ImageImageImage

Sheed Revisited

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
grantlongforpresident
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,055
And1: 124
Joined: Jul 30, 2004

Sheed Revisited 

Post#1 » by grantlongforpresident » Tue Feb 9, 2010 7:51 pm

http://www.82games.com/0910/0910BOS2.HTM

Guys, compare unit 1 with unit 3. As you can see, the only difference is in unit #1, Perkins is in the game... and in unit #2, Sheed is in the game.

1 Rondo-R.Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Perkins +193
3 Rondo-R.Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Wallace -22

Amazing right? How much worse the team is with Rasheed in the game????

And Sheed being so good at defense?
-check it out... his man scores more points-per-posession (1.06) than anyone else on the team except Scal. And despite playing with the starters a bunch, his individual +/- is a HUGE dropoff
http://www.82games.com/0910/0910BOS1.HTM

Sheed is doing EXACTLY WHAT I SAID he was going to do. BRICK a ton of shots, PLAY lazy, and MAKE EXCUSES to the refs whenever he Fs up on D. Shooting nearly 5 threes a game at 29%. Ugly.

WORSE, he has (IMO i'm going out on a limb) changed the chemistry of the team. not entirely his fault... but he is certainly part of the problem in the way he approaches the game. just my opinion.

This isn't news though. In the begining of the season, i had a couple threads discussing how our bench was weak and Sheed was overrated. AND GOT ABSOLUTELY LAMBASTED. Unfortunately I was right.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=953231

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=961107
User avatar
Tricky Ricky
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: HAVERHILL MA

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#2 » by Tricky Ricky » Tue Feb 9, 2010 8:16 pm

It doesnt matter if you were right, hes a member for two more years DEAL WITH IT!
Quote of the year
MyInsatiableOne wrote:Did we just seriously post Danny's personal address and phone # on the board? :o
User avatar
greenbeans
RealGM
Posts: 60,149
And1: 14,188
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
     

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#3 » by greenbeans » Tue Feb 9, 2010 8:19 pm

Good thing you're here to give us conclusions in early February. What in the world would we do without you?


People, we're the Celtics, we shouldn't be getting carried away so early in the season, he's here to help win a title, not a 1st seed.
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,422
And1: 23,552
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#4 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Tue Feb 9, 2010 8:24 pm

He isn't horrible. He has game. He has show flashes of it this year, but he just doesn't have the motivation to bring it every night, and that hurts us. If every player on our team brought IT every night, we would be the best team in basketball. We just don't. We come out flat, walking around, with no heart...at least for some portion of the game. I don't remember a single game where we played 48 minutes of solid basketball, except the 1st one against Cleveland. Another thing that hurts Sheed is playing with Big Baby. I wouldn't mind giving Shelden some minutes when Sheed was in the game. Or giving Shelden minutes when Baby was in. Just don't play both at the same time. Doc needs to learn how to use the players he has, at the right times...he runs the same rotations regardless of the opponent, or the score, or if someone is struggling.
But I must say, Sheed is a big part of our problem. Not trying your best during a basketball game is pathetic IMO.
♣ WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎♣ THANK YOU TRUTH! ♣
User avatar
Ortho Stice
Veteran
Posts: 2,889
And1: 76
Joined: Mar 11, 2003

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#5 » by Ortho Stice » Tue Feb 9, 2010 8:30 pm

BRUNiNHO91 wrote: If every player on our team brought IT every night, we would be the best team in basketball.


by IT do you mean a prime michael jordan and bill russell?
mwhis21
Analyst
Posts: 3,528
And1: 1,065
Joined: Jun 16, 2004
Location: Boston
Contact:
       

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#6 » by mwhis21 » Tue Feb 9, 2010 8:48 pm

"Sheed has shown flashes of game?" Really. So did Gerald Green, and Kedrick Brown. I think the "flashes" ship has sailed in any Sheed conversation. Guy has been an All Star caliber player the past few years and just isn't bringing it at all.

Take a look at his numbers and it tells you the whole story. He is playing 9 less minutes a game but only averaging 1 less shot a game. He takes almost 10 shots in 20 minutes of action. What a joke. Maybe he will turn it on after the All Star game, but right now this team doesn't have anyone that will do the dirty work like Leon Powe did. Kind of sad, but I'd rather see Scal getting some more minutes.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,302
And1: 69,910
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#7 » by Celts17Pride » Tue Feb 9, 2010 8:55 pm

So Ray Allen has the best plus/minus, the best winning percentage for the player and is 2nd in Net per 48 mins behind Garnett on the Celtics. Boy is he killing this team! :roll:
Athanacropolis
Analyst
Posts: 3,321
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#8 » by Athanacropolis » Tue Feb 9, 2010 8:57 pm

mwhis21 wrote:"Sheed has shown flashes of game?" Really. So did Gerald Green, and Kedrick Brown. I think the "flashes" ship has sailed in any Sheed conversation. Guy has been an All Star caliber player the past few years and just isn't bringing it at all.

