I'm the one getting Pena.
The cats - R, K, HR, SB, AVE, RBI, OPS
My team:
Magglio Ord
Hart for Pena
Moderator: TyCobb
Hart for Pena
- Nowak008
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,588
- And1: 4,303
- Joined: Jul 07, 2006
- Location: Book Publisher
- Contact:
Hart for Pena
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters
THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
- Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
- Chach
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 12,330
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jan 23, 2003
Keep Hart. You already have two first basemen and Pena has a high chance of regressing simply based upon his previous history. He exploded out of no where last season and while he has made improvements in his game, I would be a little weary trading for him. Not to mention that Hart will give you a fine OPS as well as SBs from the OF. Your OF is going to net you a lot of SBs and each hit like 20 HRs a piece. I'd personally start Magglio as your UTL with Gonzo at 1st. The trade-off may net you something in return but you would have two aging/collapse risks in your line-up with Magglio and Pena. If you get their 2007 seasons, you could be on easy street. But if they don't, you better pray your pitching staff is phenomenal. mahalo
~Chach~
~Chach~
- Nowak008
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,588
- And1: 4,303
- Joined: Jul 07, 2006
- Location: Book Publisher
- Contact:
Yea its Carlos Pena sorry. The only reason why I am considering it is because from what I have seen C. Pena is ranked really high. It makes no sense to have 3 1st basemen, but I figured I could always move Justin.
I'll probably just pass.
Thanks.
I'll probably just pass.
Thanks.
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters
THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
- Jakespeare
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,633
- And1: 3
- Joined: Mar 20, 2008
- Location: @808sJake
- Contact: