Doc has Changed the Recipe - Go Back to Eddie & Tony
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:26 am
The premise of this post is the use of the 5 guards on the Celtics.
I have been pretty consistent in a view, that worked for almost the entire season, that has now been modified by Doc Rivers.
Doc, pre-Sam Cassell, played a very straight starter/backup rotation of
Rajon Rondo/Eddie House at point guard and
Ray Allen/Tony Allen at shooting guard.
House had the best season of his career, playing like a team player and point guard, while providing 7.5 ppg off the bench in 19 mpg.
Tony Allen provided 6.6 ppg in 18 minutes.
House's numbers are inflated by probably 2 minutes per game due to injuries to Rondo and Ray Allen, and Tony's are probably inflated by 8 mpg.
My fear when Sam Cassell was brought in was that instead of being a 5th guard, subbing for House or Tony Allen at either PG or SG on days when one of Rondo, House, Ray Allen or Tony Allen WERE OFF,
was that Doc would elevate Sam over Eddie/Tony and disrupt the chemistry that had worked for an entire season.
That is exactly what has happened not only the last two games, but also late in the season.
The rotation of the guards has completely been altered, and what worked is gone.
House doesn't play like the old House, he tries to be a point guard.
When he was first in line, he was a point guard AND shooter. I still think that House should be the first PG off the bench, with Sam as the last resort, where at that point it won't matter if Sam's shot isn't falling, since their is no one else to turn.
I can't believe that Danny or Doc would have made any concessions to loud mouth Sam, whose incessant "I'm the backup point guard" talk the minute he arrived I thought was complete BS until he earned it. He never earned it, but was given it, and therein, I submit, lies the problem.
Ditto for SG, where Tony's solid Defense, rebounding, and ability to make things happen worked great on his good days. Again, if he's off, then use Sam.
The Celtics deprived themselves of this the past two games, and will never know if they could have pulled out the last game (I think definately) and the prior game (I think Possibly) had they stuck to the original formula, and used Sam as a 5th guard, and not the first guy off the bench, since in my book he never beat out Eddie or Tony.
Well, I've said my piece.
I know Sam has a lot of lovers on this board, but I felt this way before he arrived.
I have been pretty consistent in a view, that worked for almost the entire season, that has now been modified by Doc Rivers.
Doc, pre-Sam Cassell, played a very straight starter/backup rotation of
Rajon Rondo/Eddie House at point guard and
Ray Allen/Tony Allen at shooting guard.
House had the best season of his career, playing like a team player and point guard, while providing 7.5 ppg off the bench in 19 mpg.
Tony Allen provided 6.6 ppg in 18 minutes.
House's numbers are inflated by probably 2 minutes per game due to injuries to Rondo and Ray Allen, and Tony's are probably inflated by 8 mpg.
My fear when Sam Cassell was brought in was that instead of being a 5th guard, subbing for House or Tony Allen at either PG or SG on days when one of Rondo, House, Ray Allen or Tony Allen WERE OFF,
was that Doc would elevate Sam over Eddie/Tony and disrupt the chemistry that had worked for an entire season.
That is exactly what has happened not only the last two games, but also late in the season.
The rotation of the guards has completely been altered, and what worked is gone.
House doesn't play like the old House, he tries to be a point guard.
When he was first in line, he was a point guard AND shooter. I still think that House should be the first PG off the bench, with Sam as the last resort, where at that point it won't matter if Sam's shot isn't falling, since their is no one else to turn.
I can't believe that Danny or Doc would have made any concessions to loud mouth Sam, whose incessant "I'm the backup point guard" talk the minute he arrived I thought was complete BS until he earned it. He never earned it, but was given it, and therein, I submit, lies the problem.
Ditto for SG, where Tony's solid Defense, rebounding, and ability to make things happen worked great on his good days. Again, if he's off, then use Sam.
The Celtics deprived themselves of this the past two games, and will never know if they could have pulled out the last game (I think definately) and the prior game (I think Possibly) had they stuck to the original formula, and used Sam as a 5th guard, and not the first guy off the bench, since in my book he never beat out Eddie or Tony.
Well, I've said my piece.
I know Sam has a lot of lovers on this board, but I felt this way before he arrived.