ImageImageImageImage

Julio Lugo so far

User avatar
Flaming Mo
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 23,334
And1: 225
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Location: Germany
     

Julio Lugo so far 

Post#1 » by Flaming Mo » Tue May 15, 2007 10:03 pm

Ok, with all the hype around Dice-K and the satisfaction with the Red Sox start to the season, one player mostly gets overlooked even though he also was on the list of high priced offseason aquisitions: Julio Lugo.

He has hit 2 homers, 23 RBIs and he has already stolen 12 bases. While his average and his OBP% could be better, I think we can still be happy with his offensive production. He can get runners in and he can make something happen on the bases. I don't have his pitches per plate appearance rate but I think he's fine there too.

His offense was never really the question with him I guess and his defense has been shaky at best so far. I think though that he's a perfect fit for our team and considering we have mainly flyball pitchers on the staff anyways, I wouldn't really consider his D a problem. He truly gives us a bat in the order which helps us to score with the big time offenses like New York or Toronto and this certainly can't be overlooked by evaluating Lugo...
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#2 » by Bleeding Green » Thu May 17, 2007 5:10 am

He's been pretty terrible so far, but I expect he'll do significantly better as the season wears on. He's not going to hit .258/.321/.371 over a full season. I expect something like .300/.350/.430, which would be excellent.

I don't like him as a leadoff hitter at all, though.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
User avatar
Flaming Mo
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 23,334
And1: 225
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Location: Germany
     

 

Post#3 » by Flaming Mo » Thu May 17, 2007 5:14 pm

Bleeding Green wrote:He's been pretty terrible so far, but I expect he'll do significantly better as the season wears on. He's not going to hit .258/.321/.371 over a full season. I expect something like .300/.350/.430, which would be excellent.

I don't like him as a leadoff hitter at all, though.


Yeah his averages so far truly suck but as you said, he will come around. His base stealing though looks good and he can drive in some runs which is a plus from the shortstop position in comparison to last year.
BS007
Banned User
Posts: 2,922
And1: 0
Joined: May 31, 2006

 

Post#4 » by BS007 » Sat May 19, 2007 4:39 am

Lugo has never had a .300+ average to my recollection.. his carrer average is somewere between .270-.280 i believe.. he isn't a guy who hits for high averages
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#5 » by Bleeding Green » Sat May 19, 2007 4:54 am

He hit .295 in 2005 and .308 in half a season in Tampa last year.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
BS007
Banned User
Posts: 2,922
And1: 0
Joined: May 31, 2006

 

Post#6 » by BS007 » Sun May 20, 2007 2:11 am

I don't care about 2005 or a half year.... historically, he isn't near .300, which in my opinon you want a leadoff hitter to have for an average
BS007
Banned User
Posts: 2,922
And1: 0
Joined: May 31, 2006

 

Post#7 » by BS007 » Sun May 20, 2007 2:12 am

I don't care about 2005 or a half year.... historically, he isn't near .300, which in my opinon you want a leadoff hitter to have for an average
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#8 » by Basketball Jesus » Sun May 20, 2007 12:52 pm

Julio Lugo:Theo Epstein::Robert Swift:Danny Ainge
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#9 » by sunshinekids99 » Sun May 20, 2007 1:40 pm

BS007 wrote:I don't care about 2005 or a half year.... historically, he isn't near .300, which in my opinon you want a leadoff hitter to have for an average


Average is pretty useless to judge how well Lugo is doing. He needs to pick up his OBP. I don't care how he gets on base, he just needs to do it at a better clip.
Image
BS007
Banned User
Posts: 2,922
And1: 0
Joined: May 31, 2006

 

Post#10 » by BS007 » Sun May 20, 2007 2:41 pm

^^ True... i'm also worried about his defense holding up
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#11 » by Bleeding Green » Tue Jun 5, 2007 6:24 am

.224/.287/.327

Where is Alex Cora? It's June and Lugo has a 614 OPS.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#12 » by Basketball Jesus » Tue Jun 5, 2007 12:32 pm

Gee, didn't see this coming.


[/green font]
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#13 » by 34Celtic » Tue Jun 5, 2007 1:26 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:Julio Lugo:Theo Epstein::Robert Swift:Danny Ainge


:rofl:
cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

 

Post#14 » by cmaff051 » Tue Jun 5, 2007 4:44 pm

And really the worst part about signing Julio Lugo is that he took your first round pick away in a LOADED, LOADED 2007 MLB Draft.
The Rondo Show
Analyst
Posts: 3,588
And1: 327
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

 

Post#15 » by The Rondo Show » Tue Jun 5, 2007 7:33 pm

cmaff051 wrote:And really the worst part about signing Julio Lugo is that he took your first round pick away in a LOADED, LOADED 2007 MLB Draft.
Not really. While it is nice to have an awesome minor league system, the MLB team is far more important.

The Red Sox will still have 2 supp. 1st rounders from Gonzalez and Foulke (LOL! Thanks Keith...) and have actually had more success drafting there or later than in the regular 1st round recently. They'll get some good to great prospects this draft and with no 1st rounder they can always use that 1st round money to pick a guy who falls due to signability issues (see: Lars Anderson '06) and give them the 1st round money they want.

The worst part is that Lugo sucks at baseball right now, is posting an OBP well below .300, is average to slightly above average (considering position) when he is playing like he usually does and he gets a 4 year, $36M deal out of it.
BS007
Banned User
Posts: 2,922
And1: 0
Joined: May 31, 2006

 

Post#16 » by BS007 » Wed Jun 6, 2007 2:16 pm

a .225 average a .290 OBP, mediocre defense... just complete crap, i don't care if he is 18/18 in steals or has 33 RBI, the guy sucks
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#17 » by sunshinekids99 » Wed Jun 6, 2007 5:28 pm

I thought he's been good defensively not sure if the numbers back it up tho. He needs to be moved lower in the order and see if he can pick it up that way.
Image
BS007
Banned User
Posts: 2,922
And1: 0
Joined: May 31, 2006

 

Post#18 » by BS007 » Thu Jun 7, 2007 3:30 pm

sunshinekids99 wrote:I thought he's been good defensively not sure if the numbers back it up tho. He needs to be moved lower in the order and see if he can pick it up that way.


Like 8th? And have Peds bat leadoff?
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#19 » by sunshinekids99 » Thu Jun 7, 2007 5:34 pm

8th seems like the logical choice. But then you have Lugo and Crisp going back to back...and that's not pretty either.
Image
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#20 » by Bleeding Green » Thu Jun 7, 2007 11:18 pm

So Lugo cost the Red Sox Rick Porcello and a perfect game.

Sparkling.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.

Return to Boston Red Sox