ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,648
And1: 19,747
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1941 » by shrink » Fri Jul 1, 2022 2:35 pm

Now that KAT signed, we can’t legally trade for a player who signed a designated veteran deal like Simmons.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,558
And1: 31,019
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1942 » by Domejandro » Fri Jul 1, 2022 2:37 pm

Absolutely zero world where I would trade Anthony Edwards for Kevin Durant, despite being willing to fully mortgage everything outside of him and Karl-Anthony Towns. Realistically, another team likely beats out the D'Angelo Russell, Jaden McDaniels, and picks package I outlined (albeit I am not positive), but that is what I would consider.
TwolvesFanRome
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,434
And1: 666
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
Location: Roma
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1943 » by TwolvesFanRome » Fri Jul 1, 2022 2:37 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
TwolvesFanRome wrote:According to me the core (Ant Kat JMcD) is untouchable...Dlo Beasley are available...in my head too!

McD is touchable. :lol: :o


:roll: According to me we shouldn't give him away...
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."

Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,558
And1: 31,019
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1944 » by Domejandro » Fri Jul 1, 2022 2:38 pm

shrink wrote:Now that KAT signed, we can’t legally trade for a player who signed a designated veteran deal like Simmons.

For what it is worth, I thought that restriction was that you can't trade for two players that are on that extension; I think one signed and one traded for is fair game, if I am not mistaken.

I honestly could be wrong, though, the rule is confusing.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,472
And1: 5,995
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1945 » by winforlose » Fri Jul 1, 2022 2:45 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:Thought exercise - Brooklyn doesn't like Ayton apparently, and Miami doesn't work b/c Bam can't be traded with Simmons on the roster...revisit D'Lo for Simmons? We could even include Beasley if they want to get off of Joe Harris' extra year. Then include Prince to make up the salary difference, though I think the trade works either way. You could also do Vando if you were really high on Simmons.

Now Brooklyn can roll out: D'Lo/Beasley/O'Neale/Vando/Bam/Curry/Claxton/and of course David Duke.

That's pretty solid! right? RIGHT?


Literally cannot happen. KAT extension means Simmons cannot be traded here.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,472
And1: 5,995
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1946 » by winforlose » Fri Jul 1, 2022 2:50 pm

Baseline81 wrote:Krawczynski article:

https://theathletic.com/3393151/2022/07/01/wolves-free-agency-towns/?source=user-shared-article

They also continued their talks with Utah about Gobert, which have been on again and off again since before the draft. The Jazz are expected to drive a hard bargain for one of the best defensive players of this generation, but the Wolves remain interested in pairing him with Towns in a super-sized frontcourt. Other bigs who could be explored include Indiana’s Myles Turner and Atlanta's Clint Capela, though there has been very little traction between Minnesota and Atlanta over the last few weeks.


I am glad the Gobert talks have resumed. I guess the million dollar question is what does Utah want and what are we willing to give? It does sound like twin towers is the end game.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,043
And1: 6,061
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1947 » by Devilzsidewalk » Fri Jul 1, 2022 2:52 pm

Domejandro wrote:
shrink wrote:Now that KAT signed, we can’t legally trade for a player who signed a designated veteran deal like Simmons.

For what it is worth, I thought that restriction was that you can't trade for two players that are on that extension; I think one signed and one traded for is fair game, if I am not mistaken.

I honestly could be wrong, though, the rule is confusing.


that's what i thought too
Image
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1948 » by SO_MONEY » Fri Jul 1, 2022 2:55 pm

winforlose wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:Krawczynski article:

https://theathletic.com/3393151/2022/07/01/wolves-free-agency-towns/?source=user-shared-article

They also continued their talks with Utah about Gobert, which have been on again and off again since before the draft. The Jazz are expected to drive a hard bargain for one of the best defensive players of this generation, but the Wolves remain interested in pairing him with Towns in a super-sized frontcourt. Other bigs who could be explored include Indiana’s Myles Turner and Atlanta's Clint Capela, though there has been very little traction between Minnesota and Atlanta over the last few weeks.


I am glad the Gobert talks have resumed. I guess the million dollar question is what does Utah want and what are we willing to give? It does sound like twin towers is the end game.


