Celtic-Hornets 3/22/08 PostGame Thread
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:12 am
********** Celtics ********** Hornets
Turnovers ** 20 *************** 9
Steals ****** 4 ************** 13 (Bonzi Wells 8 )
Field Goals 41-74 (55.4%) ***** 39-77 (50.6%)
3 Pt. FG's * 7-21 (33%) ******* 10-23 (43.5%)
Rebounds *** 44 ************** 29
Personal Fouls 26 ************** 21
Free Throws 17-22 (77.3%) ***** 25-29 (86.2%)
It would seem that the difference is this game is possessions, 3 point shooting and free throws:
1. The Hornets made 11 less turnovers (9 vs. 20), and committed 5 fewer fouls (21 vs. 26).
That is 11+5= 16 additional possessions for the Hornets, offsetting the Celtics 15 additional rebounds (44 vs. 29).
2. The Hornets shot the lights out from 3 point land (10-23 vs. the Celtics 7-21).
3. Though easily overlooked, the Hornets had a 8 point advantage at the
free throw line (25-29 vs. 17-21).
As for what the Celtics could have done differently to win this game, it comes down to 3 things, I think.
First, commit fewer turnovers (20 vs. 9 is a big possession difference).
Second, someone should have been given the task of playing man to man on David West from the get go. Denying the entry pass is the biggest part of good defense, that and simply positioning. This was completely lacking, and a zone defense doesn't shut this down, great man to man defense does. David West is not someone who should score 35 points against the Celtics. Between Powe, Garnett, Pierce and Posey; one of these guys should have been tasked to get it done. This is something I place on Doc's shoulders. No matter what, one of these four should have been able to take West out of his game. Your mission, if you choose to accept the assignment, is to not let him catch the ball in a scoring position. If the Celtics are the great defensive team that they like to think that they are, their coaching staff should have adjusted for West in the first two minutes of the game.
Third, when someone is hot, like Ray Allen in the first half, to only get him 7 shots in the half (5-7) is a mistake. It's just a mistake. That he went 1-5 in the second half to end up 6-12 obfuscates the fact that when he had his stroke, he should have had more shots. This has been a problem all year, from day one.
Turnovers ** 20 *************** 9
Steals ****** 4 ************** 13 (Bonzi Wells 8 )
Field Goals 41-74 (55.4%) ***** 39-77 (50.6%)
3 Pt. FG's * 7-21 (33%) ******* 10-23 (43.5%)
Rebounds *** 44 ************** 29
Personal Fouls 26 ************** 21
Free Throws 17-22 (77.3%) ***** 25-29 (86.2%)
It would seem that the difference is this game is possessions, 3 point shooting and free throws:
1. The Hornets made 11 less turnovers (9 vs. 20), and committed 5 fewer fouls (21 vs. 26).
That is 11+5= 16 additional possessions for the Hornets, offsetting the Celtics 15 additional rebounds (44 vs. 29).
2. The Hornets shot the lights out from 3 point land (10-23 vs. the Celtics 7-21).
3. Though easily overlooked, the Hornets had a 8 point advantage at the
free throw line (25-29 vs. 17-21).
As for what the Celtics could have done differently to win this game, it comes down to 3 things, I think.
First, commit fewer turnovers (20 vs. 9 is a big possession difference).
Second, someone should have been given the task of playing man to man on David West from the get go. Denying the entry pass is the biggest part of good defense, that and simply positioning. This was completely lacking, and a zone defense doesn't shut this down, great man to man defense does. David West is not someone who should score 35 points against the Celtics. Between Powe, Garnett, Pierce and Posey; one of these guys should have been tasked to get it done. This is something I place on Doc's shoulders. No matter what, one of these four should have been able to take West out of his game. Your mission, if you choose to accept the assignment, is to not let him catch the ball in a scoring position. If the Celtics are the great defensive team that they like to think that they are, their coaching staff should have adjusted for West in the first two minutes of the game.
Third, when someone is hot, like Ray Allen in the first half, to only get him 7 shots in the half (5-7) is a mistake. It's just a mistake. That he went 1-5 in the second half to end up 6-12 obfuscates the fact that when he had his stroke, he should have had more shots. This has been a problem all year, from day one.