If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
basketballRob
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,561
- And1: 14,990
- Joined: May 05, 2014
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/franz-wagner-stats-last-21-games
Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
Magic_Johnny12
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,508
- And1: 10,088
- Joined: Sep 27, 2013
- Contact:
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
I’m going to try my best to let bias aside.
1A - Evan Mobley (dependent on team picking/needs)
1B - Franz Wagner (dependent on team picking/needs)
2 - Cade Cunningham
3 - Jalen Green
4 - Jalen Suggs
5A - Scottie Barnes (dependent on team picking/needs)
5B - Josh Giddey (dependent on team picking/needs)
1A - Evan Mobley (dependent on team picking/needs)
1B - Franz Wagner (dependent on team picking/needs)
2 - Cade Cunningham
3 - Jalen Green
4 - Jalen Suggs
5A - Scottie Barnes (dependent on team picking/needs)
5B - Josh Giddey (dependent on team picking/needs)
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
- VFX
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,650
- And1: 16,426
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
This thread got interesting.
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
OrlMagic05
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,920
- And1: 1,108
- Joined: Aug 01, 2014
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:I’m going to try my best to let bias aside.
1A - Evan Mobley (dependent on team picking/needs)
1B - Franz Wagner (dependent on team picking/needs)
2 - Cade Cunningham
3 - Jalen Green
4 - Jalen Suggs
5A - Scottie Barnes (dependent on team picking/needs)
5B - Josh Giddey (dependent on team picking/needs)
Suggs hasn't shown enough to be ahead of Giddy and Barnes.
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
- ocelot17
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,600
- And1: 4,057
- Joined: Feb 28, 2010
- Location: Houston, Tx
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
?s=46&t=_1W5u3snbCQb_atRKTGyCQ
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
HotelVitale
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,889
- And1: 12,014
- Joined: Sep 14, 2007
- Location: West Philly, PA
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
CptCrunch wrote:A thread like this just reveals the stephews on this forum. Anyone placing Barnes or Cade high probably reads more ESPN than watch basketball , and probably has never played basketball at any level.
Anyone who plays basketball and watches Cade Cunningham and doesn't think he's a really impressive talent is probably lying about one of those two things. No way to miss how good he is at controlling the game and space. That's an extremely rare and hard thing to do and people who play ball should understand that better than even big fans/watchers.
He might not end up a great player because of inefficient shooting, but your comment doesn't have the air of 'Cade's awesome but he needs to hit more jumpers or he can't be great.' It has the air of 'Cade's an overrated phony' and I'm kinda calling BS on that.
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
jasonxxx102
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,533
- And1: 3,674
- Joined: Feb 13, 2014
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
Green a career 42% from the field "BUT HE SCORED 30 A FEW TIMES!!!!!!!!!!!!"
It's like clockwork every 10th game when he gets hot from the field people post a bunch about him and then disappear for the next 10 games
It's like clockwork every 10th game when he gets hot from the field people post a bunch about him and then disappear for the next 10 games
76ciology wrote:Wouldn't Edey have a better chance of winning the scoring battle against Tatum in the post after a switch than Tatum shooting over Edey's 9'6" standing reach?
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
- K_chile22
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,746
- And1: 8,631
- Joined: Jul 15, 2015
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
jasonxxx102 wrote:Green a career 42% from the field "BUT HE SCORED 30 A FEW TIMES!!!!!!!!!!!!"
It's like clockwork every 10th game when he gets hot from the field people post a bunch about him and then disappear for the next 10 games
He takes a ton of 3s which drags down his FG% because FG% is bad, his TS% hasn't been great but it's pretty solid compared to others his age that have any kind of high usage role. Franz is an outlier with his efficiency at his age. Among the top 10 guys who have any kind of significant usage only Mobley and Franz have been more efficient and mobley gets to play alot as a play finisher since he's a big so his TS should be higher than Green's
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
Magic_Johnny12
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,508
- And1: 10,088
- Joined: Sep 27, 2013
- Contact:
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
OrlMagic05
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,920
- And1: 1,108
- Joined: Aug 01, 2014
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
ocelot17 wrote:?s=46&t=_1W5u3snbCQb_atRKTGyCQ
His usage rate is also the highest at 28%, Shot attempts the highest at 18FGA, shoots 42%FG all to only average 1.8 more PPG.
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
- Duffman100
- Forum Mod - Raptors

- Posts: 48,166
- And1: 72,774
- Joined: Jun 27, 2002
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
Wagner is looking sick. Love that kid.