Take a look at his numbers and it tells you the whole story. He is playing 9 less minutes a game but only averaging 1 less shot a game. He takes almost 10 shots in 20 minutes of action. What a joke. Maybe he will turn it on after the All Star game, but right now this team doesn't have anyone that will do the dirty work like Leon Powe did. Kind of sad, but I'd rather see Scal getting some more minutes.


I'm with you, man. Scal, Walker; those guys at least seem like they care out there and show some hustle.
FeedReed
Starter
Posts: 2,307
And1: 839
Joined: Jan 17, 2006

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#9 » by FeedReed » Tue Feb 9, 2010 9:16 pm

grantlongforpresident wrote:http://www.82games.com/0910/0910BOS2.HTM

Guys, compare unit 1 with unit 3. As you can see, the only difference is in unit #1, Perkins is in the game... and in unit #2, Sheed is in the game.

1 Rondo-R.Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Perkins +193
3 Rondo-R.Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Wallace -22

Amazing right? How much worse the team is with Rasheed in the game????

And Sheed being so good at defense?
-check it out... his man scores more points-per-posession (1.06) than anyone else on the team except Scal. And despite playing with the starters a bunch, his individual +/- is a HUGE dropoff
http://www.82games.com/0910/0910BOS1.HTM

Sheed is doing EXACTLY WHAT I SAID he was going to do. BRICK a ton of shots, PLAY lazy, and MAKE EXCUSES to the refs whenever he Fs up on D. Shooting nearly 5 threes a game at 29%. Ugly.

WORSE, he has (IMO i'm going out on a limb) changed the chemistry of the team. not entirely his fault... but he is certainly part of the problem in the way he approaches the game. just my opinion.

This isn't news though. In the begining of the season, i had a couple threads discussing how our bench was weak and Sheed was overrated. AND GOT ABSOLUTELY LAMBASTED. Unfortunately I was right.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=953231

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=961107


yea, i'm with you, i hate sheed with a passion. i think even gerald green was a better help defender.
User avatar
grantlongforpresident
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,055
And1: 124
Joined: Jul 30, 2004

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#10 » by grantlongforpresident » Tue Feb 9, 2010 10:36 pm

Does anyone know how much longer Sheed has on his contract?

i don't think hoopshype has it right. was it a 2 year or 3 year deal?
User avatar
cisco
Veteran
Posts: 2,738
And1: 48
Joined: Nov 14, 2005

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#11 » by cisco » Tue Feb 9, 2010 11:03 pm

grantlongforpresident wrote:Does anyone know how much longer Sheed has on his contract?

i don't think hoopshype has it right. was it a 2 year or 3 year deal?


I believe 2 with a player option. So,that's 3.
Ben-N1ce
RealGM
Posts: 21,735
And1: 20,097
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
       

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#12 » by Ben-N1ce » Tue Feb 9, 2010 11:29 pm

He's worthless. Trade him to another team if they have hotter cheerleaders they want to give us. It's near impossible to root for that guy. He maybe has 2 good games out of ten. All the other ones he's swipes at the players instead of trying to play D sending them to the line constantly or he doesn't move at all and it's a layup. He constantly chucks 3 and he can't even average 5 rebounds. He's had one game with more than 2 rebounds in the last 7 games :lol: If he played 75% on the block I'd give him the benefit of the doubt but that is not the case.
User avatar
Perk Is Beast
Ballboy
Posts: 26
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 09, 2010

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#13 » by Perk Is Beast » Tue Feb 9, 2010 11:51 pm

y is this guy still on the team??? he is the laziest player ive ever seen. All he does is camp around the 3pnt line all day and hes only shootin 29%. He is a crappy defender and rebounder too. and y the F does doc put sheed in at the end of games??? perkins doesnt even play the 4th quarter usually. WE GOTTA TRADE HIM!!!
User avatar
OBisHalJordan
Rookie
Posts: 1,179
And1: 911
Joined: Aug 22, 2008
Location: Portland, ME

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#14 » by OBisHalJordan » Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:05 am

grantlongforprez....i feel you man, the group think on this website can make it very frustrating to argue any point that goes against the grain or is critical of someone who has been anointed beyond criticism by celtic nation orthodoxy. i used to try to argue unpopular points, now i enjoy this website for the ridiculous things that are said instead of looking for reasoned analysis. oh well....
User avatar
SichtingLives
RealGM
Posts: 40,893
And1: 25,460
Joined: Mar 25, 2009

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#15 » by SichtingLives » Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:42 am

He's 35. He's INCREDIBLY talented but yes, LAZY. His habits are unbreakable at this point in his career. Cross your fingers and hope beast Sheed shows up for at least half of our playoffs games, UNLESS we can get some fool to take him off our hands.

