Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Kampuchea wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Kampuchea wrote:
Yes he is, he will thrive with open threes spacing the floor
Randle barely shot 30% on C&S 3's....
With no PG play resulting in low quality shots. Problem solved with Brunson
moocow007 wrote:Why else do you think Westbrook is still a Laker even though the Lakers have been trying to trade him for some time.
Chanel Bomber wrote:Kampuchea wrote:It’s like he wasn’t just all NBA a couple seasons ago.
He didn't really belong there though.
He was a good starter for the Knicks, who needed a playmaker to run the offense through, and he played well in that role.
But if any Knick deserved to make All-NBA, it was Derrick Rose.
Kampuchea wrote:It’s like he wasn’t just all NBA a couple seasons ago.
newyorker4ever wrote:moocow007 wrote:Juco24 wrote:Read that Lakers willing to include picks to take Westbrook... can we convey to Jazz? Just thinking...
The Lakers next 1st round pick that they can actually trade is in 2027. And we think the 1st round picks we got from OKC has little value? Yes, if you hate Julius Randle then yeah you can tell the Lakers to just keep the picks cause we hates him. But otherwise, those picks are **** value. Why else do you think Westbrook is still a Laker even though the Lakers have been trying to trade him for some time. Trading for Mitchell and signing Brunson makes the Knicks a here and now. Why trade your most talented player on the team for a couple low value 1st round picks?
Every 1st round pick is valuable.
mpharris36 wrote:stuporman wrote:mpharris36 wrote:man if leon can trade for mitch for 5-6 1sts and then get back 2 1sts from the lakers for Randle that would be some nice swindling
Not to mention after turning this draft's #11 into three 1sts and the cap space to sign Brunson. So Mitchell would only really cost them 2-3 1sts while also dumping Randle/Fournier plus adding Brunson/Hart.
If that is the Knicks off season there are very few fans or media that could justifiably criticize Rose especially if they were able to keep their youth, like RJ, Obi and IQ.
not exactly...the picks we got probably aren't going in the Mitchell trade.
It will be our own picks. Not every pick is created equal.
? DOT wrote:moocow007 wrote:Why else do you think Westbrook is still a Laker even though the Lakers have been trying to trade him for some time.
Because the Lakers don't want to trade picks 5 and 7 years from now just to dump Westbrook without making any meaningful improvement to their roster
Like, if you look at any of the rumors, they all say that teams are asking for the picks, and the Lakers aren't willing to give them up
The picks have value because nobody expects the Lakers to be any good in 5-7 years, the Lakers included, which is why teams are asking for them and they're not giving them up.
F N 11 wrote:
I been saying this since the Post game he didn’t seem to like Randle.
thebuzzardman wrote:ibraheim718 wrote:Donovan Mitchell's strength is attacking the basket.. Brunson's strength is operating in the paint with a live dribble and floaters. Think about it and explain to me how they complement each other.
Because all NBA teams only have one guy who can dribble a basketball towards the basket with any ability...
You've been watching the Knicks for too long.
stuporman wrote:mpharris36 wrote:stuporman wrote:
Not to mention after turning this draft's #11 into three 1sts and the cap space to sign Brunson. So Mitchell would only really cost them 2-3 1sts while also dumping Randle/Fournier plus adding Brunson/Hart.
If that is the Knicks off season there are very few fans or media that could justifiably criticize Rose especially if they were able to keep their youth, like RJ, Obi and IQ.
not exactly...the picks we got probably aren't going in the Mitchell trade.
It will be our own picks. Not every pick is created equal.
Both will, some NYK picks and some of the others. The picks that people are disregarding will actually wind up being better picks than the ones the Knicks give of their own. The Knicks ones will more likely be in the 20s and the other ones more likely in the teens.
The only different is in appearance, the 'unprotected' jizzing that fans, media and even Ainge will do over them probably won't translate into them being better picks than the ones that are coming from Wash and Det once the protections go down to a lower point they'll convey in the teens, not Mil one tho.
F N 11 wrote:Realistically how can we get Westbrook’s salary? Include Cam??
Stannis wrote:I'd even give Lakers a pick to get rid of Randle lol
DOT wrote:moocow007 wrote:Why else do you think Westbrook is still a Laker even though the Lakers have been trying to trade him for some time.
Because the Lakers don't want to trade picks 5 and 7 years from now just to dump Westbrook without making any meaningful improvement to their roster
Like, if you look at any of the rumors, they all say that teams are asking for the picks, and the Lakers aren't willing to give them up
The picks have value because nobody expects the Lakers to be any good in 5-7 years, the Lakers included, which is why teams are asking for them and they're not giving them up.
