RealGM

To be a rivalry, does the match up have to be competitive? For example, Paul has completely owned Q-Bitch his whole career. He gets the best of Q-Bitch every time he faces him, but yet the two seem to have a

Bird and Chuck Person? Does that apply?

There is no rivalry between Paul Pierce and Q-Trash.

Q-Trash sucks. He's utter trash.

And, as it happens, Q-Trash has issues with Paul Pierce consistently outplaying him,
and exposing Q-Trash's game as the equal of his trash talking mouth.

So, Q-Trash has issues with Pierce's superior play.

Q-Trash doesn't like to be shown up.

So, Q-Trash's strategy is to try to entice Paul Pierce into a fight.

It won't make Q-Trash play any better, but it just might get Paul Pierce off the court.

Man, Q-bitch is fat ...

Jammer, I think you missed the point of this thread. Addittionally, I think its important that we stay consistent with nicknames. Q-Bitch.

also, I think Bird and Person is another great example.

on the minus said for us, Lebron has owned Paul in recent matchups (probabbly ever since Paul dropped 50 on him and we still managed to lose)

Jammer wrote:There is no rivalry between Paul Pierce and Q-Trash.

Q-Trash sucks. He's utter trash.

And, as it happens, Q-Trash has issues with Paul Pierce consistently outplaying him,
and exposing Q-Trash's game as the equal of his trash talking mouth.

So, Q-Trash has issues with Pierce's superior play.

Q-Trash doesn't like to be shown up.

So, Q-Trash's strategy is to try to entice Paul Pierce into a fight.

It won't make Q-Trash play any better, but it just might get Paul Pierce off the court.

XTC vs Adam Ant, content vs form.