ImageImageImage

OT: Has OKC stolen G.S.' Thunder?

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
campybatman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,100
And1: 185
Joined: Apr 19, 2007

OT: Has OKC stolen G.S.' Thunder? 

Post#1 » by campybatman » Thu Sep 4, 2008 2:50 pm

Interesting. This didn't even occur to me. Boston is fortunate that they've a logo that's truly their own in a league that lacks originality. Like Boston, there are a few other franchises that can make this claim. However, quite a few of these logos resemble one another.

I'm curious to know what will be the Warriors take on this. I think they've a legitimate argument here. How similar is too similar? Still, It'll be interesting to see what OKC decides on for their mascot and their alternative logo. What other ways can you represent thunder as a mascot. I don't think the mascot will be named Thunder, obviously. It could be named Boom or Clash or something. I think the Warriors origination will take a wait and see approach. They can't cry foul until they see the mascot and its' name first. Nothing may even come of this.

Thunder is synonymous with lightning as in: Thunder and lightning. So, the marketing departments of both franchises could've some fun whenever the two teams meet during the regular season. Perhaps, a rivalry will born.



Today is the day that the Oklahoma City franchise unveils their colors, logo and team name. A big day for Oklahoma City as they take the next step toward moving the franchise from Seattle to their new haunts. It isn't much of a secret that the team will more than likely be called the Thunder as there have been leaks to that effect for weeks. This may not sit well with the Golden State Warriors whose official NBA mascot is named Thunder and their logo features Thunder holding a lightning bolt. It will be interesting to see if the Warriors file a complaint since the OKC team has in effect, stolen their Thunder.


http://celticsgreen.blogspot.com/2008/0 ... s-big.html



Image



The reasoning behind it all makes sense. Perhaps, this is all just a coincidence and the writer of the article is speaking speculatively.



"We think the logo is classic in its style," said team chairman Clay Bennett. "We think it's powerful in its design. We think it evokes energy. We think the word Thunder is displayed with simplicity and dignity. And the colors represent much about Oklahoma.

"Our primary color blue is the color of our state flag. This is very much an Oklahoma organization. The sunset is red and orange. Not too red. Not too orange. And the beautiful sun is reflected by yellow."


http://newsok.com/article/3292623/
User avatar
FakeScreenName123
RealGM
Posts: 14,176
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jul 09, 2003
Location: Town

Re: OT: Has OKC stolen G.S.' Thunder? 

Post#2 » by FakeScreenName123 » Thu Sep 4, 2008 2:59 pm

Its the worst logo of any NBA team. by far. its horrible.
User avatar
campybatman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,100
And1: 185
Joined: Apr 19, 2007

Re: OT: Has OKC stolen G.S.' Thunder? 

Post#3 » by campybatman » Thu Sep 4, 2008 3:24 pm

I would've said unimaginative... But, they've room to evolve. If merchandise sales slump over the next two or three years. They might tweak or even change it altogether. Conversely, I think merchandise sales will be up next season because the whole new experience of having your own NBA franchise to OKC fans will sell itself.
User avatar
Egregious Blunder
General Manager
Posts: 8,814
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 10, 2005
Location: LIC, NYC

Re: OT: Has OKC stolen G.S.' Thunder? 

Post#4 » by Egregious Blunder » Thu Sep 4, 2008 3:26 pm

not sure exactly why, but he reminds me of bimbo coles with a better jumper.
User avatar
greenbeans
RealGM
Posts: 60,145
And1: 14,187
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
     

Re: OT: Has OKC stolen G.S.' Thunder? 

Post#5 » by greenbeans » Thu Sep 4, 2008 7:36 pm

Egregious Blunder wrote:not sure exactly why, but he reminds me of bimbo coles with a better jumper.

the mascot?? lol
I think We here in Boston should adopt the Sonics old mascot "Squatch". Why not? keep that thing alive until Seattle gets a team back. I know it'll never happen but somebody should take that thing, its one of the few good ones out there.
User avatar
campybatman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,100
And1: 185
Joined: Apr 19, 2007

Re: OT: Has OKC stolen G.S.' Thunder? 

Post#6 » by campybatman » Thu Sep 4, 2008 11:38 pm

I wonder what goes into the thought process of coming up with a team's mascot. Because what exactly do some of these have to do with the team itself? One of the bravest people in the job of being a NBA mascot has to be Lucky. Because fans can see his face. But, he has company... The seat ushers are dressed just as ridiculously.

I guess the man who dons the Squatch mascot outfit is still under contract so he could be still used but in a different mascot outfit with the Thunder.



http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/372 ... dle28.html
User avatar
OBisHalJordan
Rookie
Posts: 1,176
And1: 907
Joined: Aug 22, 2008
Location: Portland, ME

Re: OT: Has OKC stolen G.S.' Thunder? 

Post#7 » by OBisHalJordan » Fri Sep 5, 2008 10:22 pm

OKC should've gone with the outlaws and some how engineered an "all-public-relations-team" with sprewell, telfair, 'sheed, artest, iverson and ruben patterson and...hhhmmmm...lets say roy tarpley as player/coach/dealer. the goal of this team not being to win any games but to give daniel stern a fatal heart attack thus allowing the nba to become good again.

Return to Boston Celtics