ImageImageImage

Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA?

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
Tricky Ricky
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: HAVERHILL MA

Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#1 » by Tricky Ricky » Mon Dec 1, 2008 2:35 pm

Alright Ive been following the standings a lot recently and have only seen one LA Loss. Now Im saying if LA and us make the playoffs again does the team with homecourt win? I know they cant beat us if we have homecourt but can we beat them if LA has homecourt?
Quote of the year
MyInsatiableOne wrote:Did we just seriously post Danny's personal address and phone # on the board? :o
humblebum
Banned User
Posts: 11,727
And1: 1,755
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#2 » by humblebum » Mon Dec 1, 2008 2:41 pm

The Celtics won on the Lakers homecourt last year... why wouldn't they be able to do it again? Frankly I don't even think their crowd delivers a great homecourt advantage, especially not when you compare them to say Atlanta, whose crowd was extremely pumped up.

I think people need to stop thinking so far ahead, the biggest test will come from the Cavs (who could possibly get an impact player at the deadline by dealing Wally's contract). Lebron is the best player, they play great defense in the playoffs, and they have no real holes to exploit in there overall floor game. If your going to worry about someone, worry about them.
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#3 » by MyInsatiableOne » Mon Dec 1, 2008 2:58 pm

Not necessary but would be nice to have, and I bet you any of the players would say the same things...
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
Dave_From_NB
Starter
Posts: 2,076
And1: 1,538
Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Location: Quispamsis, New Brunswick (not New Bedford!)
   

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#4 » by Dave_From_NB » Mon Dec 1, 2008 2:58 pm

This Forum used to be a great LAL and Kobe free zone. I sure miss the good old days, even if they were only last week.
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#5 » by MyInsatiableOne » Mon Dec 1, 2008 3:29 pm

Dave_From_NB wrote:This Forum used to be a great LAL and Kobe free zone. I sure miss the good old days, even if they were only last week.


^^You mean the days when we sucked and didn't have to bother worrying about who we might play as the top team in the west for a title? :confused:
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
User avatar
tombattor
General Manager
Posts: 8,662
And1: 807
Joined: Nov 11, 2003
       

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#6 » by tombattor » Mon Dec 1, 2008 3:47 pm

We don't need home court against LA because we'll beat them in less than 7 games.
User avatar
Tricky Ricky
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: HAVERHILL MA

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#7 » by Tricky Ricky » Mon Dec 1, 2008 3:54 pm

humblebum wrote:The Celtics won on the Lakers homecourt last year... why wouldn't they be able to do it again? Frankly I don't even think their crowd delivers a great homecourt advantage, especially not when you compare them to say Atlanta, whose crowd was extremely pumped up.

I think people need to stop thinking so far ahead, the biggest test will come from the Cavs (who could possibly get an impact player at the deadline by dealing Wally's contract). Lebron is the best player, they play great defense in the playoffs, and they have no real holes to exploit in there overall floor game. If your going to worry about someone, worry about them.


Ya we won our 1 game against them but that was without Pau. With Pau and in the finals we won 1 of 3. Cle is a big test but I think our toughest east matchup is against Orlando, hopefully we play them well tonight!
Quote of the year
MyInsatiableOne wrote:Did we just seriously post Danny's personal address and phone # on the board? :o
User avatar
Tricky Ricky
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: HAVERHILL MA

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#8 » by Tricky Ricky » Mon Dec 1, 2008 3:55 pm

MyInsatiableOne wrote:
Dave_From_NB wrote:This Forum used to be a great LAL and Kobe free zone. I sure miss the good old days, even if they were only last week.


^^You mean the days when we sucked and didn't have to bother worrying about who we might play as the top team in the west for a title? :confused:



Ya the last time LA wasnt discussed on this board was when we were awful, talking about LA is a good thing in my mind even though I hate them!
Quote of the year
MyInsatiableOne wrote:Did we just seriously post Danny's personal address and phone # on the board? :o
Dave_From_NB
Starter
Posts: 2,076
And1: 1,538
Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Location: Quispamsis, New Brunswick (not New Bedford!)
   

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#9 » by Dave_From_NB » Mon Dec 1, 2008 3:57 pm

MyInsatiableOne wrote:
Dave_From_NB wrote:This Forum used to be a great LAL and Kobe free zone. I sure miss the good old days, even if they were only last week.


^^You mean the days when we sucked and didn't have to bother worrying about who we might play as the top team in the west for a title? :confused:


3 1/2 weeks before the LA game, 6 months and 12 playoff wins away from a possible finals matchup. Isn't it a little early to be talking about this? Perhaps a little worry about an Orlando game tonight, one of those teams that probably constitutes 4 of those 12 wins might be wise.
Celtsfan1980
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,853
And1: 192
Joined: Mar 25, 2008

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#10 » by Celtsfan1980 » Mon Dec 1, 2008 4:02 pm

Rondo is the biggest factor. If he's aggressive on the road like he is capable of being, they can beat anyone. If he plays the way he did in the road games of last year's Championship, I don't see them winning a series vs. the Lakers. I don't think it is necessary, but I would also say we should be focusing on Cleveland rather than the Lakers.
Kefa461
RealGM
Posts: 12,530
And1: 430
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Location: Member of Celtic Nation since '64
       

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#11 » by Kefa461 » Mon Dec 1, 2008 4:05 pm

Nope..... 8-)
WE ARE CELTIC NATION
17 TITLES, ON TO #18.
Kefa461
RealGM
Posts: 12,530
And1: 430
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Location: Member of Celtic Nation since '64
       

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#12 » by Kefa461 » Mon Dec 1, 2008 4:06 pm

Dave_From_NB wrote:
MyInsatiableOne wrote:
Dave_From_NB wrote:This Forum used to be a great LAL and Kobe free zone. I sure miss the good old days, even if they were only last week.


