Page 1 of 1
Boston wants Mark Teixeira?
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:06 pm
by HMFFL
680 the fan was saying that Boston is offering four of their top prospects for Mark Teixeira! I say it's time to move him before he leaves us during the offseason.
Re: Boston wants Mark Teixeira?
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 2:05 am
by dms269
Any idea who they might be?
Re: Boston wants Mark Teixeira?
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 2:34 am
by HMFFL
uga_dawgs24 wrote:Any idea who they might be?
No, sorry. They didn't mention and jumped right to how they don't want CoCo Crisp.
Re: Boston wants Mark Teixeira?
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:01 pm
by MagicMadness
I'm curious to know who the prospects are.
Considering odds are against us re-signing Teixeira, I think the Braves should be looking at willing trade partners.
Re: Boston wants Mark Teixeira?
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:23 pm
by lpsevier
Masterson perhaps?
Re: Boston wants Mark Teixeira?
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:57 am
by Retrovision
action and get something, or sit and get nothing
Re: Boston wants Mark Teixeira?
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:59 pm
by bravesatl
ellsbury, lester, and masterson would be very nice....we'd better be getting back atleast 1 of those....
Re: Boston wants Mark Teixeira?
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:39 am
by Celtics_Champs
Gammons also mentioned the rumor. And the Boston Globe reported that you guys offered Tex for Youk and Craig Hansen.
Theo Epstein denied the report.
Re: Boston wants Mark Teixeira?
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:26 pm
by lpsevier
Oh god I hope not.
Re: Boston wants Mark Teixeira?
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:55 pm
by bravesatl
i dont like the youk, hansen deal either....i think we should trade him to LAA
adenhart+kotchman+figgins for tex+ohman?
Re: Boston wants Mark Teixeira?
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 6:53 pm
by cucad8
I think a lot of these deals are undervaluing Tex, IMO.
Re: Boston wants Mark Teixeira?
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:24 pm
by lpsevier
CC took the Brewers best offensive prospect, and I wonder if we could expect the same in return for Mark.
Probably not.