E-Balla wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:E-Balla wrote:Hey Melo this is starting to make sense the further the conversation goes you might wanna drop it lol.
POWER RANKINGS as of 1/27
1. San Antonio Spurs (43-5) 0
2. Oklahoma City Thunder (39-11) +1
3. Charlotte Hornets (38-11) -1
4. Indiana Pacers (34-15) 0
5. Denver Nuggets (33-16) 0
6. Portland Trailblazers (31-19) +1
7. Dallas Mavericks (33-16) -1
8. Los Angeles Clippers (32-18) +2
9. Golden State Warriors (31-19) -1
10. Cleveland Cavaliers (30-20) -1
If you still ain't learn those star ratings aren't a measure of who's a better player you'll keep underachieving. The sim might play higher star ratings over better fits, but we're supposed to be smarter than that. I'm #2 in the league with multiple 3.5 stars leading my squad. Hypothetically someone benched Kyrie and KAT for CP3 and Allen you'd call it a tank but they'd win more games.
You not following the convo. What you're doing is intentional to win. Like how you studied Wiseman and other dudes for Moses Brown and Allen. This man just said he did not expect to win and he was suprised he had a hot start. And then benching Porter for Pat Williams after he started hot as a panic move to tank is too sus. You wasn't even here for this.![]()
I got two finals appearances, one chip, one bubble chip. If that's considered an underchiever then i'll gladly accept that
I'm following. You're claiming he tanked by sitting players that weren't good fits for his roster. If you only claimed he built his team to tank and got lucky I'm sure he'd agree there.
If you only claimed he built his team to tank and got lucky I'm sure he'd agree there.
It's the same concept. A tank is a tank.




