^^You mean the days when we sucked and didn't have to bother worrying about who we might play as the top team in the west for a title? :confused:


3 1/2 weeks before the LA game, 6 months and 12 playoff wins away from a possible finals matchup. Isn't it a little early to be talking about this? Perhaps a little worry about an Orlando game tonight, one of those teams that probably constitutes 4 of those 12 wins might be wise.


Amen to that 8-)
WE ARE CELTIC NATION
17 TITLES, ON TO #18.
DieselCeltic
Banned User
Posts: 668
And1: 0
Joined: May 12, 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#13 » by DieselCeltic » Mon Dec 1, 2008 4:25 pm

True, real champions win on the road. If you can't win 2 on the road, you don't deserve to be a champion. We beat them on their own turf before, we will do it again.
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#14 » by MyInsatiableOne » Mon Dec 1, 2008 5:09 pm

DieselCeltic wrote:True, real champions win on the road. If you can't win 2 on the road, you don't deserve to be a champion. We beat them on their own turf before, we will do it again.


We only won once in LA in the Finals...
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
User avatar
tombattor
General Manager
Posts: 8,662
And1: 807
Joined: Nov 11, 2003
       

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#15 » by tombattor » Mon Dec 1, 2008 5:29 pm

MyInsatiableOne wrote:
DieselCeltic wrote:True, real champions win on the road. If you can't win 2 on the road, you don't deserve to be a champion. We beat them on their own turf before, we will do it again.

We only won once in LA in the Finals...

Exactly. What the hell is that genius talking about? Who cares how many you win on the road? Champion is a champion. That's why you try to get the top seed during the regular season, so you don't have to win as many on the road to become a champion.
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#16 » by MyInsatiableOne » Mon Dec 1, 2008 6:19 pm

No kidding...whether you win all 4 at home or 2 and 2, winning 4 wins the series, PERIOD.
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
s1ickd
Veteran
Posts: 2,628
And1: 247
Joined: Jul 26, 2006

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#17 » by s1ickd » Mon Dec 1, 2008 7:59 pm

4-2 if we have home court, it's a tossup if we don't.
User avatar
campybatman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,100
And1: 185
Joined: Apr 19, 2007

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#18 » by campybatman » Mon Dec 1, 2008 8:43 pm

I view the NBA Finals as favoring the road team. All the Lakers would've had to do to gain home court advantage was to steal a game in Boston either game one or two. As it turned out, Boston proved that they not only can win a game in Los Angeles. But, they could push the Lakers to almost winning more than that one.

Keep in mind, Pierce enjoys playing on the Lakers' court and he and a few other teammates are from CA. It's a homecoming for them so they're extra motivated to perform well in front of family and friends.



Walkin' in L.A.
Walkin' in L.A., nobody walks in L.A.
Walkin' in L.A.
Walkin' in L.A., nobody walks in L.A.
GuyClinch
RealGM
Posts: 13,345
And1: 1,478
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#19 » by GuyClinch » Mon Dec 1, 2008 8:44 pm

I'd prefer to have homecourt for more subtle reasons. It sends a message to the refs and the league that your team is the best. This is critical in tight games because I honestly feel that does translate to more calls and a better chance at winning.

We are only one game behind the Lakers. We can catch them - and we should absolutely try to.

Pete
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Do we need to have homecourt to beat LA? 

Post#20 » by MyInsatiableOne » Mon Dec 1, 2008 8:59 pm

bonsaiflipflops wrote:I view the NBA Finals as favoring the road team. All the Lakers would've had to do to gain home court advantage was to steal a game in Boston either game one or two. As it turned out, Boston proved that they not only can win a game in Los Angeles. But, they could push the Lakers to almost winning more than that one.

Keep in mind, Pierce enjoys playing on the Lakers' court and he and a few other teammates are from CA. It's a homecoming for them so they're extra motivated to perform well in front of family and friends.



Walkin' in L.A.
Walkin' in L.A., nobody walks in L.A.
Walkin' in L.A.
Walkin' in L.A., nobody walks in L.A.


I agree with this and said it during the Finals last year, the 2-3-2 format in the Finals is utter ****. There is NO REASON why the team with homecourt, if both teams win out on their home floor, should be playing game 6 DOWN a game. The homecourt team should ALWAYS have games 1,5, and 7 at home...PERIOD.
It's still 17 to 11!!!!

Return to Boston Celtics