ImageImageImage

Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread)

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,192
And1: 14,949
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2001 » by bucknersrevenge » Wed Jan 6, 2016 7:26 pm

Pacino62 wrote:
Green89 wrote:
lon3lytoaster wrote:Who's got a scoring 4 we can acquire without giving up a BKN pick? I'm falling real short on solutions for this one.

I think Jae is developing into a more than adequate SF for us. He's probsbly our 1B to Thomas' 1A. Need the 4 spot to be upgraded real bad.


There are only 3 power forwards scoring over 20PPG in the league, Cousins, Davis, and Griffin. Only 8 others scoring over 15PPG and all of them are probably staying put. Faried, Noel, and Randolph are probably the only 3 I can think of who average between 10-15PPG that may be available. Not very much out there.


Keef could definitely score 15-18 per in a different situation. His brothers doing it in Detroit and was considered the far lesser talented brother.


If you look at simply the skillset, Kieff has the postgame of a go-to guy. He can get off a shot pretty much whenever he wants. He has the game to be an effective inside-out scorer and before all this happened, he was on an upward trajectory as far as that is concerned. But obviously we can't just look at that. There are clearly a lot of warts here all which have been hashed out ad nauseum. It comes down to whether Ainge wants to take the chance on a guy with a low salary and see if Stevens can build him up.
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
jinx8402
Sophomore
Posts: 113
And1: 138
Joined: Jul 21, 2012

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2002 » by jinx8402 » Wed Jan 6, 2016 7:50 pm

Not sure how high any one is on him, or if he is even remotely available, but would anybody do something like this:

CJ McCollum/Kaman

for

Bradley/Zeller/Non BKLYN 1st

Too much from a C's perspective? Not nearly enough to entice Portland?
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 41,495
And1: 25,056
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2003 » by Curmudgeon » Wed Jan 6, 2016 7:55 pm

Just Bradley for McCollum. I wouldn't give much more, cetainly not a first rounder. McCollum is playing extremely well right now, but there's no assurance that he isn't a flash in the pan.
The salaries don't have to match since Portland is so far under the cap.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
User avatar
Murta
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,644
And1: 1,823
Joined: Feb 11, 2012
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
     

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2004 » by Murta » Wed Jan 6, 2016 7:58 pm

Buy low, sell high, not the other way around. I proposed 4-5 different trade scenarios last season for McCollum, but there's no way I'd trade for him now.
User avatar
FakeScreenName123
RealGM
Posts: 14,176
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jul 09, 2003
Location: Town

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2005 » by FakeScreenName123 » Wed Jan 6, 2016 8:00 pm

jinx8402 wrote:Not sure how high any one is on him, or if he is even remotely available, but would anybody do something like this:

CJ McCollum/Kaman

for

Bradley/Zeller/Non BKLYN 1st

Too much from a C's perspective? Not nearly enough to entice Portland?



not nearly enough to entice portland. CJs their 2nd best player by far, him and lillard are awesome together and they have him under a good rookie deal. And he's really really really good.
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 41,495
And1: 25,056
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2006 » by Curmudgeon » Wed Jan 6, 2016 8:15 pm

Actually, Bradley would be better to cover up some of Lillard's defensive deficiencies. The Celtics are trading defense for offense here.

Portland is also way below the 90% salary floor, so McCollum's "good rookie deal" isn't nearly as helpful for the Blazers as it would be to a team with a higher payroll.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West

"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells

"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,022
And1: 3,891
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2007 » by BleedGreen1989 » Wed Jan 6, 2016 8:18 pm

Writebloc wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:
Ed Pinkney wrote:


Yikes, in which universe is Ryan Anderson worth two decent rotation players AND a first round pick that could be in the top half of the first round? That guy is four or five years past his best basketball and was never that amazing to begin with. The Celtics should be putting in the second round pick and getting back the first rounder.


I'm not saying I'd do the trade, but this is factually incorrect.


In what way? I would say that he suffered a major injury last year and he hasn't fully recovered from it. His best year was either in Orlando or his first year with New Orleans.


He's essentially matching that best year you're referring too.

Was off to a career season two years ago (not last year) before Gerald Wallace decided to "hit stick" him. Took last year to recover.

He's only 27 years old.
User avatar
FakeScreenName123
RealGM
Posts: 14,176
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jul 09, 2003
Location: Town

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2008 » by FakeScreenName123 » Wed Jan 6, 2016 8:25 pm

Curmudgeon wrote:Actually, Bradley would be better to cover up some of Lillard's defensive deficiencies. The Celtics are trading defense for offense here.

Portland is also way below the 90% salary floor, so McCollum's "good rookie deal" isn't nearly as helpful for the Blazers as it would be to a team with a higher payroll.



Actually, CJ would be a better combination for Lillard because they lack scoring at other positions outside of their backcourt. CJ is averaging 20 + and shooting 40% from 3 on high volume. It's not defense for offense trade that's 1:1. Also CJ isn't a terrible defender.

Your value system for how you evaluate players has always been ****non-conventional**** but you enjoy that, so I suggest you suggest a Bradley for CJ trade straight up on the blazers board.

"Good rookie deals" are always better for any team that is in the lottery and not winning anything anytime soon.
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,089
And1: 5,448
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2009 » by skywalker33 » Wed Jan 6, 2016 8:30 pm

Curmudgeon wrote:Actually, Bradley would be better to cover up some of Lillard's defensive deficiencies. The Celtics are trading defense for offense here.

Portland is also way below the 90% salary floor, so McCollum's "good rookie deal" isn't nearly as helpful for the Blazers as it would be to a team with a higher payroll.


