Cabrera for Santana ??
Posted: Thu Apr 9, 2009 7:18 pm
I'm in a 16 team keeper league that keeps 9 players and 4 farm prospects. usually the good teams stay good and the bad teams stay bad because the draft is usually scarce with difference makers and full of mediocre pitchers and outfielders.
I was offered johan Santana and Mike Young for Miguel Cabrera and Alexis Ramerez.
I have Loney and Konerko as back-up first basemen. I have gordon as my third baseman.
My starting pitching staff consists of Buerhle, Floyd, Arroyo, Zito, Moyer, bush , Angels' Escobar and price is on my farm team. Obviously, my starting pitching staff is rather mediocre. but, i only start 4 each week.
On the surface, this would look like a trade of a first baseman for a pitcher and a swap of two shortstops. However , when considering this is a keeper league and the ages of the players and the fact Young loses his shortstop status while Ramerez gains shortstop status, makes me rethink as to who is getting the better deal.
Everything i read says Alexi Ramerez is a better shortstop over young. yet Young bats second in a potent Ranger line-up and ramerez bats 8th for the White Sox. Ramerez is supposedly 5 years younger than Young.
Johan Santana is 5 years older than Cabrera. he's a stud pitcher, but will he continue to be a stud for the next 5 years? There are reports his velocity is down, and he's already reached his peak.
if this were an anual league, i'd do the deal without hesitation. Santana would make a huge addition to my pitching staff. I could replce Cabrera with loney, and Ramerez for young would be a wash this year. My concern is for next year. Young would be a mediocre third baseman, and I'd be without a quality shortstop as all the good ones and top ss minor league prospects would be protected.
everything i read says Cabrera has a higher current value than Santana, and Ramaerez has a higher current value over Young.
Is Sanatana worth it? Will he make that big of a difference to my starting pitchers. is ramerez overrated ?
Long term effects?
I was offered johan Santana and Mike Young for Miguel Cabrera and Alexis Ramerez.
I have Loney and Konerko as back-up first basemen. I have gordon as my third baseman.
My starting pitching staff consists of Buerhle, Floyd, Arroyo, Zito, Moyer, bush , Angels' Escobar and price is on my farm team. Obviously, my starting pitching staff is rather mediocre. but, i only start 4 each week.
On the surface, this would look like a trade of a first baseman for a pitcher and a swap of two shortstops. However , when considering this is a keeper league and the ages of the players and the fact Young loses his shortstop status while Ramerez gains shortstop status, makes me rethink as to who is getting the better deal.
Everything i read says Alexi Ramerez is a better shortstop over young. yet Young bats second in a potent Ranger line-up and ramerez bats 8th for the White Sox. Ramerez is supposedly 5 years younger than Young.
Johan Santana is 5 years older than Cabrera. he's a stud pitcher, but will he continue to be a stud for the next 5 years? There are reports his velocity is down, and he's already reached his peak.
if this were an anual league, i'd do the deal without hesitation. Santana would make a huge addition to my pitching staff. I could replce Cabrera with loney, and Ramerez for young would be a wash this year. My concern is for next year. Young would be a mediocre third baseman, and I'd be without a quality shortstop as all the good ones and top ss minor league prospects would be protected.
everything i read says Cabrera has a higher current value than Santana, and Ramaerez has a higher current value over Young.
Is Sanatana worth it? Will he make that big of a difference to my starting pitchers. is ramerez overrated ?
Long term effects?