Page 1 of 2
Phil being Phil
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:24 pm
by Red2
Did anyone catch Phil's comment that the Lakers were not trying to win 72 games? Clearly that was a dig at the comments by Rasheed about how the Celtics could challenge the Bulls record. Why else would he make an asinine comment like that? No matter what happens this year, one thing is certain" Phil Jackson will still be a jerk and Doc Rivers will still be a classy coach.
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:49 pm
by Scalamental
I'm sure he was asked by a reporter. But yeah it's the smug tude' from phil we're all used to.
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:32 pm
by Ortho Stice
I'm pretty sure Phil is going to try to win 82 games, just like every other non-tanking team
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:34 pm
by sinista
I think it's hilarious. What's the big deal? At least he isn't saying "Yea I think we are the best team that has ever played and are going to get the best record in NBA History" Like a certain Ex-Piston
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:42 pm
by Dave_From_NB
Some idiot reporter probably asked him if he was going for the Bulls record, and he answered the same thing Doc would, which is it isn't important. Championships matter, regular season records don't. Don't read anything into what he said.
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:48 pm
by BakersDozen
I dont like Phil but i dont have a problem with his statement. Im guessing he is asked that question every year.
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:01 pm
by Dogen
For all I care the Lakers can win 80 games during the regular season.
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:45 am
by crm0922
Who cares what Rasheed said? Should we be offended if someone on a crappy team, maybe the Twolves or whatever, says "yeah, I think we get that trophy this year" ? Of course it is a big time stretch but why not set your goals high?
Phil's a jackass. But I do like him as a coach.
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:59 am
by threrf23
I don't really mind that comment at all, personally...
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:46 am
by DEEP3CL
Dave_From_NB wrote:Some idiot reporter probably asked him if he was going for the Bulls record, and he answered the same thing Doc would, which is it isn't important. Championships matter, regular season records don't. Don't read anything into what he said.
I'm with Dave here, this is much ado about nothing. I don't think it was a dig at Sheed as the OP suggested. The focus is weathering the trials and tribulations of the regular season and getting to the playoffs as one unit. I'm sure it's the same for the Celtics too.
That's the goal here. Some of you gotta stop taking Phil so serious at his every word. The man is a Jedi master.
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:41 am
by sunshinekids99
If by Jedi Master you mean guy who will follow elite talent to championships, then yes I agree.
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:34 pm
by Kefa461
Not to start an argument but a Coach winning titles does not equal a Coach/GM winning titles and it never has.
ps.....the Real Master "Retired" when he was 49
could have won a lot more but had no ghost to chase.
But I strayed.....that's just Phil.....

Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:08 pm
by tombattor
Phil Jackson is an ****.
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:09 am
by Celtic Esquire
I freakin' can't stand Phil Jackson. His post-Shaq teams didn't do squat until he was gift wrapped Gasol and even then, we smoked them in the Finals.
I can't wait to pound on the Lakers this year just shut that smug prick up.
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:18 am
by Anklebreaker702
Ortho Stice wrote:I'm pretty sure Phil is going to try to win 82 games, just like every other non-tanking team
There it is. Also Phil is a Jedi Master that never wants you to what exactly he is thinking. Even if my team wanted to go for the record I would keep it on hush.
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:20 am
by Anklebreaker702
Celtic Esquire wrote:I freakin' can't stand Phil Jackson. His post-Shaq teams didn't do squat until he was gift wrapped Gasol and even then, we smoked them in the Finals.
I can't wait to pound on the Lakers this year just shut that smug prick up.
And what did your team do before you got KG & Ray Allen?????? 21 years of futility. The feeling is mutual about pounding you guys this year. I hope both teams make it to the Finals, HEALTHY! I really want to see what's up!
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:12 am
by butter17
Anklebreaker702 wrote:Celtic Esquire wrote:I freakin' can't stand Phil Jackson. His post-Shaq teams didn't do squat until he was gift wrapped Gasol and even then, we smoked them in the Finals.
I can't wait to pound on the Lakers this year just shut that smug prick up.
And what did your team do before you got KG & Ray Allen?????? 21 years of futility. The feeling is mutual about pounding you guys this year. I hope both teams make it to the Finals, HEALTHY! I really want to see what's up!

ENOUGH SAID.
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:13 am
by kevin_405
I guess the games have begun..
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:22 pm
by Kefa461
Re: Phil being Phil
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:53 pm
by Anklebreaker702
Well that's a helluva good wait Kefa but 21 years?! Wow!
