Celtics, Cavs, Lakers, Magic, Spurs, and Magic should all be great teams this coming season.
Other than the above mentioned teams, who do you guys think has made good improvements. Who is a sleeper team.
For me, it has to be the Washington Wizards.
They should have a healthy Arenas and Brandon Haywood. They have a good coach in Flip Saunders. They have added Mike Miller, Randy Foye, and now Oberto. I also think JaVale McGee is going to be one of the most improved players. They also have Blatche, Stevenson, and Nick Young.
IMO, the Wizards are going to be a scary team. They are one of the deepest teams in the league that no one is talking about.
Your thoughts.
OT- Sleeper Teams
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
OT- Sleeper Teams
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,998
- And1: 10,692
- Joined: Feb 24, 2005
Re: OT- Sleeper Teams
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,386
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 15, 2008
Re: OT- Sleeper Teams
Wizards were already hard for us to beat the last couple of years. They're a very annoying team to play, because of the Jamison/Garnett and Butler/Pierce matchups and would be a bad playoff draw.
Re: OT- Sleeper Teams
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,663
- And1: 11,630
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
-
Re: OT- Sleeper Teams
Definitely agree with you, R2G. All the guys you mentioned plus Jamison and Butler. They're gonna be a tough out for anybody.
Re: OT- Sleeper Teams
- NashtyNas
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,261
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
-
Re: OT- Sleeper Teams
Wizards as well as the Raptors in the east, same with Charlotte. I think many are going to be surprised how much better Diaw will be, and how much better Chandler is going to fit in to that system, making them a better team over all.

The underappreciated greats:

Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
Re: OT- Sleeper Teams
- chakdaddy
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,378
- And1: 1,420
- Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Re: OT- Sleeper Teams
They should be ok, they've had a decent lineup for a while, but it just hasn't worked out.
Was it ever determined if that preseason ranking of #3 or whatever in Sporting News was a typo? Surely it was?
They're a lot like we were in '07-08 - a team with a lot of talent and chips who couldn't really put together, who then got thown deep into the lottery due to injuries. We wound up with a young star, a veteran star, and the #5 pick; similarly, they have 3 veteran stars (probably none as good as Pierce or Al, so it evens out) and had the #5 pick.
But, I'm not convinced it will work out so well for them. We traded the #5 for another veteran star; they traded it for a couple of role players (I'm not too sold on Foye - I feel like they'd have been better off basketball and money wise adding a young guy with the pick itself.)
I guess the other reason it worked out for us was just the transformational effect of KG on the whole team - even if the trades looked even, he took us from underahchievers to ...achievers - if we had overachieved we would have won 70 games and not seen any game 7s in the playoffs.
I think the intangible effect of KG is why it's not so simple for teams to do what we did; Washington should be a playoff team but I think they're in the middle of the pack with Miami and Atlanta.
Was it ever determined if that preseason ranking of #3 or whatever in Sporting News was a typo? Surely it was?
They're a lot like we were in '07-08 - a team with a lot of talent and chips who couldn't really put together, who then got thown deep into the lottery due to injuries. We wound up with a young star, a veteran star, and the #5 pick; similarly, they have 3 veteran stars (probably none as good as Pierce or Al, so it evens out) and had the #5 pick.
But, I'm not convinced it will work out so well for them. We traded the #5 for another veteran star; they traded it for a couple of role players (I'm not too sold on Foye - I feel like they'd have been better off basketball and money wise adding a young guy with the pick itself.)
I guess the other reason it worked out for us was just the transformational effect of KG on the whole team - even if the trades looked even, he took us from underahchievers to ...achievers - if we had overachieved we would have won 70 games and not seen any game 7s in the playoffs.
I think the intangible effect of KG is why it's not so simple for teams to do what we did; Washington should be a playoff team but I think they're in the middle of the pack with Miami and Atlanta.
Re: OT- Sleeper Teams
- canman1971
- Senior Mod - Celtics
- Posts: 14,949
- And1: 8,991
- Joined: May 13, 2003
- Location: 18 Championship BLVD
-
Re: OT- Sleeper Teams
sd1306 wrote:Wizards as well as the Raptors in the east, same with Charlotte. I think many are going to be surprised how much better Diaw will be, and how much better Chandler is going to fit in to that system, making them a better team over all.
Exactly who is going to play defense on the Raptors?
Re: OT- Sleeper Teams
- BakersDozen
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,598
- And1: 728
- Joined: Dec 03, 2003
- Location: Springfield,Ma
Re: OT- Sleeper Teams
canman1971 wrote:sd1306 wrote:Wizards as well as the Raptors in the east, same with Charlotte. I think many are going to be surprised how much better Diaw will be, and how much better Chandler is going to fit in to that system, making them a better team over all.
Exactly who is going to play defense on the Raptors?
to answer your question. no one.