ImageImageImage

Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

Jammer
General Manager
Posts: 8,791
And1: 3,314
Joined: Mar 06, 2001
Contact:
 

Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#1 » by Jammer » Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:21 am

1. Turnovers Boston 17 versus LA 11. Of the Celtics 17 turnovers (5 by PP),
8 to 10 were simply bad passes that shouldn't have been thrown where they were.

2. Three Point Shooting. Celtics 5-22 (22%) versus 8-20 (40%) for Lakers.
Ray and Eddie (combined 3-14 from 3) were off.
Even though KG was on fire, and PP was on, they need at least one of
Ray or Eddie to be shooting well from 3.
Actually, the Celtics had 5 made baskets whistled off
due to personal fouls before the shot, 3 by Ray, I believe.

3. Personal Fouls Boston 24 to Lakers 18. Celtics, who drive a lot,
depend on a tightly called game to get to the line.

I'm sure other posters will come up with other reasons.

That offensive foul on Rondo when Kobe raked Rondo in the face
was hideous, but it wasn't the worst call.
User avatar
chakdaddy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,378
And1: 1,420
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#2 » by chakdaddy » Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:27 am

The 40 or so offensive fouls Derek whatshisname called...

Anyway, at least the refs were pretty even when it counted back in June. But this was pretty pathetic.
User avatar
shobe_81
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 2,749
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 17, 2007

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#3 » by shobe_81 » Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:28 am

That Rondo call was pretty bad but he did hook Odom. It's like a call which doesn't get called very often kinda like KG's illegal screens.

Anyways, this wasn't the Celtics, too many unforced turnovers.

Personal Fouls Boston had 6 more than Lakers and the free-throw advantage 15 to 8 Lakers. That isn't that big of a difference.

Lets start hearing the officiating complains:
User avatar
shobe_81
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 2,749
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 17, 2007

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#4 » by shobe_81 » Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:31 am

chakdaddy wrote:The 40 or so offensive fouls Derek whatshisname called...

Anyway, at least the refs were pretty even when it counted back in June. But this was pretty pathetic.


:lol: Take off the homer goggles 8-)

Game 2 of the Finals:

Boston 21 Personal fouls to Lakers 28

Boston 38 Free-Throws to Lakers 10

Yea pretty even :roll:
User avatar
SuigintouEV
General Manager
Posts: 7,939
And1: 1,556
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Contact:
   

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#5 » by SuigintouEV » Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:35 am

How about the playmaking. Way too much Tony Allen handling the ball. Way too little Kevin Garnett posting up. Rondo got pretty exposed today, despite the 12 assists. But the main thing is the BENCH. Tony Allen sucks. Celtics bench bigs sucked. House didn't get any rhythm threes.

This is my first time watching the celtics this season to be honest but i wasn't all that impressed. scoring 83 points is just bad against ANY defense when you have this many great players.
Image
"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
User avatar
Dirty Water
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,785
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 29, 2005
Location: The future

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#6 » by Dirty Water » Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:41 am

shobe_81 wrote:
chakdaddy wrote:The 40 or so offensive fouls Derek whatshisname called...

Anyway, at least the refs were pretty even when it counted back in June. But this was pretty pathetic.


:lol: Take off the homer goggles 8-)

Game 2 of the Finals:

Boston 21 Personal fouls to Lakers 28

Boston 38 Free-Throws to Lakers 10

Yea pretty even :roll:


When your offense goes through the paint, you get fouls. Boston has most of an inside physical presence than Lakers, hence disparity of free throws
User avatar
shobe_81
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 2,749
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 17, 2007

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#7 » by shobe_81 » Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:47 am

Exactly but just pointing out to his post.

The Lakers attacked the basket a lot, yes Celtics had more Points in Paint but KG was shooting jumpers, I don't remember KG hooks/dunks besides the Lobs. And Rondo attacked but he would pass the ball off rather than attempt the shot.

Primarily the bench was the problem, Powe didn't attack like he usually does, it was Tony going 1 on 1 often.