If I were to guess it is more like what a team like CHI wants to ship out to Utah and what we might actually want that a team like that and give assets and use space for.
twolves31
Junior
Posts: 381
And1: 256
Joined: Jan 13, 2018
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1949 » by twolves31 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 2:56 pm

winforlose wrote:
Devilzsidewalk wrote:Thought exercise - Brooklyn doesn't like Ayton apparently, and Miami doesn't work b/c Bam can't be traded with Simmons on the roster...revisit D'Lo for Simmons? We could even include Beasley if they want to get off of Joe Harris' extra year. Then include Prince to make up the salary difference, though I think the trade works either way. You could also do Vando if you were really high on Simmons.

Now Brooklyn can roll out: D'Lo/Beasley/O'Neale/Vando/Bam/Curry/Claxton/and of course David Duke.

That's pretty solid! right? RIGHT?


Literally cannot happen. KAT extension means Simmons cannot be traded here.



It's called the Designated Rookie rule, and in this instance, it pertains not to Durant himself, but to current teammate Ben Simmons. The Designated Rookie rule allows teams to sign players coming off of rookie contracts to a five-year extension rather than the typical four. A team can designate up to two rookies for such contracts, but there's a caveat: only one of them can be acquired by trade. Simmons, himself on a five-year deal signed with Philadelphia, already occupies one of those slots

You can have up to 2 designated rookies on a team but only one can be traded for. We didn't trade for Kat so we could still trade for a Bam or Simmons. I believe Towns should be off his designated rookie extension come time to extend Ant. Dlo didn't get the designated rookie extension either.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,647
And1: 6,485
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1950 » by KGdaBom » Fri Jul 1, 2022 2:59 pm

TwolvesFanRome wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
TwolvesFanRome wrote:According to me the core (Ant Kat JMcD) is untouchable...Dlo Beasley are available...in my head too!

McD is touchable. :lol: :o


:roll: According to me we shouldn't give him away...

Absolutely we shouldn't "give" him away. However, if we can get a young star in a deal say Jayson Tatum I would be packing McDaniels bags and driving him to the airport.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,647
And1: 6,485
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1951 » by KGdaBom » Fri Jul 1, 2022 3:01 pm

shrink wrote:Now that KAT signed, we can’t legally trade for a player who signed a designated veteran deal like Simmons.

I thought we could trade KAT for Simmons? :roll:
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,472
And1: 5,995
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1952 » by winforlose » Fri Jul 1, 2022 3:01 pm

twolves31 wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Devilzsidewalk wrote:Thought exercise - Brooklyn doesn't like Ayton apparently, and Miami doesn't work b/c Bam can't be traded with Simmons on the roster...revisit D'Lo for Simmons? We could even include Beasley if they want to get off of Joe Harris' extra year. Then include Prince to make up the salary difference, though I think the trade works either way. You could also do Vando if you were really high on Simmons.

Now Brooklyn can roll out: D'Lo/Beasley/O'Neale/Vando/Bam/Curry/Claxton/and of course David Duke.

That's pretty solid! right? RIGHT?


Literally cannot happen. KAT extension means Simmons cannot be traded here.



It's called the Designated Rookie rule, and in this instance, it pertains not to Durant himself, but to current teammate Ben Simmons. The Designated Rookie rule allows teams to sign players coming off of rookie contracts to a five-year extension rather than the typical four. A team can designate up to two rookies for such contracts, but there's a caveat: only one of them can be acquired by trade. Simmons, himself on a five-year deal signed with Philadelphia, already occupies one of those slots

You can have up to 2 designated rookies on a team but only one can be traded for. We didn't trade for Kat so we could still trade for a Bam or Simmons. I believe Towns should be off his designated rookie extension come time to extend Ant. Dlo didn't get the designated rookie extension either.


Sounds plausible. Contrary to what I have been reading, but let’s assume this correct. Then the question is Dlo, Beasley, and Prince for Simmons. I am fine moving all 3 players but I wouldn’t touch Ben Simmons. I would be fine moving him to a third team if meant getting back significant value.
TwolvesFanRome
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,434
And1: 666
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
Location: Roma
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1953 » by TwolvesFanRome » Fri Jul 1, 2022 3:02 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
TwolvesFanRome wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:McD is touchable. :lol: :o


:roll: According to me we shouldn't give him away...

