AbC? wrote:
Bro... he exposed himself TO the psychologist!! Lawd
This is a whole new level of not being able to read the room. Just wow.
Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, Dirk, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

AbC? wrote:
Bro... he exposed himself TO the psychologist!! Lawd

Yuri Vaultin wrote:AbC? wrote:
Bro... he exposed himself TO the psychologist!! Lawd
This is a whole new level of not being able to read the room. Just wow.

HomoSapien wrote:Xatticus wrote:DwayneSchintzus wrote:
He’s like 6’6”, 215. If youre caught alone in a hotel room you are prob worried you are about to be raped.
These people were at work- not mardi gras. of course i wouldnt mind some woman flashing me. This is not the same thing.
Not everything is a “just rub some dirt on it” situation ffs.
I get the apples to oranges thing you are pointing out, but it's important to note that we charge people with what they actually do as opposed to another's fears of what they might do. If the latter were the case, there really wouldn't be many people free from incarceration.
Flashing your genitals without consent is considered legally to be indecent exposure. That's a crime and in most cases causes you to be registered as a sexual offender. I'm not sure what's difficult to understand about this.

Xatticus wrote:Or perhaps those that disagree with you aren't the ones displaying an ignorant worldview?
We all have mothers. If your mother was the pillar of virtue that you believe she is, you wouldn't be here to type your messages on an internet forum. Mothers aren't as naive as you think they are. They just pretend to be in front of their children. It's actually quite instrumental in the propagation of the species, ya know?
It's never a good thing when rational gives way to political. Border patrolling is a self-serving endeavor, don't think for a moment that others don't know this.
Personally, I find this collective reaction to be a far greater threat to society than one man's deviances. It is the mechanism by which a 19-year-old stumbling in an elevator turns into a massacre.
But if you are so bothered... you can all get together and form a committee. You can call it the Committee of Public Safety.
It's never a good thing when rational gives way to political. Border patrolling is a self-serving endeavor, don't think for a moment that others don't know this.
Personally, I find this collective reaction to be a far greater threat to society than one man's deviances. It is the mechanism by which a 19-year-old stumbling in an elevator turns into a massacre.
Capn'O wrote:Dick Tate wrote:I was shocked when the new Kids In The Hall started off their first episode with a couple of the actors fully exposed, jumping around with their johnsons swinging all over the place. Must be a Canadian thing...
KITH has new material???????
Well, I know how I'll be spending my night!
lol why would you ask him to write more stuff?Dirk wrote:Xatticus wrote:Or perhaps those that disagree with you aren't the ones displaying an ignorant worldview?
We all have mothers. If your mother was the pillar of virtue that you believe she is, you wouldn't be here to type your messages on an internet forum. Mothers aren't as naive as you think they are. They just pretend to be in front of their children. It's actually quite instrumental in the propagation of the species, ya know?
It's never a good thing when rational gives way to political. Border patrolling is a self-serving endeavor, don't think for a moment that others don't know this.
Personally, I find this collective reaction to be a far greater threat to society than one man's deviances. It is the mechanism by which a 19-year-old stumbling in an elevator turns into a massacre.
But if you are so bothered... you can all get together and form a committee. You can call it the Committee of Public Safety.
Please re-read your post and clarify the statement about the user's mother (as he assumes you're attacking his mother).
hauntedcomputer wrote:Jokic is just a stranger dribbling a basketball. The humility bit could well be a carefully crafted business model for all we know. It's actually getting as tiresome as egotistical bloviating at this point. "Look at me, look how humble I am!!"
DwayneSchintzus wrote:all the people in here defending this stuff really are doing the most hahaha.
I'm a hardcore Spurs fan and I'M saying he should have been cut. And I absolutely loved the kid until Friday.
D.Brasco wrote:DwayneSchintzus wrote:all the people in here defending this stuff really are doing the most hahaha.
I'm a hardcore Spurs fan and I'M saying he should have been cut. And I absolutely loved the kid until Friday.
People are like "dude was horny" we've all been horny, I've never flashed my penis at an unsuspecting women. Some of these people man...

otterpop_ wrote:lol why would you ask him to write more stuff?Dirk wrote:Xatticus wrote:Or perhaps those that disagree with you aren't the ones displaying an ignorant worldview?
We all have mothers. If your mother was the pillar of virtue that you believe she is, you wouldn't be here to type your messages on an internet forum. Mothers aren't as naive as you think they are. They just pretend to be in front of their children. It's actually quite instrumental in the propagation of the species, ya know?
It's never a good thing when rational gives way to political. Border patrolling is a self-serving endeavor, don't think for a moment that others don't know this.
Personally, I find this collective reaction to be a far greater threat to society than one man's deviances. It is the mechanism by which a 19-year-old stumbling in an elevator turns into a massacre.
But if you are so bothered... you can all get together and form a committee. You can call it the Committee of Public Safety.
Please re-read your post and clarify the statement about the user's mother (as he assumes you're attacking his mother).