I think Home Court will be a huge advantage because the bench players tend to play very well at home.

And give some credit to Lakers defense, they held the celtics to 46% and were also held to 46% by the Celtics. They played the grind it out Celtics style and won.
Jammer
General Manager
Posts: 8,791
And1: 3,314
Joined: Mar 06, 2001
Contact:
 

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#8 » by Jammer » Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:48 am

I also thought that Eddie House, Tony Allen,
Paul Pierce and Rondo made almost no effort to
get Ray Allen open looks.

Now, I noticed Rondo and Ray got in a tiff,
and Paul separated them by pushing Ray to where he should be as
the ball was being inbounded.

But to not pass the ball to a guy who was on early
(Ray may have lost his legs late in the game),
well, that was poor execution,
bad play by PP, Rondo, Eddie and Tony,
and part of the reason that the Celtics lost.
return2glory
RealGM
Posts: 16,988
And1: 10,677
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#9 » by return2glory » Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:54 am

The reason we lost:

WE ONLY SOCRED 2 POINTS IN THE FINAL 3:56!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The was no P.J. Brown or Posey to bail us out with big shots. This curent team will not be able to advanve against the Cavs. We need to need better players to our bench. Rondo and Perkins were non factors offensively down the stretch.
Jammer
General Manager
Posts: 8,791
And1: 3,314
Joined: Mar 06, 2001
Contact:
 

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#10 » by Jammer » Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:55 am

It's too bad that OKC has 15 guys on their roster.

Because to get Joe Smith, the Celtics would have to
cough up Scal + one of (Davis, Pruitt, Giddens, O'Bryant or Cassell)
Walker doesn't work in a 2 for 1, although with Cassell, Walker does,
if Cassell is waived by OKC.

I think that Giddens has the potential to be a real player,
so I wouldn't want to deal him.

Due to Walker's age of 21, I'm hesistant to deal him,
since he could turn out to be a player also.

Which means it's Pruitt.

So, it's
Scal + Pruitt

since OKC has enough bigs that O'Bryant would be of no interest to them.

I think the Celtics might want to do
Scal + Pruitt for Joe Smith even if they sign Mutombo.

They can then re-sign Joe Smith for next season,
since Mutombo will likely be done.

Hopefully OKC makes a 2 or 3 for 1 before the trade deadline
so the Celtics can possibly have a crack at Joe Smith.
Jammer
General Manager
Posts: 8,791
And1: 3,314
Joined: Mar 06, 2001
Contact:
 

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#11 » by Jammer » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:08 am

return2glory wrote:The reason we lost:

WE ONLY SOCRED 2 POINTS IN THE FINAL 3:56!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The was no P.J. Brown or Posey to bail us out with big shots. This curent team will not be able to advanve against the Cavs. We need to need better players to our bench. Rondo and Perkins were non factors offensively down the stretch.


I guess I didn't make my view clear in the intial post.

The Celtics didn't lose the Laker game in the last 4 minutes.

The Celtics lost the game in the first 44 minutes,
by not taking control of a game that they could have.

Too many stupid turnovers ( 17 ),
poor 3 point shooting (5-22),
not getting Ray Allen open looks when he was on early (turnovers affected that),
a hissy fit between Rondo/Ray and then Pierce/Ray
where Rondo, Pierce, Eddie and Tony stopped passing Ray the ball
when he was wide open,
only giving him the ball late on the clock or when he was harassed/rushed.

Rondo, Pierce, Eddie and Tony mismanaged Ray in my book,
and I think someone has to show them the plays on the monitor
where they didn't get him the ball when he was wide open
before the last 4 minutes.

