Page 1 of 1

Mike James

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 4:20 am
by bendyone
Just reading that Mike James is 'highly available'.....would he be a good back up point? He can shoot and score....vet....good character guy....might make Eddie a lil redundant??

Thoughts?

Re: Mike James

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:32 am
by Bad-Thoma
Stick a fork in him, cuz he's done. If someone has to be bombs away from three I'll take Eddie.

Re: Mike James

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:06 am
by bendyone
fair call....he could at least dribble and run an offence

Re: Mike James

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:56 am
by BillessuR6
He is done. At least Eddie is great at something...besides we have Lue behind the bench, I think at this point he is actually better than James...

Re: Mike James

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:19 pm
by MyInsatiableOne
Bad-Thoma wrote:Stick a fork in him, cuz he's done. If someone has to be bombs away from three I'll take Eddie.


This...apart from his career year (in a contract year, no less) a few back, he's been done for a bit...

Re: Mike James

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:19 pm
by captain green
NOPE.

Re: Mike James

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:42 pm
by hairybyrd
I like the guy and hope he makes a roster but not ours.

Re: Mike James

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 1:33 am
by greenbeans
Him and his hollow stats can stay away from the green.

Re: Mike James

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 8:50 am
by bendyone
greenbeans wrote:Him and his hollow stats can stay away from the green.


But Sheed is allowed on the green cause his stats aren't hollow?

What about Beasley........................................

Oh...not that green

Re: Mike James

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:21 pm
by greenbeans
bendyone wrote:
greenbeans wrote:Him and his hollow stats can stay away from the green.


But Sheed is allowed on the green cause his stats aren't hollow?

What about Beasley........................................

Oh...not that green

You're really comparing Mike James with Sheed and Beasley?
Did you not happen to notice Sheed playing 35+mpg in the playoffs for the past decade? Sure, the past couple years he's coasted, but that doesn't knock him down to Mike James' level.

Re: Mike James

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:06 pm
by irie
greenbeans wrote:
bendyone wrote:
greenbeans wrote:Him and his hollow stats can stay away from the green.


But Sheed is allowed on the green cause his stats aren't hollow?

What about Beasley........................................

Oh...not that green

You're really comparing Mike James with Sheed and Beasley?
Did you not happen to notice Sheed playing 35+mpg in the playoffs for the past decade? Sure, the past couple years he's coasted, but that doesn't knock him down to Mike James' level.


Pretty sure he was implying marijuana.

Re: Mike James

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:21 pm
by tombattor
Mike James is trash.