mcfly1204 wrote:You have to keep in mind LeVert only played in 19 regular season games with the Cavs last season. He put up 5.2 3PA with Indiana, so I don't see 5 3PA being too unrealistic. Whether or not he can shoot it at a higher percentage is the real question to me. I think we are just going to have to agree to disagree on his playmaking abilities...
More than just that, he was being brought in in part because he was expected to click with Allen, and then Allen got hurt. Also LeVert got hurt and wasn't 100% the rest of the season (albeit LeVert @ 100% is a rare thing).
He's also played PG for stretches, dished out 10+ assists numerous times, maintains a 2:1 A/TO ration over his career.
But let's not turn this in to something it's not ... stating LeVert can contribute in numerous areas of need is not the same thing as stating he's was particularly good in those areas.
Also, let's try to avoid comparing apples to oranges?
Isaac shot very few 3's that weren't wide open and off a pass to the corner. Getting his 3pt% up to 35% was certainly progress for him, but what would his 3pt% has been if his shot selection included more tightly contested shots, shots from other spots, and shots he created for himself?
For example, LeVert is not anything special in terms of getting to the line, but he does average 5.3 trips per 100 over his career, Isaac is at 3.7 and Malik Beasley is at 2.2. Only LeVert's 5.3 is anywhere in the neighborhood of Sexton's 6.5.
Point is we don't really help the mess we have at SG by bringing in a specialist or a mediocre generalist. We either need to trade for someone who pushes the needle, or hope at least one of our numerous candidates improves as a player or at least in the role.
And given we're not even sure what this team needs most (besides Ricky back, healthy and able to sink 3's), what we really need is data.