And having 6 more fouls called,
with a bunch of no calls against the Lakers,
and another bunch of phantom fouls on Celtics,
certainly didn't help.
User avatar
Ortho Stice
Veteran
Posts: 2,889
And1: 76
Joined: Mar 11, 2003

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#12 » by Ortho Stice » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:10 am

That "game" was weird. It was like a four hour long commercial with random minute long bursts of basketball spliced in once in a while. I ended up watching a full movie during the commercials. As for the game: you have to lose once in a while. I think the Lakers felt like they needed to win this game after what happened to them in the finals, and luckily for them the first trip around was in their home court. I'm sure the Celtics aren't happy they lost on Christmas, yet at the same time they should still be confident that they can beat them in a seven game series, again.
MaxwellSmart
General Manager
Posts: 7,580
And1: 2,326
Joined: Jun 17, 2007

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#13 » by MaxwellSmart » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:16 am

Lakers "Game of the Year"---just another game for us.....on to the rest of the season...please Danny, we need another Big guy...Big Baby and Powe are too short.
Chubby Chaser
Banned User
Posts: 2,744
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 20, 2005
Location: California

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#14 » by Chubby Chaser » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:16 am

The reason why you guys lost is because we are a completely different team than we were last year. I mean you guys did beat us last year during the Finals. There's no denying that. But now that we're finally back healthy it's a different story with Bynum in the middle as was evident today. Now Pau is back at the PF position and KG has to guard him away from the basket. Which is HUGE. KG won't have the luxury of guarding Pau as a 5 underneath the basket in the paint. Now that he's farther away from the basket he isn't going to be able to be as an effective help defender. Which was evident in the final minutes of that game when Kobe drove and KG left Pau open to help and Pau Gasol just made you guys PAY all day. This is where we were so crippled last year when we weren't healthy and we had Lamar and Pau inside as opposed to Pau and Bynum. We dont' give up those cute layups you guys were getting last year because Andrew's in the paint blocking shots and changing shots. We were definitely the tougher team today too on the court, so cut all that nonsense of Lakers being soft. Because when healthy, we're one ofthe toughest teams in the league. 8-)

Sasha really pestered Ray Allen and made him really uncomfortable out their today. He chased him off all those screens and got under his skin.

Good game today though. You guys did make it tough and competitive.
return2glory
RealGM
Posts: 16,988
And1: 10,677
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#15 » by return2glory » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:28 am

Jammer wrote:
return2glory wrote:The reason we lost:

WE ONLY SOCRED 2 POINTS IN THE FINAL 3:56!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The was no P.J. Brown or Posey to bail us out with big shots. This curent team will not be able to advanve against the Cavs. We need to need better players to our bench. Rondo and Perkins were non factors offensively down the stretch.


I guess I didn't make my view clear in the intial post.

The Celtics didn't lose the Laker game in the last 4 minutes.

The Celtics lost the game in the first 44 minutes,
by not taking control of a game that they could have.

Too many stupid turnovers ( 22 ),
poor 3 point shooting (5-22),
not getting Ray Allen open looks when he was on early (turnovers affected that),
a hissy fit between Rondo/Ray and then Pierce/Ray
where Rondo, Pierce, Eddie and Tony stopped passing Ray the ball
when he was wide open,
only giving him the ball late on the clock or when he was harassed/rushed.

Rondo, Pierce, Eddie and Tony mismanaged Ray in my book,
and I think someone has to show them the plays on the monitor
where they didn't get him the ball when he was wide open
before the last 4 minutes.

And having 6 more fouls called,
with a bunch of no calls against the Lakers,
and another bunch of phantom fouls on Celtics,
certainly didn't help.


Our bench was bad like most games. We had a 24-23 lead at the end of the 1st. Then the starters went our, we were down 37-29 in 5 minutes. Either way you look at it, not having Posey and P.J. hurt us.