DwayneSchintzus wrote:D.Brasco wrote:DwayneSchintzus wrote:all the people in here defending this stuff really are doing the most hahaha.
I'm a hardcore Spurs fan and I'M saying he should have been cut. And I absolutely loved the kid until Friday.
People are like "dude was horny" we've all been horny, I've never flashed my penis at an unsuspecting women. Some of these people man...
Not to mention flashing at a PSYCHOLOGIST. We’ve all (most) done SOME kind of dirty deed but i feel like this is a dif level lol
Xatticus wrote:DwayneSchintzus wrote:Lunartic wrote:He should get waived and slapped around by a husband or two but c'mon guys
Seeing genitalia is traumatic? Is he creating even more flashers by flashing innocent people? You know people watch porn, have sexual intercourse, attend things like Mardi Gras, the beach, nude beaches, etc, who exactly is traumatized because some skinny little teenager takes out his dick?
Context matters and when/where/how all play a role so if he cornered them or did anything else to exacerbate the situation (underage, threats, etc) that definitely will change my evidence-less assessment. As of now, if a female exposed her breasts to you while you waiting to fill up your car at Citgo, would you report it? Why? Why not? How would you rate your trauma?
But yeah, he should be waived because that's still criminal and very unprofessional. I'd deport him.
He’s like 6’6”, 215. If youre caught alone in a hotel room you are prob worried you are about to be raped.
These people were at work- not mardi gras. of course i wouldnt mind some woman flashing me. This is not the same thing.
Not everything is a “just rub some dirt on it” situation ffs.
I get the apples to oranges thing you are pointing out, but it's important to note that we charge people with what they actually do as opposed to another's fears of what they might do. If the latter were the case, there really wouldn't be many people free from incarceration.
bradybunch wrote:Money grab by the former SA employee.
It's highly inappropriate to flash anyone, but certainly not worthy of a big payout.
Ridiculous lawsuit incoming.
DwayneSchintzus wrote:all the people in here defending this stuff really are doing the most hahaha.
I'm a hardcore Spurs fan and I'M saying he should have been cut. And I absolutely loved the kid until Friday.
-Profanity- wrote:Lunartic wrote:
I didn't say that I knew the circumstances; I tried to explain to you why it's bad to expose your genitals to women,
Dirk wrote:Xatticus wrote:Or perhaps those that disagree with you aren't the ones displaying an ignorant worldview?
We all have mothers. If your mother was the pillar of virtue that you believe she is, you wouldn't be here to type your messages on an internet forum. Mothers aren't as naive as you think they are. They just pretend to be in front of their children. It's actually quite instrumental in the propagation of the species, ya know?
It's never a good thing when rational gives way to political. Border patrolling is a self-serving endeavor, don't think for a moment that others don't know this.
Personally, I find this collective reaction to be a far greater threat to society than one man's deviances. It is the mechanism by which a 19-year-old stumbling in an elevator turns into a massacre.
But if you are so bothered... you can all get together and form a committee. You can call it the Committee of Public Safety.
Please re-read your post and clarify the statement about the user's mother (as he assumes you're attacking his mother).
And then this part that is confusing:It's never a good thing when rational gives way to political. Border patrolling is a self-serving endeavor, don't think for a moment that others don't know this.
Personally, I find this collective reaction to be a far greater threat to society than one man's deviances. It is the mechanism by which a 19-year-old stumbling in an elevator turns into a massacre.
Ayt wrote:Xatticus wrote:DwayneSchintzus wrote:
He’s like 6’6”, 215. If youre caught alone in a hotel room you are prob worried you are about to be raped.
These people were at work- not mardi gras. of course i wouldnt mind some woman flashing me. This is not the same thing.
Not everything is a “just rub some dirt on it” situation ffs.
I get the apples to oranges thing you are pointing out, but it's important to note that we charge people with what they actually do as opposed to another's fears of what they might do. If the latter were the case, there really wouldn't be many people free from incarceration.
You are improperly reframing the issue. We do charge based on the level of threat. The threat from a large professional athlete exposing himself to a woman in a room is different from a woman flashing her tits from her car at a Citgo (the example brought up).