Page 1 of 1
Childress Would Look Good In Green
Posted: Sun May 4, 2008 9:17 pm
by Datruth345
...Just Saying
Atlanta has the qualifying offer in 08/09, free agent in 09/10
i'd put a haircut cut clause in his contract though, fro has got to go
Re: Childress Would Look Good In Green
Posted: Sun May 4, 2008 9:31 pm
by Al n' Perk No Layups!
SuperDeluxe wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Either the fro or the face. The fro is fine and the face is fine too, but for some reason the combination doesn't look right.
I agree, Livingston has the same thing. He looks very awkward with a fro.
Re: Childress Would Look Good In Green
Posted: Sun May 4, 2008 9:32 pm
by SuperDeluxe
Datruth345 wrote: fro has got to go
Either the fro or the face. The fro is fine and the face is fine too, but for some reason the combination doesn't look right.
Posted: Sun May 4, 2008 10:16 pm
by SonicYouth34
Childress' fro looks fine, if anything it should get bigger like Big Ben's
Posted: Sun May 4, 2008 10:20 pm
by Big Baby
Shoot. Forget Childress. I'd be thrilled if we had gotten the #3 pick last year and got Horford to go with Big Al. I hated his ass in the series, but would be pumped if we had him. With him and Big Al, we would've been SET for 15 years.
Posted: Sun May 4, 2008 10:26 pm
by ParticleMan
childress would be a nice posey replacement in a couple of years. but he seems to be one of those guys who always plays his best against us. not so good against the rest of the L.
Posted: Sun May 4, 2008 10:29 pm
by SonicYouth34
Big Baby wrote:Shoot. Forget Childress. I'd be thrilled if we had gotten the #3 pick last year and got Horford to go with Big Al. I hated his ass in the series, but would be pumped if we had him. With him and Big Al, we would've been SET for 15 years.
I was thinking the same thing, if our frontline was PP, AJ, AH we'd have the best balance of defense and offensive, IMO, the entire league
Posted: Sun May 4, 2008 10:46 pm
by Pats19andO
The real question: Tony or Childress?
Re: Childress Would Look Good In Green
Posted: Sun May 4, 2008 10:55 pm
by DelMonte West
Datruth345 wrote:
i'd put a haircut cut clause in his contract though, fro has got to go
It's (most likely) there because the guy has really big ears...the fro takes the attention away.
Reminds me of one of the guys on ESPN's "Sports Reporters" show...has long, badly cut hair to cover up his gigantic ears...don't know his name though.
Posted: Sun May 4, 2008 11:01 pm
by Gomes3PC
SonicYouth34 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I was thinking the same thing, if our frontline was PP, AJ, AH we'd have the best balance of defense and offensive, IMO, the entire league
If we got the 3rd pick we'd likely have traded Pierce and gone for a full blown rebuilding mode.
childress howabout someone else
Posted: Mon May 5, 2008 12:26 am
by sox839
I thought after johnson and horford the guywhoplayed best for atlanta was pachulia. He brought them lots of energy. It is crazy that he played for two otheer teams he would be a nice pickup because we do lack some height and we are thin at center PJ and Pollard are both washed up. Maybe we draft a young guy to backup perk for some minutes.
Posted: Mon May 5, 2008 2:14 am
by kmgarnett21
i think he has the fro b/c he's self concious about his HUGE ears. if u notice his ears, they like dumbo's ears, but its hidden due to his fro. if he had a fade or was bald, he'd prolly float up in midair b/c his ears would get caught in the wind.
Posted: Mon May 5, 2008 5:12 am
by SmoothLikeButta
agreed^

Posted: Mon May 5, 2008 5:27 am
by return2glory
Pats19andO wrote:The real question: Tony or Childress?
Tony who? Allen? I'd take Childress without question. Tony Allen is pretty much done. He might be out of the league in a 1 or 2 if he doesn't recovery mentally and physically fro the 2 knee injuriers.
Childress is a great young talent, something that TA was before he got hurt. Childress is one of the best bench players in this league. I would love it if we had him.
Posted: Mon May 5, 2008 10:51 am
by GuyClinch
TA has looked good in garbage time of late.. I'd like to see him get more minutes. He can get in there and hack Lebron a few times. Though he is smaller he has the quickness to try to keep him out of the lane.
Pete
Re: Childress Would Look Good In Green
Posted: Mon May 5, 2008 3:45 pm
by MyInsatiableOne
Datruth345 wrote:...Just Saying
Atlanta has the qualifying offer in 08/09, free agent in 09/10
i'd put a haircut cut clause in his contract though, fro has got to go
You beat me to it, his fro looks (Please Use More Appropriate Word). Maybe it was "HaHa" funny in college, but it's lame now.
Also, dude needs to work on his shot...ugliest shot in the league!
Re: Childress Would Look Good In Green
Posted: Mon May 5, 2008 3:46 pm
by MyInsatiableOne
DelMonte West wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
It's (most likely) there because the guy has really big ears...the fro takes the attention away.
Reminds me of one of the guys on ESPN's "Sports Reporters" show...has long, badly cut hair to cover up his gigantic ears...don't know his name though.
Mitch Albom.
That guy has HUGE ears...they are Ferengi ears (anyone here watch Star Trek).