Chipper gets Chippy

Post #1 » by **lpsevier** » Mon May 14, 2007 6:00 pm

http://www.realgmbaseball.com/src_wiret ... as_unfair/

Pretty much agree 100%

Mardy2Curry · Post #2 » by **Mardy2Curry** » Tue May 15, 2007 2:22 am

I have to agree as well not just for us but like he said for the Mets as well. Also though I really don't mind playing those guys in the season at least once to see what we can do against them if we meet in the WS.

NDaATL · Post #3 » by **NDaATL** » Tue May 15, 2007 4:30 am

I think every team should play every team, that way every division has the same opponents. Be more like the NBA and it would kill this discussion.

A-Town Connection · Post #4 » by **A-Town Connection** » Wed May 16, 2007 1:49 pm

he is correct

Mardy2Curry · Post #5 » by **Mardy2Curry** » Thu May 17, 2007 3:33 pm

NDaATL wrote:I think every team should play every team, that way every division has the same opponents. Be more like the NBA and it would kill this discussion.

Than it would take away from the divisional games that matter the most. But it would make for a good idea or even better out with the whole interleague play.

NDaATL · Post #6 » by **NDaATL** » Fri May 18, 2007 12:08 am

Mardy2Curry wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Than it would take away from the divisional games that matter the most. But it would make for a good idea or even better out with the whole interleague play.

As long as everyone played at least 1 three game series with every AL team, it would be fair. Just switch home field every season. They could still schedule about 15-20 games for each of our division rivals.

Mardy2Curry · Post #7 » by **Mardy2Curry** » Mon May 21, 2007 6:17 pm

Schedule would pan out this way for all NL East teams:

Interleague = 42 Games
Interdivision = 76 Games (19 games per)
Rest of NL = 44 Games

Which really wouldn't work, the way its set now it works but just make sure the entire division play the same teams. For instance NL East vs AL East or AL Central etc...