NY/Bos trade idea

[kakopedi1]

To NY
Perkins, Scal, TAllen, Pollard& BigBaby

To Boston
Curry & Lee

For NY they cut salary(Curry) and good cheap defensive players in Perk, TAllen & Baby.

For Boston, Curry & Lee would great next to KG.

[Datruth345]

no no no no no no no no no no no no no

no a few more time for good measure

[greenbeans]

if there was never a thing called chemistry then yes, im all for it.

[Wrighteous]

LOL the Knicks aren't giving up Lee for 5 scrubs.

[SuperDeluxe]

LOL the Knicks aren't giving up Lee for 5 scrubs.

The Celtics woudn't even give Scalabrine for Curry (unless, of course, the Knicks send money considerations to pay for the extra hamburgers).

[IVSKIN]

as soon as I saw Bos/NYK trade idea, I dismissed it.

[greenbeans]

LOL the Knicks aren't giving up Lee for 5 scrubs.

hey, its the D-bag troll who knows nothing. thanks for showing up guy

[Falstaff]

Wow. No.


Allen gives us really good wing defense. Perk gives us interior defense. Baby is a good backup big who takes up space and just played excellent d on Duncan.

Curry is terrible. Lee is good. But we lose depth here and disrupt the team.

[chakdaddy]

Knicks wouldn't do that, and I don't think it work would great for Boston either.

[Joyeuse]

On offense, our star players will get the ball. On defense, everyone's important. We can't afford to sacrifice our defense for some offense-oriented players who won't even see the ball.

[Andrew McCeltic]

sometimes people say things like 'i just threw up in my mouth a little.' i never knew what that was like til now

[EvadedHavoc]

David Lee and a Bag of Lard for 5 players? Helll No.

[GreenGrizz]

I am not familiar with those Knicks but I believe Gabe Pruitt is the player that can make them a better team. They need a decent big point guard. I wouldn't trade him for Nate Robinson.

[lojowo]

Talent wise, it would be an upgrade for the Celtics Frontcourt.

Would it make the Celtics a better team? I doubt it.

Celtics currently IMO cant fnd enough shoots for Allen, Garnett and Pierce, but if you add Curry ( who only true asset is scoring ) these number will go down.

I love Lee, I think he would fit in fine here.

I think you give up way too much defensively to do this deal.

Plus I think we will have the same issue that the Knicks have, too many good players who think they should be the number 1 option and not enough role players.

After this deal, I would beleive though the Celtics condensed their 5 good role players into 2 excellent front court players, that the Celtics winning percentage would go down and the Knicks winning percentage would increase because the Knicks would receive 5 players who would not need the ball as much and allow Randolph, Crawford, etc do there thing.

[AWalkerREMIX]

Oh God, no. Awful deal. We like defense, let's keep it that way. Curry and Lee are both awful defenders/

[BobbySura]

rebounding drops and our thin bench gets thinner

no lol

[RondoGreen9]

Absolutelly not, we're not trading our players to the worst team in the league/our rivals/people in the same division.

[kakopedi1]

Wow. Thats an overwhelming NO from most/all posters, and I guess understandbly so, we lose our defense but gain Rebounds and better post offense from Curry.

I LOVE our team as is, but I wanted to see what you guys thought of a KG/Curry/Lee/Powe frontline. I dont think it would've been all that bad, esp if we pick a vet pg like Cassell.

[theman]

Oh God, no. Awful deal. We like defense, let's keep it that way. Curry and Lee are both awful defenders/

I thought Lee was a desent defender. I hate the deal but...

Wow. Thats an overwhelming NO from most/all posters, and I guess understandbly so, we lose our defense but gain Rebounds and better post offense from Curry.

I LOVE our team as is, but I wanted to see what you guys thought of a KG/Curry/Lee/Powe frontline. I dont think it would've been all that bad, esp if we pick a vet pg like Cassell.

I thought for sure you were a Knicks fan.

[3pt %]

Curry is the ultimate 'should be player'. Too bad he just isn't.