http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=A ... &type=lgns
Now they want an advantage for the next game....5 vs 8 is not enough......they just might get it cause you know how it goes.
The NBA...where 5 vs 8 is not enough.









Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
lojowo wrote:Its kind of funny that these complaints are coming from Miller, who GOONED it up to draw Ray Allen's 6th foul.
I think it was cosmic justice that he was the goat missing the last two free throws.
MyInsatiableOne wrote:Did we just seriously post Danny's personal address and phone # on the board?
Who-rod wrote:I hope when they review that tape that they review the play near the end when Noah literally set a screen as if he were a LT blocking Perk, with a shoulder in the gut, so Rose could roll off it for a big hoop. Also, the call on Ray laying a finger on Gordon for his 5th, that was a crazy call that NEVER, EVER, gets called.
Frank Lucas wrote:Let's keep it real the Cs don't have a chance tomorrow night becuase the refs are going to give the Bulls all the calls. Plus the league would want this to go to 7 games because Chicago is the 2nd largest tv market in the play-offs the league wants that game 7 on Sunday. Also the only way to keep the score close is to put the Bulls on the line. Outside of Brad Millers two big misses the Bulls are lights out on the line, it the reason why they can shot 30% and be close. On top of that the Celtics miss a ton os ft shots. So I see a close game with Paul, Ray and Rondo all in foul trouble and the Bulls pull off the game 6 win. I think if the Cs win tomorrow night it will be the biggest win since last year game 6 finals win. The Bulls are already have an advantage with all the crying they've been doing
Also Perkins said before the game that the ref hate the Celtics. In last night game Perkins did not have 1 foul called on him. So my point would be this the Bulls are crying now so the refs will be on their side in game 6.
MyInsatiableOne wrote:How about when Gordon (I think, can't remember who) LANDED ON PAUL'S BACK after an up-fake...and no call...
DorfonCeltics wrote:MyInsatiableOne wrote:How about when Gordon (I think, can't remember who) LANDED ON PAUL'S BACK after an up-fake...and no call...
It was Heinrich and that was just a horrible non-call. I have to say the refs were pretty bad last night both ways. The C's got away with a lot of stuff too.
JohnStarksTheDunk wrote:
6. Again, from an outside perspective, it's a little interesting to see people call the Bulls whiners, and in the next sentence be whining about poor officiating against the Celtics. Sure, there are bad calls all the time, and sometimes a game is more lopsided than others, but I tend to believe that things even out overall. Perkins didn't have a single foul called on him last night, but there were some questionable calls on Ray. It goes both ways. Maybe this is a proper argument for why a flagrant should not have been called? It just seems odd to see C's fans complain about bad calls, when the flagrant foul call went in their favor. Oh well.