Better Celtic Team: KG-Pierce-Allen v Pierce-Gasol-Jefferson
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Better Celtic Team: KG-Pierce-Allen v Pierce-Gasol-Jefferson
- spf211
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,476
- And1: 42
- Joined: Dec 16, 2002
- Location: Jamaica Plain
Better Celtic Team: KG-Pierce-Allen v Pierce-Gasol-Jefferson
Since the Grizzlies eventually gave away Gasol, I think the Celtics may have been able to construct a strong offensive team along the lines of:
Rondo
T. Allen / West
Pierce
Jefferson
Gasol
What I like about this team, in particular, is it sets up Jefferson to be in the post with options to go to outside shooters -- even a traditional outside shooter in Gasol, which would be very effective. The halfcourt offense would be formidble.
Clearly you lose nearly everything here defensively, but you could use a combo of Rondo/Tony Allen to be a defensive backcourt -- more focused at disruptions and turnovers to get the team out and running, the lack of outside shooting could be a problem however.
Gasol is also four years younger than Garnett (28 v. 32) which could extend his playing career alongside Pierce. Naturally, you have the development of Jefferson, Rondo and Allen to hopefully bridge a competitive gap -- though the latter three would eventually need a wing player, of at least Rip Hamilton caliber, to remain effective after Pierce's decline.
I am not sure if that team would ever compete for a championship the way the Celtics currently are -- especially with the defensive deficencies -- but the window would be longer, IMO.
Interesting to see the possible options the Celtics could have been weighing last summer -- poised in either direction to get better in a very quick period of time.
Rondo
T. Allen / West
Pierce
Jefferson
Gasol
What I like about this team, in particular, is it sets up Jefferson to be in the post with options to go to outside shooters -- even a traditional outside shooter in Gasol, which would be very effective. The halfcourt offense would be formidble.
Clearly you lose nearly everything here defensively, but you could use a combo of Rondo/Tony Allen to be a defensive backcourt -- more focused at disruptions and turnovers to get the team out and running, the lack of outside shooting could be a problem however.
Gasol is also four years younger than Garnett (28 v. 32) which could extend his playing career alongside Pierce. Naturally, you have the development of Jefferson, Rondo and Allen to hopefully bridge a competitive gap -- though the latter three would eventually need a wing player, of at least Rip Hamilton caliber, to remain effective after Pierce's decline.
I am not sure if that team would ever compete for a championship the way the Celtics currently are -- especially with the defensive deficencies -- but the window would be longer, IMO.
Interesting to see the possible options the Celtics could have been weighing last summer -- poised in either direction to get better in a very quick period of time.

-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 884
- And1: 1
- Joined: May 22, 2003
- Location: I'll be where I'm at!!
I'll take a shorter window with a better team, and that team is with KG and Allen. That would be an intriguing line up on the offensive end with Big Al and Gasol, but the defense would suffer too much. We also wouldn't have Posey, House or Brown.
"If you drop a phonograph needle on Brasky's nipple, it plays the Beach Boys' 'Pet Sounds.'"
Re: Better Celtic Team: KG-Pierce-Allen v Pierce-Gasol-Jeffe
- TheMartian
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,917
- And1: 6,720
- Joined: Oct 13, 2004
-
Re: Better Celtic Team: KG-Pierce-Allen v Pierce-Gasol-Jeffe
spf211 wrote:I am not sure if that team would ever compete for a championship the way the Celtics currently are -- especially with the defensive deficencies --
There's your answer right there.
- tombattor
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,662
- And1: 807
- Joined: Nov 11, 2003
-
Gasol and Jefferson are very good PF/C combo and between them you can probably count on about 45 ppg from them. However, who's going to play interior D in that lineup? As good as Gasol and Al are on offense, they are as soft on D.
And don't forget, reason number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...1,000,000, we're this close to winning a title is because of our defense.
And don't forget, reason number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...1,000,000, we're this close to winning a title is because of our defense.
- canman1971
- Senior Mod - Celtics
- Posts: 14,940
- And1: 8,972
- Joined: May 13, 2003
- Location: 18 Championship BLVD
-
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,015
- And1: 14,835
- Joined: Jun 25, 2004
The Gasol, Jeff Pierce team isn't near the Lakers offensively, and in case you haven't noticed its the defense that makes this team a title contender.
A pierce, Jeff Allen team was probably 50 wins. A Pierce, Jeff, Gasol team is probably a 45-55 win depending on how well Jeff plays. But, we wouldn't have beaten Detroit, and I doubt we would have beaten Cleveland. In the end, what's the point?
KG is an all-time great defensively at the PF spot (he isn't a center, and how often does a PF dominate the game defensively?).
A pierce, Jeff Allen team was probably 50 wins. A Pierce, Jeff, Gasol team is probably a 45-55 win depending on how well Jeff plays. But, we wouldn't have beaten Detroit, and I doubt we would have beaten Cleveland. In the end, what's the point?
KG is an all-time great defensively at the PF spot (he isn't a center, and how often does a PF dominate the game defensively?).
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 13
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 13, 2008
last year Ainge had so many trade able assets that the celtics were in position to do any number of things, there are many possibilities we could come up with of what our team might have looked like is ainge did any number of things. Regardless it turned out perfectly. theres no way anyone can argue with being 2-0 in the NBA finals against the lakers. the whole point of fielding an NBA team is to win a championship, if you have the chance you go for it, even it means sacrificing some of the future.
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,701
- And1: 3,752
- Joined: Feb 10, 2006
There's no way I'd rather have Jefferson and Gasol over Garnett. We'd be the Lakers- great scoring team that played absolutely no defense. Having a good pair of guards to play D won't make a good D; to have a good team D you need a good pair of defensive big men, and Big Al might be one of the worst defensive big men around (though he has time to get better for sure).
