Celts09 wrote:When players go down to the D League they shouldnt be part of the 15 man roster. It would allow NBA teams to sign other players that can help their team now.
In theory I agree with you but what would stop the richer teams from stockpiling real talent in the D-League?
The problem with the D-League is that is basically the Mountain West Conference on crack. Sure, you can instruct your players to play in a certain manner and to work on certain fundamental aspects of their game. What is happening, though, is that the teammates on these teams are all gunning and gambling on defense.
For instance, look at the bigs on Utah. Besides being utter garbage, they shoot contested jumpers in the middle of a set-play. It's like telling your player to improve his game by playing with four Rick Davis' on his team. You can't really blame those players because they want a shot to make it onto the end of someone's bench.
The only way you improve the D-League, imo, is to require each team to have a minor league team. Then you must cap out spending for that D-League affiliate, not to include 1st RD picks, so as to avoid the teams with fiscal superiority from basically buying a "second" NBA team for depth purposes. Maybe cap out the maximum time affiliated with an NBA team at 3 years. Say, BillFromBoston has played 3 years in the D-League for the Celtics, the Celtics would not be able to send him down again for a fourth season. If another team signs him to a D-League contract, he can only sign and play in the D-League for that one season.
The D-League does have it's benefits but there are way too many flaws in it's construction for it to be viable breeding ground for future NBA talent. And don't listen to the entire "the D-League has sent up the most 10-day contracts" etc, bit, either. The D-League is currently the only half-decent minor league in the USA. The ABA, IBL, WBL, etc have all fallen away a bit.
As to the original view of the OP, no freaking way. You don't mortgage the future like that, imo. The following players are the only that I would be inclined to cut bait with in the right deal:
Tony Allen
Glen Davis
Sam Cassell
Players I would move if the return was ideal:
Brian Scalabrine
Ray Allen
Eddie House
Everyone else is a keeper for the foreseeable future (unless a knock my socks off kind of deal came about.)
I am especially intrigued by Pruitt, O'Bryant, Walker and Giddens. I need to see more, in different situations, before I am ready to ship them out.
Rondo, Perkins and Powe will keep this ball rolling into the future.