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
- K_chile22
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,746
- And1: 8,631
- Joined: Jul 15, 2015
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
And yet Franz is the only guy mentioned here that's more efficient than him despite having really high usage. Obviously Franz has been better this year, his efficiency at his usage and age is insanely impressive, but Green has been impressive in his own right.OrlMagic05 wrote:ocelot17 wrote:?s=46&t=_1W5u3snbCQb_atRKTGyCQ
His usage rate is also the highest at 28%, Shot attempts the highest at 18FGA, shoots 42%FG all to only average only 1.8 more PPG.
People forget that it's harder to be efficient the higher your usage is. Idk why Green is the only one getting hammered for his efficiency so much when Barnes, Cade and Giddey are much worse in that regard, 2/3 on lower usage which generally means less responsibility. Green's efficiency is totally fine given the context as a high usage skinny 20 year old super athletic scoring guard on a bad team with no PG. If he's still at 54% TS in two or three years then yeah that's a problem
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
jasonxxx102
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,533
- And1: 3,674
- Joined: Feb 13, 2014
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:ocelot17 wrote:?s=46&t=_1W5u3snbCQb_atRKTGyCQ
Now show his efficiency stats.
Nah, raw box is way sexier. Who cares that he put up 25 shots to get that 30
76ciology wrote:Wouldn't Edey have a better chance of winning the scoring battle against Tatum in the post after a switch than Tatum shooting over Edey's 9'6" standing reach?
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
jasonxxx102
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,533
- And1: 3,674
- Joined: Feb 13, 2014
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
K_chile22 wrote:And yet Franz is the only guy mentioned here that's more efficient than him despite having really high usage. Obviously Franz has been better this year, his efficiency at his usage and age is insanely impressive, but Green has been impressive in his own right.OrlMagic05 wrote:ocelot17 wrote:?s=46&t=_1W5u3snbCQb_atRKTGyCQ
His usage rate is also the highest at 28%, Shot attempts the highest at 18FGA, shoots 42%FG all to only average only 1.8 more PPG.
People forget that it's harder to be efficient the higher your usage is. Idk why Green is the only one getting hammered for his efficiency so much when Barnes, Cade and Giddey are much worse in that regard, 2/3 on lower usage which generally means less responsibility. Green's efficiency is totally fine given the context as a high usage skinny 20 year old super athletic scoring guard on a bad team with no PG. If he's still at 54% TS in two or three years then yeah that's a problem
because they do other things, Scottie can defend and playmake, Cade is a great playmaker and shot creator, same with Giddey.
Green does absolutely nothing but score and is one of the worst defensive players in the league
76ciology wrote:Wouldn't Edey have a better chance of winning the scoring battle against Tatum in the post after a switch than Tatum shooting over Edey's 9'6" standing reach?
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
- K_chile22
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,746
- And1: 8,631
- Joined: Jul 15, 2015
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
Green has the same assist rate and tov rate as Franz, right behind Barnes in assist rate but has a better Tov rate, and Barnes is not a good defender right now either despite college rep.jasonxxx102 wrote:K_chile22 wrote:And yet Franz is the only guy mentioned here that's more efficient than him despite having really high usage. Obviously Franz has been better this year, his efficiency at his usage and age is insanely impressive, but Green has been impressive in his own right.OrlMagic05 wrote:
His usage rate is also the highest at 28%, Shot attempts the highest at 18FGA, shoots 42%FG all to only average only 1.8 more PPG.
People forget that it's harder to be efficient the higher your usage is. Idk why Green is the only one getting hammered for his efficiency so much when Barnes, Cade and Giddey are much worse in that regard, 2/3 on lower usage which generally means less responsibility. Green's efficiency is totally fine given the context as a high usage skinny 20 year old super athletic scoring guard on a bad team with no PG. If he's still at 54% TS in two or three years then yeah that's a problem
because they do other things, Scottie can defend and playmake, Cade is a great playmaker and shot creator, same with Giddey.
Green does absolutely nothing but score and is one of the worst defensive players in the league
Giddey can only play make and do nothing else rn which is problematic in itself
Green's taken a bit of a playmaking leap this year
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
threethehardway
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,431
- And1: 2,171
- Joined: May 31, 2021
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
Cade Cunningham shouldn't have been the number 1 pick unless you think he can become one of the best shooters in the world.
His floor game and size was overrated from the beginning.
His inability to put pressure on the rim and lack of scoring aggression means he can't be effective as a tip of the spear primary ball handler.
He would be better off playing next to a tip of the spear primary ball handler and learning how to come off screens, handoffs and etc as a movement shooter.
