Page 1 of 3
Is Pierce "Rafter-Jersey" good?
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:24 pm
by TheSheriff
If Pierce retired tomorrow, would he have accomplished enough to have his 34 raised to the rafters?
This all comes up because, as i watch the Celtics on ABC Van Gundy says, "Paul Pierce has not done enough to have his number retired... he is not jersey in the rafter good."
I usually like Van Gundy, but in this case he completely off base.
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:29 pm
by grantlongforpresident
Pierce will have his Jersey retired!
but if he retired today? idk. kind of pointless since he is mid-career.
he is almost there though.
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:29 pm
by grantlongforpresident
ps your quote makes no sense, if you are going to quote someone don't quote it wrong.
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:32 pm
by TommyPoints
No player will ever wear 34 again. At least not without asking Pierce for permission first.
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:51 pm
by Mateen Cleaves
If he stays with the Celtics the rest of his career then yes he will.
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:56 pm
by basketball royalty
Mark Jackson is right, Jeff Van Gundy is wrong.
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:56 pm
by kampalot
yes
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:58 pm
by daveisceltics
He's obviously getting his jersey retired.
He could retire after this season it wouldn't matter.
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:07 pm
by The Rondo Show
Absolutely.
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:15 pm
by screwedupmaniac
paul pierce: absolutely yes! and if we win banner 17, i fully expect to see numbers 5 and 20 hanging next to 34 as well.
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:16 pm
by jjwalker
no
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:36 pm
by Falstaff
jjwalker wrote:no
Care to elaborate?
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:38 pm
by Pats19andO
Yes he would
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:03 pm
by NYK3
Pats19andO wrote:Yes he would
Warning for trolling. canman
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:28 pm
by Spin Move
Falstaff wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Care to elaborate?
No
jk.....I disagree he is already top 6 has played for the team like 10 years and has been the best player hear the vast majority of it, to use an analogy from a hated rival Pierce pre KG was like Don Mattingly, things didnt go quite as planned but he was the lone bright spot in a sad era and the good things that did happen were pretty much the result of his hard work. He has earned a place in the team HOF the real HOF he needs a title or two, but as far as the celts go, he has been one of the only reasons to watch them most of his career and to me even though he didnt win titles near the start of his career he has earned it he should be one of the teams top 5 all time scorers by seasons end.
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:14 pm
by jjwalker
#2 Red
#6 Russell
#14 Cousy
#15 Heinsohn
#17 Havlicek
#18 Cowens
#33 Bird
All other numbers should come down and their names should be honored in a
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:33 pm
by campybatman
Are Reggie Lewis' all-time numbers in a Celtics uniform better than Paul Pierce? I'm just asking... Because I would retire Pierce's jersey based on his all-time numbers in a Celtics uniform. And I believe Paul will retire as a Celtic. But, he'll have to accept a lesser salary to remain in Boston beyond his current deal. If not, he'll go the Robert Parrish way: Played for other franchises before having his number retired for Boston.
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 11:07 pm
by Red2
are there any players with retired numbers who DIDN't win a chmapionship? I can't think of one except maybe Jungle Jim Loscutoff .
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 11:43 pm
by ARB729
Yes, and Pierce will be the only Celtics number to be retired for a long time to come.
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:12 am
by AWalkerREMIX
Jeff Van Gundy knows nothing of:
A. Good talent
B. The city of Boston
C. The Celtics' organization
Paul Pierce is a lock to have his number retired