We don't need once in a while post moves, bricked threes and ole! defense from our backup pf/c. We need rebounding, defense and aggression. We need a poor man's Perkins, basically.

Sheed is trick or treat, simple as that. This year he's been more trick than treat.
10 miles through the snow uphill both ways
Kefa461
RealGM
Posts: 12,530
And1: 430
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Location: Member of Celtic Nation since '64
       

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#16 » by Kefa461 » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:00 am

grantlongforpresident wrote:http://www.82games.com/0910/0910BOS2.HTM

Guys, compare unit 1 with unit 3. As you can see, the only difference is in unit #1, Perkins is in the game... and in unit #2, Sheed is in the game.

1 Rondo-R.Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Perkins +193
3 Rondo-R.Allen-Pierce-Garnett-Wallace -22

Amazing right? How much worse the team is with Rasheed in the game????

And Sheed being so good at defense?
-check it out... his man scores more points-per-posession (1.06) than anyone else on the team except Scal. And despite playing with the starters a bunch, his individual +/- is a HUGE dropoff
http://www.82games.com/0910/0910BOS1.HTM

Sheed is doing EXACTLY WHAT I SAID he was going to do. BRICK a ton of shots, PLAY lazy, and MAKE EXCUSES to the refs whenever he Fs up on D. Shooting nearly 5 threes a game at 29%. Ugly.

WORSE, he has (IMO i'm going out on a limb) changed the chemistry of the team. not entirely his fault... but he is certainly part of the problem in the way he approaches the game. just my opinion.

This isn't news though. In the begining of the season, i had a couple threads discussing how our bench was weak and Sheed was overrated. AND GOT ABSOLUTELY LAMBASTED. Unfortunately I was right.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=953231

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=961107



Even I am beginning to hope that maybe...just maybe....a trade is pulled off. If only for the fact that you would stop with the I hate Sheed Mini-Series Part #99. The Harry Potter Like I told you So after every loss or anything Sheed might have had to do with loss is ever wearing me down. I like you as a poster so I have a hard time not reading your stuff so I'm drawn in and bam....it's another...I hate him and I told you so post. Danny if you're reading this....help us. Sheed if you are....step up and make this man happy. Cause he's wearing me down. 2 more years.





8-)
WE ARE CELTIC NATION
17 TITLES, ON TO #18.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,764
And1: 9,640
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#17 » by bstein14 » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:09 am

As a Pistons fan, I can tell you Sheed packed it in last year big time. He showed no heart all season after the Billups trade. He was a major reason we were so bad.

Most Pistons fans were happy to see him go.

That said, he's still immensely talented, and likely will be focused come playoff time... But its hard to say if it'll be too little too late by then.
Banks2Pierce
RealGM
Posts: 15,783
And1: 5,324
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
   

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#18 » by Banks2Pierce » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:22 am

grantlong: there's a difference in 500 minutes between the two numbers you threw out there.
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#19 » by MyInsatiableOne » Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:11 pm

bstein14 wrote:As a Pistons fan, I can tell you Sheed packed it in last year big time. He showed no heart all season after the Billups trade. He was a major reason we were so bad.

Most Pistons fans were happy to see him go.

That said, he's still immensely talented, and likely will be focused come playoff time... But its hard to say if it'll be too little too late by then.


^this is the problem, there's no guarantee we'll be able to just turn it on during the playoffs...especially if we're playing every series on the road
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
User avatar
grantlongforpresident
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,055
And1: 124
Joined: Jul 30, 2004

Re: Sheed Revisited 

Post#20 » by grantlongforpresident » Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:59 pm

Banks2Pierce wrote:grantlong: there's a difference in 500 minutes between the two numbers you threw out there.


Oh, i know. Like most other stats if you want true apples to apples you have to scale the stat by minutes. Since that unit is -22, more minutes would probably equal an even worse +/-

Return to Boston Celtics