Absolutely we shouldn't "give" him away. However, if we can get a young star in a deal say Jayson Tatum I would be packing McDaniels bags and driving him to the airport.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

But I don't see a scenario like this my friend...

And, for example, I wouldn't pack him in a trade for Gobert/Turner/Ayton...

So we need to talk about what young stars are possible :roll:
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."

Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,647
And1: 6,485
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1954 » by KGdaBom » Fri Jul 1, 2022 3:03 pm

winforlose wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:Krawczynski article:

https://theathletic.com/3393151/2022/07/01/wolves-free-agency-towns/?source=user-shared-article

They also continued their talks with Utah about Gobert, which have been on again and off again since before the draft. The Jazz are expected to drive a hard bargain for one of the best defensive players of this generation, but the Wolves remain interested in pairing him with Towns in a super-sized frontcourt. Other bigs who could be explored include Indiana’s Myles Turner and Atlanta's Clint Capela, though there has been very little traction between Minnesota and Atlanta over the last few weeks.


I am glad the Gobert talks have resumed. I guess the million dollar question is what does Utah want and what are we willing to give? It does sound like twin towers is the end game.

I'm thinking Kessler would be in the deal for sure. I don't know what else. Russell to match salary.
TwolvesFanRome
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,434
And1: 666
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
Location: Roma
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1955 » by TwolvesFanRome » Fri Jul 1, 2022 3:04 pm

About Gobert I am all in with Dane Moore: look at Turner and not to him...
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."

Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,647
And1: 6,485
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1956 » by KGdaBom » Fri Jul 1, 2022 3:06 pm

TwolvesFanRome wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
TwolvesFanRome wrote:
:roll: According to me we shouldn't give him away...

Absolutely we shouldn't "give" him away. However, if we can get a young star in a deal say Jayson Tatum I would be packing McDaniels bags and driving him to the airport.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

But I don't see a scenario like this my friend...

And, for example, I wouldn't pack him in a trade for Gobert/Turner/Ayton...

So we need to talk about what young stars are possible :roll:

I think I've proved my point though. For the right offer we should trade McDaniels.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,472
And1: 5,995
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1957 » by winforlose » Fri Jul 1, 2022 3:08 pm

TwolvesFanRome wrote:About Gobert I am all in with Dane Moore: look at Turner and not to him...


When did he say this?
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1958 » by Nick K » Fri Jul 1, 2022 3:10 pm

shrink wrote:For fun. Suppose Durant was willing to come to MIN. He always liked the city when he’d visit his ex-fiancée.

Asking price is ANT … (and DLo, Beasley and a 1st).

We LOVE LOVE LOVE Ant, but this is Kevin Durant, first ballot Hall of Famer. Do ya?


No way and I love Durant. Durant is past his prime. Ant will be great for years to come.
TwolvesFanRome
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,434
And1: 666
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
Location: Roma
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1959 » by TwolvesFanRome » Fri Jul 1, 2022 3:16 pm

winforlose wrote:
TwolvesFanRome wrote:About Gobert I am all in with Dane Moore: look at Turner and not to him...


When did he say this?


Read on Twitter
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."

Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition 

Post#1960 » by Nick K » Fri Jul 1, 2022 3:18 pm

shrink wrote:We definitely need to look into a consolidation trade, to de-clutter the roster, and find minutes for others.

I think the five players the Wolves would shop hardest are

DLo. .. it looks like the most likely trade destinations chose someone else.
Naz .. like him, but he’d be more useful to a different team
Beasley .. I think he provides a valuable skill, but it sounds like they seek minutes for Nowell

Prince .. he has extra value here, but getting Kyle makes him expendable. Signing Wednesday made him trade eligible
Pat Bev .. another player with extra value here

Targets: big bruiser next to Towns, or a replacement PG is DLo or PatBev are dealt.


I'm thinking the exact same thing conceptually. I have no idea what they will do but they need to do something. My guess is they move Prince and Beasley.

I'm loving the new front office.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves