2019 MLB Dynasty League - Benny Blanco takes the crown!

[Dinamo14]

Waiting on Ralnor, otherwise we are all checked in.

OldNo7, yes I'll address that issue soon.

Couple of other notes. A lot of teams are over the 25 player limit, so please start thinking about whom you are going to drop. I'll set the date for roster drops once Ralnor checks in. I also will post the correct prospect lotto odds and FA draft order in the next couple of days.

Hello David!

My team has 26 players. Based on last year rules one player that finished 2018 season on active roster and has NA eligibility can be moved to a NA position.

My pick for that position is Alex Kirilloff.

Thanks!

Trimis de pe al meu SM-A520F folosind Tapatalk

Dinamo, yes you are right and Kirilloff is eligible. But you he'll need to be one of your 25 keepers. You can then move him to your n/a spot to make room for an additional WW pick. I've added a post with the rules, hope that makes sense.

I'll drop Dallas Keuchel then. Thanks!

Trimis de pe al meu SM-A520F folosind Tapatalk

[Angel strike1]

In.

Shouldn't the standing be based on regular season??(if so I had the worse record for draft pick thing)

I looked back at last year's rules and it was based on the final standings after playoffs.

so how does that make sense ? having the worse team last season. Facing bunch inactive during playoffs =losing chance for higher pick?

[insfo]

Ralnor wants the # of OF question answered first. So here is our first poll for 2019.

How many OF do we need for our league
A) Stay at 3
B) Increase to 4 and remove a BN spot.

For your reference, here is our current position breakdown
C, 1B, 2B, 3B, SS, OF, OF, OF, Util, Util, SP, SP, SP, RP, RP, P, P, P with 7 BN spots.

Running vote count
A) 3 OFs - 0 votes
B) 4 OFs - 2 vote (+ Ralnor)

[Dinamo14]

I am ok with 4. I don't want to lose Ralnor

Trimis de pe al meu SM-A520F folosind Tapatalk

[TyCobb]

I'm ok with an increase in OF as well.

[Ralnor]

I just feel like that there is at least 70 starter quality outfielders in the league with some more people that also have OF eligibility. Having more OF spots will allow more players to be played in the long run. Just my opinion

[Kbend4]

4 OF's

[Angel strike1]

i don't mind using 1 more player spot but why not make it fair ? like not all teams are loaded in of. instead of 4th OF spot make it UTL.

This way people can use whatever as the last starter.

[Dinamo14]

i don't mind using 1 more player spot but why not make it fair ? like not all teams are loaded in of. instead of 4th OF spot make it UTL.

This way people can use whatever as the last starter.

AF is right. Util is better

Trimis de pe al meu SM-A520F folosind Tapatalk

[Benny Blanco]

i don't mind using 1 more player spot but why not make it fair ? like not all teams are loaded in of. instead of 4th OF spot make it UTL.

This way people can use whatever as the last starter.

I don't really see a reason to add a spot and further dilute the league. I like it when there are good finds on the waiver wire. That said, if we did add a spot, I don't know why we should favor OF instead of the Util, which allows managers to use it on whomever they need.

[insfo]

i don't mind using 1 more player spot but why not make it fair ? like not all teams are loaded in of. instead of 4th OF spot make it UTL.

This way people can use whatever as the last starter.

I don't really see a reason to add a spot and further dilute the league. I like it when there are good finds on the waiver wire. That said, if we did add a spot, I don't know why we should favor OF instead of the Util, which allows managers to use it on whomever they need.

Benny, we are adding a starting spot only. The roster size remains the same, so no effect on FAs.

I think going with 3 Util spots seems fair. I'm assuming those who already voted yes to 4 OFs won't have a problem with adding a 3rd Util instead of a 4th OF.

That would put the vote at 6 for adding another starting spot. And that is a majority even without my yes vote.

I'll change it on Yahoo tomorrow unless I hear any objections.

[Benny Blanco]

i don't mind using 1 more player spot but why not make it fair ? like not all teams are loaded in of. instead of 4th OF spot make it UTL.

This way people can use whatever as the last starter.

I don't really see a reason to add a spot and further dilute the league. I like it when there are good finds on the waiver wire. That said, if we did add a spot, I don't know why we should favor OF instead of the Util, which allows managers to use it on whomever they need.

Benny, we are adding a starting spot only. The roster size remains the same, so no effect on FAs.

I think going with 3 Util spots seems fair. I'm assuming those who already voted yes to 4 OFs won't have a problem with adding a 3rd Util instead of a 4th OF.

That would put the vote at 6 for adding another starting spot. And that is a majority even without my yes vote.

I'll change it on Yahoo tomorrow unless I hear any objections.

My bad! Sorry for misunderstanding.

[insfo]

I went ahead and made the change. Ralnor, assuming you are in but please let me know if anything changes. I'll setup for the draft and post lotto ball info in a bit.

[insfo]

Lotto Balls
5 balls - OldNo7, Gyro
4 balls - Ralnor, Angel Strike
2 balls - insfo, Benny Blanco, TyCobb, Kbend4, Yog7711
1 ball - Dinamo (Da Champ!)

Please select your numbers, 1-29

[insfo]

I'll take 9 & 12

[Ralnor]

I will take 7, 13, 21, 22

[OldNo7]

19, 23, 4, 6, 29

[OldNo7]

Waiting on Ralnor, otherwise we are all checked in.

OldNo7, yes I'll address that issue soon.

Couple of other notes. A lot of teams are over the 25 player limit, so please start thinking about whom you are going to drop. I'll set the date for roster drops once Ralnor checks in. I also will post the correct prospect lotto odds and FA draft order in the next couple of days.

This would affect my 25 man roster so feel like we should vote on it sooner rather than later.
Thanks

[TyCobb]

2, 8

[Dinamo14]

25

Trimis de pe al meu SM-A520F folosind Tapatalk