ImageImageImage

For The Love of God...No Posey at PF!!!!

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
billfromBoston
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,557
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 14, 2003

For The Love of God...No Posey at PF!!!! 

Post#1 » by billfromBoston » Sat Mar 1, 2008 3:10 am

...I thought we were past this with the emergence of Powe/Davis as consistent contributors...

When Posey is at the 4 spot this team turns into an entirely perimeter oriented attack...when the 17-25 foot shots aren't falling the team becomes offensively (Please Use More Appropriate Word) and basically has to prevent the other team from scoring at all in order to win the game...

The team went about 6-7 minutes in the 4th completely lacking any type of offensive aptitude...it turned an easy game into a nail-biter because the team had ZERO offense...

While this lineup has has limited success in the past it has been an offensive failure far more often than its been a success and that is consistent with the shooting averages that come with perimeter attacks...

No easy baskets, not cuts to the hoop or pick-and-roll and absolutely no 2nd chance points or offensive rebounds to speak of...

Doc takes a lot of criticism, but he usually gets it right eventually...I just thought we were past this little experiment...if he wants to try it for 2-3 minutes to see if its working that's fine, but for the love of god, don't piss away the bulk of the 4th quarter waiting for it to happen...

THIS IS NOT AN EFFECTIVE LINEUP!!!
User avatar
TommyPoints
General Manager
Posts: 7,559
And1: 4,250
Joined: Feb 14, 2006
Location: Spurs of the East
 

 

Post#2 » by TommyPoints » Sat Mar 1, 2008 3:14 am

Thank you! Now someone tell this to Doc, please.
Image
User avatar
canman1971
Senior Mod - Celtics
Senior Mod - Celtics
Posts: 14,949
And1: 8,991
Joined: May 13, 2003
Location: 18 Championship BLVD
       

 

Post#3 » by canman1971 » Sat Mar 1, 2008 3:14 am

I agree. I do think those days will be over though with the addition of Brown. I was wondering why he didn't go back to Perk as well? If you are going to have guys shooting the long ball, you need rebounding from guys like Davis, Powe and Perk. Garnett cannot do it all by himself.
PPAW4Life
Banned User
Posts: 1,546
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 23, 2007

 

Post#4 » by PPAW4Life » Sat Mar 1, 2008 3:21 am

I think Posey playing the 4 is ok as long as the opposing team is not larger.
BillessuR6
General Manager
Posts: 8,786
And1: 2,614
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
 

 

Post#5 » by BillessuR6 » Sat Mar 1, 2008 3:28 am

I HATE small ball!

Rivers is going to kill me with his stupid decision making! Perk plays a great game and then Doc sits him in the fourth. And Pierce who was the worst player in the game plays 40+ minutes... :crazy:
User avatar
cisco
Veteran
Posts: 2,738
And1: 48
Joined: Nov 14, 2005

 

Post#6 » by cisco » Sat Mar 1, 2008 3:28 am

I totally agree with the OP. I hate small ball and always have, especially at the end of games. We need a rebounder in the game down the stretch.

I also agree with Tommy Heinson that at the end of the 4th quarter in a close game, you cannot resort to shooting jumpers (especially with Posey in the game because they don't usually get the offensive rebound in case of a miss). They need to get the ball to KG in the paint or let PP or Rondo drive to the hoop and finish or dish. Going small and shooting all those jumpers in the 4th almost cost them the game. Good thing Doc finally put Perk back in with just over 2 minutes left in the game.
leper-con
General Manager
Posts: 8,968
And1: 4,203
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Centre Court

 

Post#7 » by leper-con » Sat Mar 1, 2008 3:43 am

I hate to say it but he offense has been the problem all year long.
It has become evident to me that we need a centre who can score on the low block. Everyone on this team is perimeter oriented, except the two rookies and do you really want to reley on Powe and Baby to go deep into the play offs????
Rocky5000
Analyst
Posts: 3,386
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2008

 

Post#8 » by Rocky5000 » Sat Mar 1, 2008 3:44 am

definitely agree. Powe and Davis are the only guys off from the bench who go to work inside, we need at least one of them in the game when Perk is on the bench. The game was slipping away tonight until Perk came back in for Posey.
User avatar
Datruth345
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,903
And1: 442
Joined: Nov 25, 2005
 

 

Post#9 » by Datruth345 » Sat Mar 1, 2008 3:49 am

couldnt agree more
"...That, Mr. James, is etched in stone.” - Bill Russell
User avatar
dwestside
Rookie
Posts: 1,214
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Location: Foxboro

 

Post#10 » by dwestside » Sat Mar 1, 2008 4:20 am

Agreed. Absolutely zero interior scoring and very little rebounding. It's no secret the offense becomes stagnant, and no second chance points with Posey playing the 4. I can't figure out why he does it, especially when Davis, Powe AND Perk were ALL playing great. Take your pick Doc. Today, any of them would have been fine.
Image
User avatar
dwestside
Rookie
Posts: 1,214
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Location: Foxboro

 

Post#11 » by dwestside » Sat Mar 1, 2008 4:24 am

leper-con wrote:I hate to say it but he offense has been the problem all year long.
It has become evident to me that we need a centre who can score on the low block. Everyone on this team is perimeter oriented, except the two rookies and do you really want to reley on Powe and Baby to go deep into the play offs????


I don't think we need a pure post scorer per-say, because both Powe and Davis are such effective rebounders. They also are good finishers, so they keep interior defenses honest. Plus with KG being such a phenomenal passer at the high post, interior passes to Powe, Baby, and Perk make for high percentage shots on their own, without the need for much creating.

Besides all that though ... who exactly was the low block scorer available that you'd hoped the C's would pick up?
Image
threrf23
RealGM
Posts: 15,020
And1: 4,962
Joined: Mar 22, 2004

 

Post#12 » by threrf23 » Sat Mar 1, 2008 6:21 am

For the most part I'd rather Posey @ PF than Scot Pollard PJ Brown or Scal in the game.

I don't like Posey @ PF so much with PP & Ray in the game except in occasional circumstances based on matchups. Posey @ PF should also ideally have TA defending a wing IMO.

I strongly dislike a Posey/PP/Ray/House lineup, regardless of the C
s1ickd
Veteran
Posts: 2,628
And1: 247
Joined: Jul 26, 2006

 

Post#13 » by s1ickd » Sat Mar 1, 2008 7:43 am

pure talent wise, posey at the 4 is our best lineup. problem is, it physically doesnt work all the time. i think its a good idea for maybe 5-7 mins a game where you think you could pull ahead with it offensively. otherwise, put something more conventional out there.
Relative Autonomy
Senior
Posts: 528
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 15, 2006

 

Post#14 » by Relative Autonomy » Sat Mar 1, 2008 12:14 pm

this lineup is ineffective. small ball does not seem to be something that works well with this team. the only time posey should be at the four spot is when we are playing the suns or some other team that goes small on.
Relative Autonomy
Senior
Posts: 528
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 15, 2006

 

Post#15 » by Relative Autonomy » Sat Mar 1, 2008 12:17 pm

leper-con wrote:I hate to say it but he offense has been the problem all year long.
It has become evident to me that we need a centre who can score on the low block. Everyone on this team is perimeter oriented, except the two rookies and do you really want to reley on Powe and Baby to go deep into the play offs????


garnett could finally start playing down low more and using his quickness to his advantage. that is what i would like to see. his fadeway out of the post is far and way the most reliable way for this team to get a bucket in the post.
LongTimeFan
Analyst
Posts: 3,227
And1: 292
Joined: Jul 17, 2003

 

Post#16 » by LongTimeFan » Sat Mar 1, 2008 12:35 pm

Do you think Doc may have been managing an injury issue?

Anyways I'm glad to see Perk doing well, and Powe.
User avatar
Barry Lird
Junior
Posts: 314
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 20, 2007

 

Post#17 » by Barry Lird » Sat Mar 1, 2008 1:07 pm

Could not agree more, Bill. Was even going to make a post about it, too.

What an ineffective lineup. I won't rehash what you've already capably laid out, but jeez, if we all could see that, what the hell is wrong with Doc?

He took what should have been an easy win and turned it into a tight game down the stretch.

As somebody already pointed out, thank god noodlenoggin finally inserted Perk back in with around 2 minutes to go.
Tenbomber
Banned User
Posts: 6,073
And1: 989
Joined: Apr 26, 2005

 

Post#18 » by Tenbomber » Sat Mar 1, 2008 2:02 pm

CelticGamecock wrote:Thank you! Now someone tell this to Doc, please.


I've been saying smallball sucks in crunchtime for two seasons now...

nobody listened...

Even Heinson was upset with Doc last night...you could hear it in his voice!
elrod enchilada
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,729
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 19, 2004
Location: Land of Lincoln
Contact:

 

Post#19 » by elrod enchilada » Sat Mar 1, 2008 2:20 pm

Bill nailed it.

The fact is, Leon and Big Baby are very positive assets when on the floor, especially Leon. We need to have two of KG, Perk, BB and Leon on the floor at almost all times. PJ Brown may get added to that list. We'll see what sort of game he has left.

While no one was looking, look who became the second highest PER guy on the Cs?

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/hollinge ... ateChanged
Tenbomber
Banned User
Posts: 6,073
And1: 989
Joined: Apr 26, 2005

 

Post#20 » by Tenbomber » Sat Mar 1, 2008 2:29 pm

elrod enchilada wrote:While no one was looking, look who became the second highest PER guy on the Cs?


Nice company for "Neon Leon"! :)

Return to Boston Celtics