Robinson Cano vs. Dustin Pedroia

User avatar
Dirty Water
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,785
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 29, 2005
Location: The future

Robinson Cano vs. Dustin Pedroia 

Post#1 » by Dirty Water » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:08 am

Now and for the future... who ya got?
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#2 » by 34Celtic » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:46 am

This reminds me of all the Jorge/Varitek debates

oh and the Nomar/Jeter debates
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#3 » by Basketball Jesus » Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:49 pm

Or the great Ken Ryan/Sterling Hitchcock filibuster of 1994
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
HeelSox
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,303
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 03, 2004
Location: Hansbrough's World

 

Post#4 » by HeelSox » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:19 pm

my boy Pedroia.
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#5 » by 34Celtic » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:29 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:Or the great Ken Ryan/Sterling Hitchcock filibuster of 1994


Or the great Willie Mcgee Luis Polonia better bench player/pinch runner debate of '95.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
Boston's Future
Pro Prospect
Posts: 791
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Location: Plymouth/Springfield, MA

 

Post#6 » by Boston's Future » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:44 pm

This is a tough one. Both guys are future All-Stars for many years to come. For a good season both guys will hit well over .300, and eventually i think both guys will be able to hit 20 home runs. Both guys don't really steal bases, but i like Pedrioa's overall speed better. As for defense, Peds blows Cano out of the water. I think Cano really isn't that great of a defensive second baseman, while Pedrioa has a lot of range, a quick throwing release, and a good arm. Offensivly its a toss up, but Pedrioa gets the edge with his glove
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#7 » by 34Celtic » Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:06 pm

I think Cano is underrated defensively. Problem is he looks nonchalant because he makes a lot of things look easy but he is one of the best at coming in on a slow groundball and gunning the runner out at first.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

 

Post#8 » by cmaff051 » Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:22 pm

34Celtic wrote:I think Cano is underrated defensively. Problem is he looks nonchalant because he makes a lot of things look easy but he is one of the best at coming in on a slow groundball and gunning the runner out at first.


:nod: :nod: He has had a few stinker games where he has looked really bad, but he is really solid out there. Definitely underrated.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#9 » by Basketball Jesus » Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:35 pm

Back in April, this guy wrote:A lot of Cano
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
risktaker91
Banned User
Posts: 2,487
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 18, 2007

 

Post#10 » by risktaker91 » Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:12 pm

Robinson Cano, after his great season last year.
cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

 

Post#11 » by cmaff051 » Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:43 pm

I'll wait until the league adjusts to Pedroia before we make this comparision.
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#12 » by 34Celtic » Sat Jul 21, 2007 4:31 pm

here we go with BABIP again.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
Three34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 36,406
And1: 123
Joined: Sep 18, 2002

 

Post#13 » by Three34 » Sat Jul 21, 2007 11:32 pm

B.J. Upton. Still.
cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

 

Post#14 » by cmaff051 » Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:30 am

34Celtic wrote:here we go with BABIP again.


BABIP is an awful way to judge a hitter. If you hit the ball on the screws all the time, you are going to have a high BABIP.

Stick to the BABIP with pitchers please.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#15 » by Basketball Jesus » Sun Jul 22, 2007 1:40 pm

cmaff051 wrote:
BABIP is an awful way to judge a hitter. If you hit the ball on the screws all the time, you are going to have a high BABIP.


Hunh? No. BABIP is a rather telling stat when it comes to predicting whether a seemingly high batting average in a small sample size is more design than luck/randomness. Case in point: Robbie Cano 2006.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#16 » by 34Celtic » Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:24 pm

Wouldn't every good hitter have a high BABIP? Or a guy who strikes out a lot have a high BABIP? Like Adam Dunn.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
CB4_Toronto_Raptors
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,476
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 23, 2006

 

Post#17 » by CB4_Toronto_Raptors » Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:39 pm

Sham wrote:B.J. Upton. Still.


That's not how you spell Aaron Hill :crazy:



:P


(I'm still going with Cano for now and future to answer the oringinal question)
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#18 » by Basketball Jesus » Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:39 pm

34Celtic wrote:Wouldn't every good hitter have a high BABIP? Or a guy who strikes out a lot have a high BABIP? Like Adam Dunn.


High, as in relation to normal batting average? Yes. League BABIP tends to be around .300 or so, whereas league batting average is somewhat less. But, in context, not every good hitter is going to have a high BABIP, mostly because BABIP is as close to a ranomness stat as can be because it only accounts for balls in play. You'll notice certain trends among great hitters (like the slap-hitting Ichiro or Manny or Jeter) that they have generally higher average BABIP because, you know, they're great hitters and because there's enough of a sample size (i.e. multi-year) that you can make the logical assumption they're good hitters. Plus, and this is where you come in, there's enough visual evidence to point at them being great hitter.


But for guys like Cano that have seemingly great seasons, like his 2006, BABIP can be useful because 1. you know by looking at him that's he's not a once-in-a-generation hitter 2. that the high batting average was due more to a rather "lucky" (again random) collection of hits in-play. It wasn't due to speed, like Ichiro, or exceptional plate discipline like Manny or Bonds, or whomever. He just got a lot of hits in play last season and hits, by and large are more a product of luck than skill.


*For reference, Adam Dunn has a below-average BABIP, mostly because all his value (positive and negative) comes in the form of HRs/walks/strikeouts...things not measured in BABIP.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#19 » by 34Celtic » Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:26 pm

I dont know about hits being luck over skill. If you hit a ball on the nose, on a line...you will have a better chance of getting a hit than someone who continuously gets jammed and hits weak groundballs or has a dip in their swing and gets a lot of pop ups.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
Boston's Future
Pro Prospect
Posts: 791
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Location: Plymouth/Springfield, MA

 

Post#20 » by Boston's Future » Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:00 am

Cano is on fire right now. He has more power, but in the end i think the averages will cancel out. Since Pedrioa has better defense and will be on a playoff team, I find him more valueable.

Return to Player Comparisons