Page 1 of 1
Dr. Smith: The Moment of Truth
Posted: Fri Jun 6, 2008 9:08 am
by sam_I_am
Dr. Smith, I know you are out there enjoying this headline on ESPN. All those dark years where people on this board crusaded to drive Pierce out of town. All season long where people - especially the media - tried to make him the 3rd banana.
The truth is that the Truth is a damn good player. 22 points on 10 shots with a bad knee. Think about that while the MVP gets his 24 on 26 shots.
Posted: Fri Jun 6, 2008 11:05 am
by 3pt %
PAUL PIERCE IS THE MUTHA **** TRUTH.
HE IS THE CAPTAIN OF THE CELTICS, A HOF PLAYER AND NEEDS MORE RESPECT, HE IS THE HEART OF THE CELTICS.
in honour of DS (WITH A LITTLE MORE SWEARING)
Posted: Fri Jun 6, 2008 11:23 am
by spf211
Where is my favorite endocrinologist???
We're all in agreement, no one deserves the spotlight in this series more than Paul Pierce.
Posted: Fri Jun 6, 2008 12:10 pm
by cloverleaf
3rd banana? I never once heard that case made. (And I'm praying for the Captain's knee in the biggest series of his life.)
Posted: Fri Jun 6, 2008 12:16 pm
by sully00
When I clicked on this I figured it was asking the good Dr. for his prognossis on the knee.
Cloverleaf
That is the great thing about this forum you read you don't just hear it. And you can go back to Oct/Nov/Dec and read the "We don't need Paul's offense" thread or the like.
Obviously it isn't an easy case to make while the team is winning games with KG out hurt or Ray mired in a shooting slump but that doesn't mean the case wasn't made at all.
Posted: Fri Jun 6, 2008 12:23 pm
by GuyClinch
Hell - some morons were making the case that PP was holding the team back. <g>
Posted: Fri Jun 6, 2008 12:43 pm
by Truthiracy
Are you referring to robert smith?
http://realgm.com/boards/profile.php?mo ... le&u=24417
Why did he get waived?
Posted: Fri Jun 6, 2008 1:21 pm
by cloverleaf
I must have a bad memory, Sully00--and truly that may just be the case here. But I only recall arguments against Pierce's offense being made against his needing to score as many points as he had in the past (as turned out to be the case) or to always be the last-second, 4-on-1 iso option that had become one of his lesser trademarks. Indeed, he seems to have overcome it, making him an even better player.
Certainly no one claimed that Perk or Rondo were going to be primary offensive options back then, so I don't see how a case could be made that Pierce's offense wasn't needed. And I don't believe anyone ever claimed that Ray was a better defender.
!
But spend enough time on these boards and I suppose any crazy argument gets a hearing--metaphorically, that is