If I was coaching Cade, he would have to watch a lot of Ray Allen and Reggie Miller and he wouldn't be allowed to handle the ball as much as he does.
I also would have him watch a lot DeMar DeRozan and middle career Kobe so he can learn how to get his shot off.
His shooting percentages are crap because he's taking a lot of tough 3 pointers and having to drive to the rim from the 3 point line.
He's playing out of position because he's been the best ball handler on every team he's been on and coaches don't care about his development and stick him at PG.
Detroit isn't winning crap anyway and if Casey cared about him, he would play off ball as much as possible, doing traditional SG things.
Only way Cade can become a winning player is learning how to play SG.
His floor game and size was overrated from the beginning.
His inability to put pressure on the rim and lack of scoring aggression means he can't be effective as a tip of the spear primary ball handler.
He would be better off playing next to a tip of the spear primary ball handler and learning how to come off screens, handoffs and etc as a movement shooter.
If I was coaching Cade, he would have to watch a lot of Ray Allen and Reggie Miller and he wouldn't be allowed to handle the ball as much as he does.
I also would have him watch a lot DeMar DeRozan and middle career Kobe so he can learn how to get his shot off.
His shooting percentages are crap because he's taking a lot of tough 3 pointers and having to drive to the rim from the 3 point line.
He's playing out of position because he's been the best ball handler on every team he's been on and coaches don't care about his development and stick him at PG.
Detroit isn't winning crap anyway and if Casey cared about him, he would play off ball as much as possible, doing traditional SG things.
Only way Cade can become a winning player is learning how to play SG.
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
QingJames
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,877
- And1: 2,450
- Joined: Apr 13, 2021
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
K_chile22 wrote:Green has the same assist rate and tov rate as Franz, right behind Barnes in assist rate but has a better Tov rate, and Barnes is not a good defender right now either despite college rep.jasonxxx102 wrote:K_chile22 wrote:And yet Franz is the only guy mentioned here that's more efficient than him despite having really high usage. Obviously Franz has been better this year, his efficiency at his usage and age is insanely impressive, but Green has been impressive in his own right.
People forget that it's harder to be efficient the higher your usage is. Idk why Green is the only one getting hammered for his efficiency so much when Barnes, Cade and Giddey are much worse in that regard, 2/3 on lower usage which generally means less responsibility. Green's efficiency is totally fine given the context as a high usage skinny 20 year old super athletic scoring guard on a bad team with no PG. If he's still at 54% TS in two or three years then yeah that's a problem
because they do other things, Scottie can defend and playmake, Cade is a great playmaker and shot creator, same with Giddey.
Green does absolutely nothing but score and is one of the worst defensive players in the league
Giddey can only play make and do nothing else rn which is problematic in itself
Green's taken a bit of a playmaking leap this year
Barnes' defense hasn't been good this year for sure, but he looks like prime Kawhi Leonard out there compared to Green's defense.
eyeatoma wrote:You guys still dont' get it. Playoff accomplishment don't matter when you're up for your 1st MVP. When you're up for your 3rd in a row, damn straight it matters, as the only ones who done it are top 15 players of all time who have won rings.
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
- Son Goku 25
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,121
- And1: 41,207
- Joined: Jan 18, 2010
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
Way too early to decide
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
OrlMagic05
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,920
- And1: 1,108
- Joined: Aug 01, 2014
-
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
Son Goku 25 wrote:Way too early to decide
Not too early to have Franz in this convo as 1a/1b.
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
-
Farhan0311
- Sophomore
- Posts: 119
- And1: 49
- Joined: Jan 02, 2020
Re: If you could re do the Cade, Green and Mobley draft would you go differently
QingJames wrote:K_chile22 wrote:Green has the same assist rate and tov rate as Franz, right behind Barnes in assist rate but has a better Tov rate, and Barnes is not a good defender right now either despite college rep.jasonxxx102 wrote:
because they do other things, Scottie can defend and playmake, Cade is a great playmaker and shot creator, same with Giddey.
Green does absolutely nothing but score and is one of the worst defensive players in the league
Giddey can only play make and do nothing else rn which is problematic in itself
Green's taken a bit of a playmaking leap this year
Barnes' defense hasn't been good this year for sure, but he looks like prime Kawhi Leonard out there compared to Green's defense.
Not really.
And honestly they are good and bad for the exact opposite reasons. Green can keep guards in front him consistently on one on one defense at the perimeter. He horrible when he gets switched onto a big. Barnes has strength to handle bigs in paint. Guards blow by him easily though.