Perhaps, but McCollum is scoring at 21ppg while Bradley is about at his peak at 15ppg. Bradley's defense is superior, but his game is what it is with little room for improvement while McCollum has that higher ceiling showing with more playing time. No way POR trades him straight up for Bradley IMO.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 41,495
And1: 25,056
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2010 » by Curmudgeon » Wed Jan 6, 2016 8:36 pm

Who knows what Portland will do? IMHO Stotts deserves serious COY consideration for winning as many games as he has with that roster.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West

"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells

"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
Ben-N1ce
RealGM
Posts: 21,730
And1: 20,086
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
       

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2011 » by Ben-N1ce » Wed Jan 6, 2016 8:37 pm

There is no way they get CJ for Bradley. The 6 game stretch Lilliard was out CJ put up 26/6.5/6.5 quite frankly I think it's damn near impossible for Bradley to average that for any stretch in his entire career since he can't get his own and him even getting 6 assists in any game is something he has pulled off probably less than 5 times in his whole career nevermind for a week or two.
User avatar
Stadium5
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,863
And1: 3,556
Joined: May 04, 2013

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2012 » by Stadium5 » Wed Jan 6, 2016 8:44 pm

Bradley isnt even in CJ's league and CJ is younger. They'd laugh at us
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,108
And1: 14,946
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2013 » by 165bows » Wed Jan 6, 2016 8:49 pm

How about something like this for Orl/Tor:

Ross/picks/rookie contract guys to Orlando for Fournier/Frye

Orlando clears out its wing log jam and Toronto fills SF for this year, then PF next year by moving Carroll to PF.
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,022
And1: 3,891
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2014 » by BleedGreen1989 » Wed Jan 6, 2016 9:12 pm

165bows wrote:How about something like this for Orl/Tor:

Ross/picks/rookie contract guys to Orlando for Fournier/Frye

Orlando clears out its wing log jam and Toronto fills SF for this year, then PF next year by moving Carroll to PF.


"Picks" better be very good from TOR.

Evan Fournier is considerably better and more versatile.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,108
And1: 14,946
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2015 » by 165bows » Wed Jan 6, 2016 9:29 pm

BleedGreen1989 wrote:
165bows wrote:How about something like this for Orl/Tor:

Ross/picks/rookie contract guys to Orlando for Fournier/Frye

Orlando clears out its wing log jam and Toronto fills SF for this year, then PF next year by moving Carroll to PF.


"Picks" better be very good from TOR.

Evan Fournier is considerably better and more versatile.

They should have a late lotto pick from NY plus another extra. Maybe swap Fournier for Gordon even. Just seems like some fit is there.
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 41,495
And1: 25,056
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2016 » by Curmudgeon » Wed Jan 6, 2016 11:00 pm

Stadium5 wrote:Bradley isnt even in CJ's league and CJ is younger. They'd laugh at us


When McCollum gets named to the NBA all star team or the all defensive team, send me a memo.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West

"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells

"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
DavorFanCroatia
Senior
Posts: 569
And1: 691
Joined: Feb 17, 2015
Location: Varazdin, Croatia
         

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2017 » by DavorFanCroatia » Wed Jan 6, 2016 11:09 pm

I don't believe Suns would do that but:
To PHO: Sullinger, Jerebko, Lee, BOS 2016 1st, DAL 2016 1 st and 2-3 second's
To BOS: Morris, Chandler, Price (waived), PHO 2016 1st

We took a big salary in Chandler, their cancer in Morris and for the trouble we get another top 5 pick. With little lotto luck we could get first and second picks in draft and add Simmons and Ingram and have a:
Smart / Thomas / Rozier
Bradley / Hunter / Young
Crowder / Ingram
Simmons / Morris / Johnson / Mickey
Chandler / Olynyk / Zeller
There's only one statistics that's important: who won...Bill Russell
truth18
RealGM
Posts: 38,601
And1: 42,854
Joined: Apr 17, 2011
Location: CELTICS NIGHTMARE

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2018 » by truth18 » Wed Jan 6, 2016 11:36 pm

Yo, we are well past 100 pages just FYI (not at home I can't make a new one)
YOU LOSE
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,017
And1: 27,900
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2019 » by Fencer reregistered » Wed Jan 6, 2016 11:43 pm

DavorFanCroatia wrote:I don't believe Suns would do that but:
To PHO: Sullinger, Jerebko, Lee, BOS 2016 1st, DAL 2016 1 st and 2-3 second's
To BOS: Morris, Chandler, Price (waived), PHO 2016 1st

We took a big salary in Chandler, their cancer in Morris and for the trouble we get another top 5 pick. With little lotto luck we could get first and second picks in draft and add Simmons and Ingram and have a:
Smart / Thomas / Rozier
Bradley / Hunter / Young
Crowder / Ingram
Simmons / Morris / Johnson / Mickey
Chandler / Olynyk / Zeller


What exactly is Phoenix getting for its unprotected first????
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,089
And1: 5,448
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: Trade Winds Cont. (2015-16 Trade Thread) 

Post#2020 » by skywalker33 » Wed Jan 6, 2016 11:52 pm

DavorFanCroatia wrote:I don't believe Suns would do that but:
To PHO: Sullinger, Jerebko, Lee, BOS 2016 1st, DAL 2016 1 st and 2-3 second's
To BOS: Morris, Chandler, Price (waived), PHO 2016 1st

We took a big salary in Chandler, their cancer in Morris and for the trouble we get another top 5 pick. With little lotto luck we could get first and second picks in draft and add Simmons and Ingram and have a:
Smart / Thomas / Rozier
Bradley / Hunter / Young
Crowder / Ingram
Simmons / Morris / Johnson / Mickey
Chandler / Olynyk / Zeller


PHX 2016 pick is very likely to be top 5-7, they aren't trading that pick for that......
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!

Return to Boston Celtics