And as BTB said, we could still get Allen and have Gasol and Jefferson.
And as BTB said, we could still get Allen and have Gasol and Jefferson.
Re: Better Celtic Team: KG-Pierce-Allen v Pierce-Gasol-Jeffe
- MyInsatiableOne
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,319
- And1: 180
- Joined: Mar 25, 2005
- Location: Midwest via New England
- Contact:
-
Re: Better Celtic Team: KG-Pierce-Allen v Pierce-Gasol-Jeffe
mzepol wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
There's your answer right there.

It's still 17 to 11!!!!
Re: Better Celtic Team: KG-Pierce-Allen v Pierce-Gasol-Jeffe
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,649
- And1: 71
- Joined: Feb 23, 2008
- Location: ABQ, New Mexico
-
Re: Better Celtic Team: KG-Pierce-Allen v Pierce-Gasol-Jeffe
spf211 wrote:Rondo
T. Allen / West
Pierce
Jefferson
Gasol
Yuck..
Debate the Conspiracy master on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/truthiracy3
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,238
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 18, 2004
The current team is obviously superior to the one listed in the initial thread, IMO.
Though if you could get Gasol for scraps like the Lakers did and then still do the Allen deal like btb mentioned, I'd take that team in a heartbeat. I love KG, but the idea of getting Gasol basically for free and still having a team that would be the odds on favorites to win it all is just too much to pass on. I mean, even if the team fizzled due to a lack of interior defense like many of you have suggested, with that much talent you could just as easily trade for KG the following season.
Though if you could get Gasol for scraps like the Lakers did and then still do the Allen deal like btb mentioned, I'd take that team in a heartbeat. I love KG, but the idea of getting Gasol basically for free and still having a team that would be the odds on favorites to win it all is just too much to pass on. I mean, even if the team fizzled due to a lack of interior defense like many of you have suggested, with that much talent you could just as easily trade for KG the following season.
- tombattor
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,662
- And1: 807
- Joined: Nov 11, 2003
-
captain_cheapseats wrote:The current team is obviously superior to the one listed in the initial thread, IMO.
Though if you could get Gasol for scraps like the Lakers did and then still do the Allen deal like btb mentioned, I'd take that team in a heartbeat. I love KG, but the idea of getting Gasol basically for free and still having a team that would be the odds on favorites to win it all is just too much to pass on. I mean, even if the team fizzled due to a lack of interior defense like many of you have suggested, with that much talent you could just as easily trade for KG the following season.
Come on man. Results are results. You can't possibly have a better result than what we have right now. We were the best team in the league from the beginning and now we're 2 wins away from #17. I don't care what hypotheticals you have, you can't beat results.
Let me put it this way. If you had $50 million in the bank, would you buy 50 million lottery tickets for a chance to win $100 million?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,386
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 15, 2008
PG Rondo/Telfair
SG Allen/Allen
SF Pierce/Gomes
PF Jefferson/Powe/Baby
C Gasol/Perkins
Trade:Ratliff/Green/Minnesota Pick for Gasol (About Equivalent to LA deal)
Trade:West/Szczerbiak/#5 for Ray Allen and Glen Davis
Yes that's a good team, but we have a good team right now. Would we win more championships with that team? Hard to say, but I don't think we should be too greedy. If Danny Ainge had known that Gasol was going to go for peanuts, then maybe he would have waited and not dealt for Garnett. Still, you have to take what you can get, and what we got was pretty damn good.
SG Allen/Allen
SF Pierce/Gomes
PF Jefferson/Powe/Baby
C Gasol/Perkins
Trade:Ratliff/Green/Minnesota Pick for Gasol (About Equivalent to LA deal)
Trade:West/Szczerbiak/#5 for Ray Allen and Glen Davis
Yes that's a good team, but we have a good team right now. Would we win more championships with that team? Hard to say, but I don't think we should be too greedy. If Danny Ainge had known that Gasol was going to go for peanuts, then maybe he would have waited and not dealt for Garnett. Still, you have to take what you can get, and what we got was pretty damn good.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,238
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 18, 2004
tombattor wrote:Come on man. Results are results. You can't possibly have a better result than what we have right now. We were the best team in the league from the beginning and now we're 2 wins away from #17. I don't care what hypotheticals you have, you can't beat results.
Let me put it this way. If you had $50 million in the bank, would you buy 50 million lottery tickets for a chance to win $100 million?
Of course you could have a better result. Namely, a hypothetical team that not only wins a title this year, but continues to win well into the foreseeable future.
But I think you're missing the point of this thread. It's not that I wish we had traded for Gasol instead of KG; I'm thrilled with the current team and am very happy with everything that has happened. Instead, it's meant more as a fun thought experiment, i.e. what would have happened if Ainge had done X instead of Y. Some people enjoy abstract thought, hence threads like this. It doesn't mean they like the current team any less.
- BeanTownBrawler
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,659
- And1: 121
- Joined: Sep 20, 2003
- Location: BOSTON
What if we traded scraps for Gasol, got Ray Allen, then STILL traded Al J for KG?
Rondo
R Allen
Pierce
KG
Gasol
LOL. Or kept Al J and traded Gasol for KG. Hahaha its absurd to think what the Lakers gave up for that mofo
Rondo
R Allen
Pierce
KG
Gasol
LOL. Or kept Al J and traded Gasol for KG. Hahaha its absurd to think what the Lakers gave up for that mofo
"I have conflicted feelings right now. I mean its great and all, and no way I'd change it, but does anyone else kinda feel that we got luckier than we deserved to get? It almost feels like we're the benefactor of some NBA conspiracy."