Around the League - Curry Out "A few weeks"

Post #1241 » by **MickeyDavis** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 3:27 am

Celtics losing has Daver sad. :wink:

Depleted Heat taking Minny to the wire with a minute to go.

Plossum · Post #1242 » by **Plossum** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 3:36 am

31mins from Gobert and didn’t get up 1 shot.

greekbuck34 · Post #1243 » by **greekbuck34** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 3:37 am

Plossum wrote:31mins from Gobert and didn’t get up 1 shot.

But he made 4/4 clutch FTs though.

Plossum · Post #1244 » by **Plossum** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 3:41 am

greekbuck34 wrote:
Plossum wrote:31mins from Gobert and didn’t get up 1 shot.

But he made 4/4 clutch FTs though.

113.64 TS% :lol:

rilamann · Post #1245 » by **rilamann** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 3:43 am

Apparently it seems the Bulls might be that one team that has the Celtic's number. Hopefully they can match up in the #2 vs #7 match up in the playoffs and maybe we can find out for sure....lol.

Post #1246 » by **MickeyDavis** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 1:25 pm

The most interesting game tonight is Simmons return to Philly (TNT). He will undoubtedly receive a warm reception.

I'm no Simmons fan but I hope he sticks it to Philly.

chonestown · Post #1247 » by **chonestown** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 3:04 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:The most interesting game tonight is Simmons return to Philly (TNT). He will undoubtedly receive a warm reception.

I'm no Simmons fan but I hope he sticks it to Philly.

Philly is depleted. I hope Earl Cureton gets some tick and makes Ben look like he just got done watching the end of "Beaches."

WeekapaugGroove · Post #1248 » by **WeekapaugGroove** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 4:06 pm

Breaking news, guy with a contract they can't give away is available lol

Read on Twitter

?t=wSBkOPcT4Mb6xRdU1sVo3w&s=19

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app

Daver · Post #1249 » by **Daver** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 5:22 pm

Plossum wrote:Mildly interesting the Bulls are now 2-1 v the Celts this year (lost game was only by 4 points). There’s something about the Bulls the Cs seem to struggle with.

Celts have lost to only 2 teams bulls 2xs n the Cavs 2xs

skones · Post #1250 » by **skones** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 7:30 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:Breaking news, guy with a contract they can't give away is available lol

I think it's more important to look at Robinson, what he provides, and then ask why Miami no longer sees him as a valuable contributor. While he's paid double, I think many of the answers to those questions directly apply to Grayson Allen. That's why I feel we should move him for a possible playoff contributor while we can.

stellation · Post #1251 » by **stellation** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 8:05 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:The most interesting game tonight is Simmons return to Philly (TNT). He will undoubtedly receive a warm reception.

I'm no Simmons fan but I hope he sticks it to Philly.

I hope he grabs a marker and writes a cheeky message like "Chopped cheese > cheesesteak" on his sneakers.

AussieBuck · Post #1252 » by **AussieBuck** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 9:13 pm

imma tune in for some of the that can't lose game between philly and the nets.

Daver · Post #1253 » by **Daver** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 9:22 pm

skones wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:Breaking news, guy with a contract they can't give away is available lol

I think it's more important to look at Robinson, what he provides, and then ask why Miami no longer sees him as a valuable contributor. While he's paid double, I think many of the answers to those questions directly apply to Grayson Allen. That's why I feel we should move him for a possible playoff contributor while we can.

Isn't Allen considered a better defender than Robinson.As much as I love the way Robinson shoots

Post #1254 » by **MickeyDavis** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 9:48 pm

Robinson only played 15 games his rookie year. His second year he shot well. And he's shot worse in each subsequent year.

skones · Post #1255 » by **skones** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:18 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:Robinson only played 15 games his rookie year. His second year he shot well. And he's shot worse in each subsequent year.

I don't think people are looking at Duncan Robinson and thinking he's anything but an elite shooter. It's everything else.

DrWood · Post #1256 » by **DrWood** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:33 pm

skones wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:Breaking news, guy with a contract they can't give away is available lol

I think it's more important to look at Robinson, what he provides, and then ask why Miami no longer sees him as a valuable contributor. While he's paid double, I think many of the answers to those questions directly apply to Grayson Allen. That's why I feel we should move him for a possible playoff contributor while we can.

They are not the same player.

skones · Post #1257 » by **skones** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:38 pm

DrWood wrote:
skones wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:Breaking news, guy with a contract they can't give away is available lol

I think it's more important to look at Robinson, what he provides, and then ask why Miami no longer sees him as a valuable contributor. While he's paid double, I think many of the answers to those questions directly apply to Grayson Allen. That's why I feel we should move him for a possible playoff contributor while we can.

They are not the same player.

Could you show me where I said they were?

DrWood · Post #1258 » by **DrWood** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:41 pm

skones wrote:
DrWood wrote:
skones wrote:
I think it's more important to look at Robinson, what he provides, and then ask why Miami no longer sees him as a valuable contributor. While he's paid double, I think many of the answers to those questions directly apply to Grayson Allen. That's why I feel we should move him for a possible playoff contributor while we can.

They are not the same player.

Could you show me where I said they were?

see part I bolded.

skones · Post #1259 » by **skones** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:47 pm

DrWood wrote:
skones wrote:
DrWood wrote:They are not the same player.

Could you show me where I said they were?

see part I bolded.

Again, could you show me where I said they were? The bolded part does not answer that question nor does it infer that I think they are. It only means they have similarities, which they certainly do when it comes to their overall lack of versatility.

DrWood · Post #1260 » by **DrWood** » Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:55 pm

skones wrote:
DrWood wrote:
skones wrote:
Could you show me where I said they were?

see part I bolded.

Again, could you show me where I said they were? The bolded part does not answer that question nor does it infer that I think they are. It only means they have similarities, which they certainly do when it comes to their overall lack of versatility.

when you and someone else have had a failure to communicate, you have to admit you're part of the problem.
Take care.