[SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, BullyKing, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
[SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
- Domejandro
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 20,567
- And1: 31,031
- Joined: Jul 29, 2014
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
Godaddycurse
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,538
- And1: 14,436
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
Great deadline for lakers
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
R-DAWG
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,973
- And1: 6,027
- Joined: Nov 07, 2003
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
The Lakers traded Pat Bev for a song that came out in 2018
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
LightTheBeam
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,105
- And1: 12,157
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
So they traded
Bryant + Bev for Bamba + 3 denver 2nds
I really don't understand that. Bev was a solid defender. Bryant for Bamba is a wash
Bryant + Bev for Bamba + 3 denver 2nds
I really don't understand that. Bev was a solid defender. Bryant for Bamba is a wash
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
BBallFreak
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 57,529
- And1: 18,776
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
I like this for the Lakers. Can't see Beverly playing on Orlando, though.
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
Colbinii
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,859
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
Beverley, come home to Minnesota...or he goes to LAC? Probably just LAC at this point.
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 59,574
- And1: 36,524
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
There has to be more or something is low key going on with Bamba.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
GatorbaitDD
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,091
- And1: 675
- Joined: Aug 03, 2012
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
BBallFreak wrote:I like this for the Lakers. Can't see Beverly playing on Orlando, though.
Likely buy out
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
moss_is_1
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,971
- And1: 2,385
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
Colbinii wrote:Beverley, come home to Minnesota...or he goes to LAC? Probably just LAC at this point.
I'd like him on the Wolves, but I just don't see it now that Conley is here and Jmac is healthy.
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
GatorbaitDD
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,091
- And1: 675
- Joined: Aug 03, 2012
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
jbk1234 wrote:There has to be more or something is low key going on with Bamba.
He is terrible
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,058
- And1: 16,459
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
Colbinii wrote:Beverley, come home to Minnesota...or he goes to LAC? Probably just LAC at this point.
Suns?
It's going to be a glorious day... I feel my luck could change
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
jayjaysee
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 21,302
- And1: 8,127
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
I like having Bamba and the ability to keep Bamba more than having Bryant.
I don’t like just throwing away Bev/DAR lineups. I would’ve used Walker and either Jones or Gabriel..
I don’t like just throwing away Bev/DAR lineups. I would’ve used Walker and either Jones or Gabriel..
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons

- Posts: 51,646
- And1: 18,478
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
Oh look. Another easily attainable big man I like better than Wiseman.
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
ejftw
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,609
- And1: 5,664
- Joined: Nov 30, 2008
- Contact:
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
Dr Positivity wrote:Colbinii wrote:Beverley, come home to Minnesota...or he goes to LAC? Probably just LAC at this point.
Suns?
Him and CP?
Interesting
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 59,574
- And1: 36,524
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
GatorbaitDD wrote:jbk1234 wrote:There has to be more or something is low key going on with Bamba.
He is terrible
He's a big who can shoot 3s and get blocks. He's making around $10M and is expiring.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
wolves_89
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,167
- And1: 4,659
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
moss_is_1 wrote:Colbinii wrote:Beverley, come home to Minnesota...or he goes to LAC? Probably just LAC at this point.
I'd like him on the Wolves, but I just don't see it now that Conley is here and Jmac is healthy.
There is no way that McLaughlin should be a concern if the Wolves can get Beverley back.
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
orlando_joe
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,920
- And1: 1,919
- Joined: Dec 27, 2015
-
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
has to be more for magic ? why pay extra 3 mill to waive?
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
R-DAWG
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,973
- And1: 6,027
- Joined: Nov 07, 2003
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
The Lakers have done a really nice job with the limited assets they have. They got bigger, younger, more athletic and added 3 above average 3 point shooters (Beasley, Russell, Bamba). Including the Rui trade, they are out 1 protected 1st and net 2 2nds.
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
Colbinii
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,859
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
orlando_joe wrote:has to be more for magic ? why pay extra 3 mill to waive?
A 2nd or two.
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,666
- And1: 19,770
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: [SHAMS] Mo Bamba to the Lakers (Beverly)
wolves_89 wrote:moss_is_1 wrote:Colbinii wrote:Beverley, come home to Minnesota...or he goes to LAC? Probably just LAC at this point.
I'd like him on the Wolves, but I just don't see it now that Conley is here and Jmac is healthy.
There is no way that McLaughlin should be a concern if the Wolves can get Beverley back.
I think they’d move Nowell (more minutes for Pat, might not bring Nowell back) or NAW (similar game to Pat).
Return to Trades and Transactions

