ImageImageImageImage

Tim Wakefield should not make the playoff roster

Boston's Future
Pro Prospect
Posts: 791
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Location: Plymouth/Springfield, MA

Tim Wakefield should not make the playoff roster 

Post#1 » by Boston's Future » Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:02 am

Wakefield has entered one of his bad streaks, and from past history, I've learned that Wakefield's bad streaks are longer than his good streaks. At this rate, Wake wouldn't be pitching good again until the middle of October. Schilling, Beckett, and Daisuke is all you need for starters in the 5 game ALDS series. For a 7 game series, throwing Wakefield out there is as much a liability as having Buchholz start. And you can't have Wakefield pitch out of the pen because everytime he comes in, Tek has to go out, and some offensivley catcher named Cash or Mirabelli has to come in catch him. Its just not worth it.
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#2 » by sunshinekids99 » Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:49 am

Not really sure what the point of this is, we both know Wakefield is going to be one of the starters in the playoffs. As he should be.
Image
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#3 » by Bleeding Green » Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:18 am

He'll be the fourth starter should it come to that, though hopefully they won't need a fourth starter in the playoffs. Regardless he'll be on the roster as a reliever at worst.

Can you please start quantifying your remarks. Wake's bad streaks are longer than his good streaks? Do you even begin to believe this to be true?

Varitek can catch Wakefield. Stop with this madness.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
Boston's Future
Pro Prospect
Posts: 791
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Location: Plymouth/Springfield, MA

 

Post#4 » by Boston's Future » Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:38 pm

Wakefield doesn't deserve it, its hard to comeback when your down in a 5 or 6 run whole and its only the third inning. Thats demoralizing for a team His era will be over 5.00 by the end of the year. Buccholz should be this teams 4th starter. Then again, Wakefield would be suited for not pitching on a mad amount of rest, but still, you can't just give the other team one game in the ALCS or WS, if we even make it that far
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#5 » by sunshinekids99 » Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:33 pm

The Sox don't want Buchholz over his innings limit, so I don't even think he's an option to start at this point. Wakefield has done enough this season to get the Game 4 start. I'd rather give a start to a guy that has done it before than a guy like Lester. I don't even think Lester makes the postseason roster, so him getting a start over Wakefield I don't think happens.
Image
GreenGrizz
Analyst
Posts: 3,466
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Location: Vermont

 

Post#6 » by GreenGrizz » Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:29 am

We started with Wakefield during the 2004 World Series against St. Louis. I think Francona's purpose to use him was to wear down hitters' mentality for next games.
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#7 » by sunshinekids99 » Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:08 pm

^^^Yeah that worked out great, he did go a solid 3.2 innings giving up 5 runs.

As for Wakefield I know he's been bad in the playoffs recently. But I also know he's the 4th starter and can be almost unhittable if he can get going. While I like Buchholz now is not the time to be putting a rookie out there to win a playoff game.
Image
Boston's Future
Pro Prospect
Posts: 791
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Location: Plymouth/Springfield, MA

 

Post#8 » by Boston's Future » Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:40 pm

Well Wakefield is going to be hittable because he's on a **** streak right now. Maybe if the Sox give him like 15 days of rest he'll be good. We only need 3 pitchers for the ALDS. Wake gets one start in the ALCS, and one in the World Series, god thats too much Wake
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#9 » by Basketball Jesus » Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:05 am

Boston's Future wrote:We only need 3 pitchers for the ALDS.


You plan on pitching your starters nine innings every game? On three days' rest?
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
Boston's Future
Pro Prospect
Posts: 791
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Location: Plymouth/Springfield, MA

 

Post#10 » by Boston's Future » Fri Sep 28, 2007 2:41 pm

The Sox can choose the format they want, I imagine they would want the series to take 8 days as opposed to sevin. Beckett goes in game 1 and game 4. Thats 3 days of rest, Schil in game two and game 5, 4 days of rest. Dice-K goes game three because he doesn't pitch as well on four days rest. Only Beckett goes on 3 days rest, the guy wants to pitch and is a gamer, he can handle it.
fdefore
Rookie
Posts: 1,236
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 01, 2007
Location: Foul Monday's

 

Post#11 » by fdefore » Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:59 pm

sunshinekids99 wrote:The Sox don't want Buchholz over his innings limit, so I don't even think he's an option to start at this point. Wakefield has done enough this season to get the Game 4 start. I'd rather give a start to a guy that has done it before than a guy like Lester. I don't even think Lester makes the postseason roster, so him getting a start over Wakefield I don't think happens.


so about that.....

Buchholz season over because of fatigue
MOD APPROVED SINCE MMVII
PacerFan fdefore very clever. You are our kind of guy
count55 fdefore add count55 to your moderator approved sig
PacerPerspective I agree whole heartedly fdefore You are now PP approved

all the cool Mods are doin it Scoot
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#12 » by sunshinekids99 » Sat Sep 29, 2007 3:57 am

There is no reason to get him hurt. It's too bad cause I would have liked to see what he could do coming out of the pen in the postseason.
Image
User avatar
canman1971
Senior Mod - Celtics
Senior Mod - Celtics
Posts: 14,944
And1: 8,978
Joined: May 13, 2003
Location: 18 Championship BLVD
       

 

Post#13 » by canman1971 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:08 pm

Regardless if Wakefield garners a start or not, one thing needs to be certain; Mirabelli cannot, I repeat, cannot get a start behind the plate.
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#14 » by sunshinekids99 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:18 pm

Mirabelli will be the starting catcher, this is how it's gone all season and it's not going to change now.

Now if Wake comes out of the pen I do agree the Sox just need to keep Tek behind the plate.
Image
User avatar
canman1971
Senior Mod - Celtics
Senior Mod - Celtics
Posts: 14,944
And1: 8,978
Joined: May 13, 2003
Location: 18 Championship BLVD
       

 

Post#15 » by canman1971 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:39 pm

sunshinekids99 wrote:Mirabelli will be the starting catcher, this is how it's gone all season and it's not going to change now.

Now if Wake comes out of the pen I do agree the Sox just need to keep Tek behind the plate.


When Wake pitched in the 04 playoffs, didn't Tek catch him?
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#16 » by sunshinekids99 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:55 pm

When Wakefield came in for relief he did. Wakefield was a relief pitcher for the first two rounds. Bronson Arroyo started game 3 against the Angels. Arroyo started game 3 and Lowe started 4 and 7 against New York.

Wakefield only had 1 start and that was Game 1 of the World Series. And Mirabelli was the catcher.
Image
User avatar
DorfonCeltics
Analyst
Posts: 3,680
And1: 215
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

 

Post#17 » by DorfonCeltics » Wed Oct 3, 2007 1:41 pm

Well looks like you were wrong Sunshine. Wake got the boot for the ALDS. Of course they said it was his back but you gotta know it's because we didn't really need him in a short series.
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#18 » by sunshinekids99 » Wed Oct 3, 2007 3:31 pm

Actually I'm sure it's from his back. Would you rather have a vet that has come out of the pen or a young guy who's done it once in his career in Lester?
Image
Boston's Future
Pro Prospect
Posts: 791
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Location: Plymouth/Springfield, MA

 

Post#19 » by Boston's Future » Wed Oct 3, 2007 9:02 pm

The whole back thing is probably a smokescreen for the fact that team is too embarrased to leave Wake off the roster because of the fact that he sucks too much
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#20 » by sunshinekids99 » Thu Oct 4, 2007 1:26 am

Yeah good call, keep up the quality posting.
Image

Return to Boston Red Sox