ImageImageImageImage

If The sox Inquire about Rich Harde Again

BS007
Banned User
Posts: 2,922
And1: 0
Joined: May 31, 2006

If The sox Inquire about Rich Harde Again 

Post#1 » by BS007 » Thu May 24, 2007 3:50 pm

The following names would be thrown out there in trade talks:
Jon Lester
Clay Buchholz
Michael Bowden
Jacoby Ellsbury
David Murphy
Brandon Moss
Coco Crisp
Wily Mo Pena
Craig Hansen
Manny Delcarmen

My thoughts are as follows in discussion of a trade with Oakland:

Harden, like Beckett is a young guy in his own right, so i wouldn't mind dealing away prospects for him. However, the Sox will not deal Jon Lester. Your right the Sox won't trade Ellsbury, the Sox are grooming him to replace Manny. But as you said Moss and Murphy could go. I would love to see Pena go, but trading Crisp could open the door for Pena in Boston. The only pitcher in Triple A i wouldn't trade is Clay Bucholz.

A deal i might do would that would help Oakland the most while allowing the Sox to keep a couple good prospects would be: Moss, Pena, Bowden for Harden
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#2 » by Bleeding Green » Thu May 24, 2007 4:31 pm

Why god why?

I'd rather just call up Buchholz right now than trade a bluechip prospect for a pitcher who will never go more than 140-150 innings in a season.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#3 » by Basketball Jesus » Thu May 24, 2007 4:33 pm

Hansen/Moss sounds like a reasonable offer.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,546
And1: 7,971
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

 

Post#4 » by Celtics_Champs » Thu May 24, 2007 5:21 pm

The sox didnt inquire first though, did they? I belive oakland called them. Oakland wanting to get rid of harden doesnt really get me excited about the pitcher. I would rather just keep our prospects.
User avatar
Chach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,330
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 23, 2003

 

Post#5 » by Chach » Thu May 24, 2007 5:49 pm

Harden and Beckett are two entirely different cases. Beckett has spent most of his time on the DL due to blister related issues. If memory serves me right, this is his 10th trip to the DL and 7 of them have been related to his middle finger and skin. One was an oblique strain and I want to say another was a quad strain.

Harden missed almost all of last season with lower back and elbow problems. He's on the DL this year because of shoulder strain/impingement. He had to go as far as visiting Dr. Lewis Yocum this season, who is like the Dr. James Andrews for shoulder injuries. He has had structural issues and while he hasn't needed surgery yet, I think there is a legitimate fear of acquiring him and needing to pay the bill for him that have his shoulder scoped. If he was having elbow issues, I might for it. But that shoulder is a tricky beast and when I hear that a pitcher is having issues with his, that's when I start to worry. I'd be all for trading for him but you know that Beane is going to charge and arm and a leg for him so I really don't see the trade being worth it. mahalo
~Chach~
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,744
And1: 228
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#6 » by sunshinekids99 » Thu May 24, 2007 5:58 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:Hansen/Moss sounds like a reasonable offer.


Agreed, my first thought was Murphy or Moss with one of the relief pitchers.
Image

Return to Boston Red Sox