ImageImage

Aaron Rodgers Traded to Jets - Rodgers/#15/#170 for #13/#42 & conditional 2024 second/first

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 18,176
And1: 6,391
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#261 » by Profound23 » Sat Mar 18, 2023 6:46 pm

Posting here because I don't want to hijack the other thread:

ReasonablySober wrote:
Profound23 wrote:If there is any truth of Lamar to the Pats (as a possibility) I trade Aaron to the Jets for a 2024 1st and I am good.

First off the 13th pick this year is probably equal to the 23rd pick next year. Second off, if Lamar goes to the Pats and Tua/Lamar/Josh Allen stay healthy.....the Jets could be the last place team in that division and we could be staring at a top 10 pick like Seattle did with Russell Wilson.


I'm with you. They also play the Chiefs, Chargers, Cowboys, Eagles, and Giants. There's some layups on their schedule too but that might be a six win team.



That is exactly what I am saying. Jets have some nice pieces and with Rodgers they could EASILY make the playoffs.....but two of the teams in their division also have nice pieces and good QBs. Tua has injury concerns, but IF he can stay healthy that team will be in the postseason. If Allen stays healthy they will be in the postseason. And IF the Ravens sign Lamar that is another potential playoff team.

A lot of IFs, but even if some of those things don't happen and the Jets make the playoffs and get pick 24 or something, next year's draft is better than this year so that could be an equal player and it's worth the gamble. Jets start off losing to Bills, Fins, KC and it becomes a snowball effect. In this situation, if Love stinks we might have two of the top picks in a stacked draft.
Carioca
Ballboy
Posts: 41
And1: 14
Joined: Jun 23, 2016

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#262 » by Carioca » Sat Mar 18, 2023 7:41 pm

Profound23 wrote:Posting here because I don't want to hijack the other thread:

ReasonablySober wrote:
Profound23 wrote:If there is any truth of Lamar to the Pats (as a possibility) I trade Aaron to the Jets for a 2024 1st and I am good.

First off the 13th pick this year is probably equal to the 23rd pick next year. Second off, if Lamar goes to the Pats and Tua/Lamar/Josh Allen stay healthy.....the Jets could be the last place team in that division and we could be staring at a top 10 pick like Seattle did with Russell Wilson.


I'm with you. They also play the Chiefs, Chargers, Cowboys, Eagles, and Giants. There's some layups on their schedule too but that might be a six win team.



That is exactly what I am saying. Jets have some nice pieces and with Rodgers they could EASILY make the playoffs.....but two of the teams in their division also have nice pieces and good QBs. Tua has injury concerns, but IF he can stay healthy that team will be in the postseason. If Allen stays healthy they will be in the postseason. And IF the Ravens sign Lamar that is another potential playoff team.

A lot of IFs, but even if some of those things don't happen and the Jets make the playoffs and get pick 24 or something, next year's draft is better than this year so that could be an equal player and it's worth the gamble. Jets start off losing to Bills, Fins, KC and it becomes a snowball effect. In this situation, if Love stinks we might have two of the top picks in a stacked draft.


Not to mention that the Jets trading for Rodgers could blow up spectacularly in their faces. I really think the endgame for all of this is at the extremes: either a Super Bowl or a crash and burn.

What was one of Hackett's main issues in Denver? Acquiescing to all of Russell Wilson's demands to run the offense he wanted rather than the offense as designed. Where have we heard that before? I think it's quite likely we see the same hero ball/end-McCarthy offense we saw last year and in 2017-2018 in NY.

That's really why I'd rather have the 2024 first unconditional from the Jets--it's probably a 20s pick, but I like taking a chance on the idea the Pack could win the lottery like Seattle did.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 92,280
And1: 44,904
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#263 » by MickeyDavis » Sat Mar 18, 2023 8:37 pm

Hackett didn't call plays in Green Bay, the offense was very good. He did call plays in Denver and had the bottom rated offense when he turned over play calling to Kubiak in week 10. Not apples to apples of course.

I don't really see how Rodgers to the Jets "blows up". They had Wilson, White and Flacco last year. If they were giving up a Russell package then sure, but they aren't. I guess if we somehow get a 2024 first and it ends up top 10 you could say it "blew up" for them. Who knows, maybe Wilson learning from Rodgers for a year two lights a fire. Doubtful but possible ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
skones
RealGM
Posts: 36,969
And1: 17,101
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: Milwaukee
       

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#264 » by skones » Sat Mar 18, 2023 9:04 pm

The Jets are a super bowl contender with Rodgers. Make them pay for it. They can give me a first or they can **** off.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 23,857
And1: 19,657
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#265 » by WeekapaugGroove » Sat Mar 18, 2023 9:05 pm

The AFC does seem tough on paper. The odds would be higher the Jets miss the playoffs with Rodgers than win the conference. So I can see why the Jets would be leery of giving up the farm. It's not like it's a slam dunk you're the favorite now move.

