Hart for Pena

Moderator: TyCobb

User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

Hart for Pena 

Post#1 » by Nowak008 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:57 am

I'm the one getting Pena.

The cats - R, K, HR, SB, AVE, RBI, OPS

My team:
Magglio Ord
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#2 » by Basketball Jesus » Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:25 am

1. Which Pena: Carlos or Tony?
2. No
User avatar
Lconte17
Senior
Posts: 501
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 04, 2007
Location: Connect i cut

 

Post#3 » by Lconte17 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:00 pm

Ill assume this is Carlos Pena. so i say no since u have Adri
User avatar
Chach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,330
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 23, 2003

 

Post#4 » by Chach » Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:21 pm

Keep Hart. You already have two first basemen and Pena has a high chance of regressing simply based upon his previous history. He exploded out of no where last season and while he has made improvements in his game, I would be a little weary trading for him. Not to mention that Hart will give you a fine OPS as well as SBs from the OF. Your OF is going to net you a lot of SBs and each hit like 20 HRs a piece. I'd personally start Magglio as your UTL with Gonzo at 1st. The trade-off may net you something in return but you would have two aging/collapse risks in your line-up with Magglio and Pena. If you get their 2007 seasons, you could be on easy street. But if they don't, you better pray your pitching staff is phenomenal. mahalo
~Chach~
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

 

Post#5 » by Nowak008 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:46 pm

Yea its Carlos Pena sorry. The only reason why I am considering it is because from what I have seen C. Pena is ranked really high. It makes no sense to have 3 1st basemen, but I figured I could always move Justin.

I'll probably just pass.


Thanks.
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
User avatar
Lconte17
Senior
Posts: 501
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 04, 2007
Location: Connect i cut

 

Post#6 » by Lconte17 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:06 pm

Unless u can get a top tier SS for Justin i def would pass on this deal
User avatar
Jakespeare
General Manager
Posts: 7,633
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 20, 2008
Location: @808sJake
Contact:

 

Post#7 » by Jakespeare » Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:03 pm

I wouldn't do it because Pena won't hit another 46 HRs. At most he will hit 30. Hart should do the same (around) but also get you SBs and a nice average.
User avatar
macballer30
Senior
Posts: 735
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 29, 2004

 

Post#8 » by macballer30 » Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:31 am

You do have Granderson and Sizemore who are already very similar to Hart so that's one reason to do the trade. But Pena only has one good year under his belt and you have solid first basemen already. Plus 1B is always a deep position.

I'd pass.

Return to Fantasy Baseball