstar player he is just not adjusting well to being the third wheel. We also keep Rondo. All the alley oops to KG would be Amazing and Kidd finding PP on the break. It would work like clockwork for us. Plus Kidd and Ainge have a very close relationship going back to their Sun's days.
No, they need a low-post scoring big man bad, and with that trade, they're getting rid of their best in that department, not to mention their starting point guard.
"If you drop a phonograph needle on Brasky's nipple, it plays the Beach Boys' 'Pet Sounds.'"
-
hiphop1
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,086
- And1: 32
- Joined: Aug 08, 2005
- Location: hudson nh
CelticsWhat! wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
No, they need a low-post scoring big man bad, and with that trade, they're getting rid of their best in that department, not to mention their starting point guard.
They could then turn around and trad Gordon and Thomas for some low post scoring.
Free your mind and your a** will follow
-
MVP16
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,342
- And1: 3
- Joined: Mar 05, 2006
hiphop1 wrote:I would do this in a heartbeat and you guys are CRAZY not to. Plus we cut a year off of Allens contract and Kidd's is a max deal. We want to win NOW and this does that hands down.
Aren't we already winning now? We do have the best record in the league by a pretty good margin right now.
And we have 2 sgs on our roster right now, who you trade for a pg. So who is going to play sg for us? Pierce and Posey would be our only wings left and they are both better suited playing sf.
-
sully00
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 28,105
- And1: 7,738
- Joined: Jan 08, 2004
- Location: Providence, RI
-
Not for nothing but NJ sucks and one of the primary reasons is that Kidd isn't playing very well. FG% and scoring are down and turnovers are up.
Essentially we are trading Ray Allen and Rondo's production for Jason Kidd and Tony Allen's in the starting line up. I think you are going to end up with a lot less scoring more rebounds and assists and twice as many turnovers.
Beyond that it will disrupt what is working so well right now. We aren't having a problem getting Paul and KG the ball if you make this move you are allowing defenses to collapse on the post. The counter is to go with Eddie over Tony so then you get the shooting but lose the rebounding, assists and defense.
It isn't going to happen but even in fantasy senario I don't know that you would want it to.
Essentially we are trading Ray Allen and Rondo's production for Jason Kidd and Tony Allen's in the starting line up. I think you are going to end up with a lot less scoring more rebounds and assists and twice as many turnovers.
Beyond that it will disrupt what is working so well right now. We aren't having a problem getting Paul and KG the ball if you make this move you are allowing defenses to collapse on the post. The counter is to go with Eddie over Tony so then you get the shooting but lose the rebounding, assists and defense.
It isn't going to happen but even in fantasy senario I don't know that you would want it to.
-
theman
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,541
- And1: 1,432
- Joined: May 23, 2001
sully00 wrote:Not for nothing but NJ sucks and one of the primary reasons is that Kidd isn't playing very well. FG% and scoring are down and turnovers are up.
Sully you are usually spot on, but most people think Kidd is having one of his best seasons ever.
'At the beginning of a dynasty, taxation yields large revenues from small assessments. At the end of a dynasty, taxation yields small revenues from large assessments'. - Ibn Khaldun
-
daveisceltics
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,457
- And1: 517
- Joined: Jun 30, 2006
- Location: South Boston
-
-
hiphop1
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,086
- And1: 32
- Joined: Aug 08, 2005
- Location: hudson nh
MVP16 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Aren't we already winning now? We do have the best record in the league by a pretty good margin right now.
And we have 2 sgs on our roster right now, who you trade for a pg. So who is going to play sg for us? Pierce and Posey would be our only wings left and they are both better suited playing sf.
Our other backcourt would be Rondo and House. House plays the two alot anyway.
Free your mind and your a** will follow
-
BobbySura
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,415
- And1: 342
- Joined: Dec 31, 2005
hiphop1 wrote:Then maybe the Bulls can pull something like this off
Chicago Incoming
Gasol
Lowry
Memphis Incoming
Nocioni
Ty Thomas
Ben Gordon
Wallace
Gasol
Deng
Ray Allen
Kyle Lowry
so chicago does this to end up with..no bench and a pg rotation of kyle lowry and chris duhon??O_O
not to mention boston ends up with uh..eddie house starting sg?
kidd would probably be a better fit on this team than ray.
but kidd is not going to fall out of the sky and we can't afford to give much more than allen for kidd straight up, allen+pruitt, allen+powe or allen+scala