Page 1 of 1

2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:51 pm
by hermes
figured since its getting close to july rumors could start creeping up here and there, so we can talk about it all here

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/941 ... -mlb-teams
got inspired by this

Code: Select all

Does any team have more quality trade chips and more motivation to cash them in than the Cubs? Consider:

Matt Garza: The 29-year-old right-hander spent the first seven weeks on the DL. He mixed good results with bad in his first five starts, including a nine-run debacle against the Reds on June 11. He's looked like the Garza of old in two starts since, striking out 13 batters, walking just four, and allowing just one run and seven hits over 15 innings. Two and a half years ago, the Rays landed two premium prospects and a total of five players in a deal for Garza and two throw-ins. Now he's three months away from free agency and will thus fetch much less in trade. But if Garza keeps pitching like he has in his past two starts, or even approaches what he did in 2011, he'll attract plenty of suitors.

Scott Feldman: Another walk-year starting pitcher, Feldman earned that status thanks to a lack of interest last winter that allowed the Cubs to land him on a dirt-cheap, one-year, $6 million deal. Though he's stumbled a bit lately, Feldman's still on pace for a better-than-average season, sporting a 3.39 ERA and 3.91 FIP, inducing enough ground balls, and showing strong enough control to overcome a lack of swing-and-miss stuff. If Feldman's still a Cub on August 1, someone out there probably didn't try hard enough.

Nate Schierholtz: He's 29 years old, he's raking to the tune of .296/.347/.558, he mashes right-handed pitching, he's an above-average defender, he's only owed about $1.2 million for the rest of the season, and he still offers a year of team control after this one. Though he's by no means a big-name player, you might not find three other players anywhere who'll get dealt at the deadline and make a bigger impact than Schierholtz could.

There's plenty more here, whether it's a relief-starved team buying into Kevin Gregg's unlikely resurrection, Luis Valbuena offering low-cost, high-OBP help to teams who need upgrades at second or third base, or David DeJesus offering a diversified skill set in the outfield, assuming he can come off the DL sometime soon.

With this much available talent and plenty of desire to sell, the Cubs could be the busiest team in the league over the next few weeks.


so any initial thoughts? are we going to be one of the busiest teams? what should we be looking to get done over the next month+

edit- updated trades (as of 7/2)

7/2 trades-
cubs receive: pedro strop, jake arrieta, and international bonus slots 3 and 4
orioles receive: scott feldman, steve clevenger

cubs receive: matt guerrier
dodgers receive: carlos marmol, international bonus slot 4

cubs receive: international bonus slots 2 and 3
astros receive: ronald torreyes (in minors)

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 9:07 pm
by ChronicKerr
Trade for David Price!!!!

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 5:35 pm
by HBK9
They just designated Marmol.

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 5:52 pm
by Posey H8er
It'll be difficult to find a trade partner for Marmol. We also released Ian Stewart.

http://espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/story/_/ ... t-released

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 6:54 pm
by HBK9
I don't think they can. He is terrible and I am talking about his stuff not about all the other things. Too bad they pulled out of the Angels deal.

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 5:32 pm
by ChronicKerr
HBK9 wrote:I don't think they can. He is terrible and I am talking about his stuff not about all the other things. Too bad they pulled out of the Angels deal.


At the time I was really hoping for the Cubs to get Haren in that deal but after seeing him throw this year I don't regret it much. Haren has been putrid all season long and appears to pretty much be done. He was making quite a bit more than Marmol (each on their last year in the deal) so not a huge loss, really. The time to trade Marmol was 2-3 years ago when he was looking like one of the top relievers in the game and coulda fetched a pretty penny. Held a bit too long here.

I'm mostly bitter about signing E-Jax over upping the offer to Sanchez just a bit. That one stings.

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Mon Jul 8, 2013 11:30 pm
by hermes

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Tue Jul 9, 2013 5:57 am
by Air Poohdini
I wouldn't mind keeping Garza, but I still think he'll be traded.

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Tue Jul 9, 2013 1:07 pm
by hermes
http://baseball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_ ... oposition/
its about 50/50

i can see him still wanting out, we've been trying to trade him for over a year

maybe this is all a ploy to get more out of a team

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 3:19 am
by hermes

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 1:04 am
by hermes
http://baseball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_ ... amardzija/
listening to talks for shark? i thought they were building the staff around him?

http://baseball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_ ... with_cubs/
and nate wants to stay, i like him - think he's got a shot at sticking around?

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:23 pm
by GYBE
I think Schierholtz is probably gone. Along with maybe Gregg, he's the only guy that could deliver an actual prospect.

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 2:04 pm
by hermes
http://baseball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_ ... ub_traded/
yeah seems the next guy to potentially go is schierholtz

too bad since he really seems to like it here and wants to stay

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 6:49 pm
by Badbeats
I think the front office has done a good job so far but we need to move more players.

Jackson/Gregg deal to Atl would be fantastic. They need a SP since Hudson went down and are looking for bullpen help.

Schierholtz/Navarro to TB would also make sense. They have a great farm system and both of these players would not break the bank. They could use the upgrade at catcher and were looking for a LH bat.

Dejesus/Russell to Oakland. They could also look at Nate and Russell. They have a lot of OF's who are not hitting. They also were looking for some LH relief in the pen.

Come on Front Office... 1 hour left lets move some players!

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:32 pm
by hermes
doesn't seem like we made any more moves


although we did deny trading navarro to the cards, good for us - don't want to be helping out the redbirds

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread

Posted: Thu Aug 1, 2013 4:09 am
by karch34
Kind of glad we didn't trade Schierholtz. He's the kind of guy I'd like to keep around on a young team if he doesn't command too much money.