As far as the last 4 minutes, we lost the game here as well. We were up 81-79 and got outsocred 13-2 in the final 3:56. Two points in the last 4 minutes is pathetic.
User avatar
Ortho Stice
Veteran
Posts: 2,889
And1: 76
Joined: Mar 11, 2003

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#16 » by Ortho Stice » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:30 am

Lakers fans can rub this loss in our faces as much as they want, considering it means little to us. Get four wins over us, in the playoffs, then I'll have something to be upset about.
User avatar
TommyTheCat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,311
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: oregon

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#17 » by TommyTheCat » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:30 am

MaxwellSmart wrote:Lakers "Game of the Year"---just another game for us.....on to the rest of the season...please Danny, we need another Big guy...Big Baby and Powe are too short.


that's not too far off of the truth. although i doubt that 'it's just another game' for the C's, especially with a long winning streak like that and going against the team they beat in finals. the lakers actually played with intensity for an entire game which is rare unlike the C's who do it on a regular basis. definitely the lakers are better this year with a healthy ariza and somewhat healthy bynum (still getting his legs and not the same as before the injury) and the C's bench needs more help. hopefully both teams will get a rematch in the finals.
User avatar
mr_sunshine
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,430
And1: 482
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#18 » by mr_sunshine » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:31 am

shobe_81 wrote:That Rondo call was pretty bad but he did hook Odom. It's like a call which doesn't get called very often kinda like KG's illegal screens.

Anyways, this wasn't the Celtics, too many unforced turnovers.

Personal Fouls Boston had 6 more than Lakers and the free-throw advantage 15 to 8 Lakers. That isn't that big of a difference.

Lets start hearing the officiating complains:


Because 6 of them were offensive fouls? DURKA DURKA! Fail logic is fail?
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,070
And1: 9,071
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#19 » by ParticleMan » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:35 am

yawn, i'm so tired of hearing about posey and PJ. seriously, these guys were not allstars. they really weren't very good. statistically they were by far our worst rotation players. are we going to have to hear that crap after every loss?

our bench actually did OK. they were bad in the 1st half, but they made up ground in the 4th Q. the starters lost this game. we had an 81-79 lead, and they beat us down the stretch.

meh, ish happens. i wasn't that impressed with the lakers. they wouldn't beat us in a 7-game series.
User avatar
mr_sunshine
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,430
And1: 482
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

Re: Reasons Why Celtics Lost to Lakers on Christmas 

Post#20 » by mr_sunshine » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:35 am

return2glory wrote:
Jammer wrote:
return2glory wrote:The reason we lost:

WE ONLY SOCRED 2 POINTS IN THE FINAL 3:56!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The was no P.J. Brown or Posey to bail us out with big shots. This curent team will not be able to advanve against the Cavs. We need to need better players to our bench. Rondo and Perkins were non factors offensively down the stretch.


I guess I didn't make my view clear in the intial post.

The Celtics didn't lose the Laker game in the last 4 minutes.

The Celtics lost the game in the first 44 minutes,
by not taking control of a game that they could have.

Too many stupid turnovers ( 22 ),
poor 3 point shooting (5-22),
not getting Ray Allen open looks when he was on early (turnovers affected that),
a hissy fit between Rondo/Ray and then Pierce/Ray
where Rondo, Pierce, Eddie and Tony stopped passing Ray the ball
when he was wide open,
only giving him the ball late on the clock or when he was harassed/rushed.

Rondo, Pierce, Eddie and Tony mismanaged Ray in my book,
and I think someone has to show them the plays on the monitor
where they didn't get him the ball when he was wide open
before the last 4 minutes.

And having 6 more fouls called,
with a bunch of no calls against the Lakers,
and another bunch of phantom fouls on Celtics,
certainly didn't help.


Our bench was bad like most games. We had a 24-23 lead at the end of the 1st. Then the starters went our, we were down 37-29 in 5 minutes. Either way you look at it, not having Posey and P.J. hurt us.

As far as the last 4 minutes, we lost the game here as well. We were up 81-79 and got outsocred 12-2 in the final 3:56. Two points in the last 4 minutes is pathetic.


Good thing we'll end up with one of Deke, Zo, or Joe Smith most likely then eh? Powe + Deke or Zo would be awesome. BBD is a liability. I don't care what anyone else says! He had one good game last year, at Detroit, but almost anyone could have made those layups.

Return to Boston Celtics