Hawks in 6!

Dick and Bush 2004 · Post #1 » by **Dick and Bush 2004** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:42 am

I am predicting this for the third time. maybe this thread will stay. as a reminder of how some here gave the hawks no chance.

Danny Ainge · Post #2 » by **Danny Ainge** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:43 am

this thread better stay or i will be upset.

Dick and Bush 2004 · Post #3 » by **Dick and Bush 2004** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:44 am

Dick and Bush 2004 wrote:I am predicting this for the third time. maybe this thread will stay. as a reminder of how some here gave the hawks no chance.

you are bugging celts will win in 6

Dick and Bush 2004 · Post #4 » by **Dick and Bush 2004** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:45 am

no way....hawks have more speed, a better starting 5(bench blows though)

more power in the paint!

Dick and Bush 2004 · Post #5 » by **Dick and Bush 2004** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:46 am

Dick and Bush 2004 wrote:no way....hawks have more speed, a better starting 5(bench blows though)

more power in the paint!

I guess Nique wasn't as crazy as everyone thought when he said they matched up the best against boston at the end of the regular season

Dick and Bush 2004 · Post #6 » by **Dick and Bush 2004** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:47 am

nique is kid and plays long lost brother...he also looks like webster(Emannuel lewis)...just taller and fatter

Danny Ainge · Post #7 » by **Danny Ainge** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:47 am

nice

Tricky Ricky · Post #8 » by **Tricky Ricky** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:47 am

I wonder which team has the better coach? I dont see the Hawks winning 4 games in a row or another game until next season, what a fight though

Dakid21KG · Post #9 » by **Dakid21KG** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:48 am

I swear I will never watch basketball again if that happens.

Dick and Bush 2004 · Post #10 » by **Dick and Bush 2004** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:49 am

Danny Ainge wrote:this thread better stay or i will be upset.

true
I thought darth retired as a mod. three threads...all deleted in the matter of 1 minute. thanks for displaying your dipleasure. I would have been mad too....a lock is one thing but 3 flat out deletes is ridiculous.

Dick and Bush 2004 · Post #11 » by **Dick and Bush 2004** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:51 am

you want a blue print?
for a celtics win

DO NOT PLay POWE or BIG BABY

GET HOUSE AND TONY ALLEN in the game!!!!!!!!

Celtics_History_Lesson · Post #12 » by **Celtics_History_Lesson** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:53 am

Even if the Celtics do turn it around and win the series, if this is how they go against Atlanta it is likely that they will be in trouble in the next round against a much better team.

Dakid21KG · Post #13 » by **Dakid21KG** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:54 am

Celtics_History_Lesson wrote:Even if the Celtics do turn it around and win the series, if this is how they go against Atlanta it is likely that they will be in trouble in the next round against a much better team.

I think its more the match ups then the team

jfs1000d · Post #14 » by **jfs1000d** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:58 am

Celtics_History_Lesson wrote:Even if the Celtics do turn it around and win the series, if this is how they go against Atlanta it is likely that they will be in trouble in the next round against a much better team.

Not quite accurate. The Hawks are extremely athletic, not other team left compares, maybe the Magic.

Cavs took a notch back athletically with the acquisition of West and Szerbiak and even Ben Wallace.

They won't be as difficult to cover, though LBJ can win it by himself. The Wuz would be a very difficult matchup for the Celtc, Cavs, less so.

legacyinthemakin89c · Post #15 » by **legacyinthemakin89c** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:27 am

Wow I never thought we would be in the same boat here. Athletic teams are both of our downfalls. But at least you guys face the Cavs in the next round, who really aren't that athletic outside of James, so I think you guys will handle them just fine.

s1ickd · Post #16 » by **s1ickd** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:49 am

the hawks problem after the bibby trade wasn't the fact that they werent good enough. it was the fact that they were so inconsistent. when they try as hard as they are now, they're pretty good.

playing zone might be a good idea against the hawks. they have 2 rotation players that can actually shoot consistently.

P2 · Post #17 » by P2 » Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:05 am

Dakid21KG wrote:I swear I will never watch basketball again if that happens.

Me, too.

celticfan42487 · Post #18 » by **celticfan42487** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:15 am

Dick and Bush 2004, Celtic History Lesson in the same thread!!!

Man all we need is curm,celticthug,... and some other kid think he had a brother or something...

and it will be all rare posters!

Relative Autonomy · Post #19 » by **Relative Autonomy** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:36 am

Dick and Bush 2004 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

true
I thought darth retired as a mod. three threads...all deleted in the matter of 1 minute. thanks for displaying your dipleasure. I would have been mad too....a lock is one thing but 3 flat out deletes is ridiculous.

what exactly happened?

Jimmy103 · Post #20 » by **Jimmy103** » Fri May 2, 2008 11:47 am

Dick and Bush 2004 wrote:I am predicting this for the third time. maybe this thread will stay. as a reminder of how some here gave the hawks no chance.

I'm glad they kept this thread as well

Hawks in 6!

Hawks in 6!

Hawks in 6!

Re: Hawks in 6!

Re: Hawks in 6!

Re: Hawks in 6!

Re: Hawks in 6!