It's why to be a package built on conditional picks makes sense. Like a 2 this year, a pick in 24 based on team performance, and a pick in 25 based on if he's on the team in 24


Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
XtremeDunkz
General Manager
Posts: 8,308
And1: 6,760
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
       

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#266 » by XtremeDunkz » Sat Mar 18, 2023 10:10 pm

The Jets will be very good with rodgers. Thinking otherwise it's foolish.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.:lol: Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
Mtsportsfan
Rookie
Posts: 1,164
And1: 344
Joined: Oct 21, 2017
     

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#267 » by Mtsportsfan » Sat Mar 18, 2023 10:41 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:The AFC does seem tough on paper. The odds would be higher the Jets miss the playoffs with Rodgers than win the conference. So I can see why the Jets would be leery of giving up the farm. It's not like it's a slam dunk you're the favorite now move.

It's why to be a package built on conditional picks makes sense. Like a 2 this year, a pick in 24 based on team performance, and a pick in 25 based on if he's on the team in 24


Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


That's the roll of the dice here , they know the qbs they have won't cut it , after the season ended the clearly targeted Rodgers because they think that with him they title contenders , so why would we want conditional picks ? They want him come get him ! I don't care if he plays next year , not our problem ! I want this years 1st and 4th and next years 2nd !
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 23,857
And1: 19,657
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#268 » by WeekapaugGroove » Sat Mar 18, 2023 11:30 pm

Mtsportsfan wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:The AFC does seem tough on paper. The odds would be higher the Jets miss the playoffs with Rodgers than win the conference. So I can see why the Jets would be leery of giving up the farm. It's not like it's a slam dunk you're the favorite now move.

It's why to be a package built on conditional picks makes sense. Like a 2 this year, a pick in 24 based on team performance, and a pick in 25 based on if he's on the team in 24


Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


That's the roll of the dice here , they know the qbs they have won't cut it , after the season ended the clearly targeted Rodgers because they think that with him they title contenders , so why would we want conditional picks ? They want him come get him ! I don't care if he plays next year , not our problem ! I want this years 1st and 4th and next years 2nd !
Why stop there, let's get 4 1sts? Seems reasonable since the jets have to make the trade.

What I was saying is it's good to understand the risk/reward/uncertainty for the Jets. Rodgers is definitely worth more to NY if he plays more than one year. If either side was willing to do whatever the deal would already be done. Conditional picks seems like a reasonable way for the Packers to get value and the Jets to mitigate risk and for everyone to get a trade done that they want to happen. Win/win

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
LatentFrog
Senior
Posts: 566
And1: 387
Joined: Mar 17, 2019
       

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#269 » by LatentFrog » Sun Mar 19, 2023 2:14 am

Listen, the Jets have been getting high firsts for decades. They've always been talking about the future. This gives them, the fans, and the NY media the opportunity to have at least one year of playing for something now. That's worth #13. I think there is serious egg on the face of both teams if they don't get it done. Both teams know that, so right now they're each waiting for the other team to cave. It's a game of chicken and we hopefully will win.
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 29,101
And1: 20,220
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#270 » by Matches Malone » Sun Mar 19, 2023 3:03 am

If Gute can pull #13 off, I'd drive up there myself and get down on my knees. I think they land on a package kinda like this:

2023 2nd rounder
2024 Conditional 3rd that becomes a 2nd if Jets make playoffs, 1st if they make or win Super Bowl
Corey Davis or Elijah Moore (preferably Moore, obviously)
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,660
And1: 3,011
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#271 » by MVP2110 » Sun Mar 19, 2023 3:08 am

Matches Malone wrote:If Gute can pull #13 off, I'd drive up there myself and get down on my knees. I think they land on a package kinda like this:

2023 2nd rounder
2024 Conditional 3rd that becomes a 2nd if Jets make playoffs, 1st if they make or win Super Bowl
Corey Davis or Elijah Moore (preferably Moore, obviously)


This is basically exactly what I am expecting and I'd be happy with that package
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
th87
General Manager
Posts: 9,823
And1: 9,414
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#272 » by th87 » Sun Mar 19, 2023 5:02 am

RRyder823 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:EXACTLY the SAME thing happening EXACTLY the SAME way is not the same as 'similar' and 'comparable'...I'm shocked by how anyone would disagree with this situations being 'similar'. For reference Websters dictionary

1
: having characteristics in common : strictly comparable
2
: alike in substance or essentials : CORRESPONDING
Because if it isnt a 1 for 1 retelling it's totally not similar. And The Force Awakens isn't similar to A New Hope

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Do either of you think anyone disputes that level of similarity?

Of course they're similar on a "Packers drafted a replacement early and groomed him for three years before trading the incumbent to the Jets" level.

That is not the argument at all. That's what you're strawmanning.

The argument is about you guys using those high-level similarities as evidence that the current decisions were smart/sound because it worked out last time.

And there are enough differences between the two scenarios that make drafting a replacement in 2020 (in the middle of a SB window) a dumb decision, where in 2005 it was smart one.

Strawmanning this position as "derp they're saying no similarities hur hur" is General Board sh*t.
User avatar
th87
General Manager
Posts: 9,823
And1: 9,414
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#273 » by th87 » Sun Mar 19, 2023 5:28 am

Lippo wrote:
rilamann wrote:
th87 wrote:
Murphy hasn't earned that right. The success for decades is almost 100% predicated on one grand slam decision in 1992 and another in 2005. Neither made by him.

Everything else has been average work at best.


I don't think people realize how hard it is to only win 2 Super Bowls in 31 seasons with a first ballot hall of famer at QB.

:D


Colts Manning + Brees Saints


Haha I find this argument so annoying when its serious...like "eh SBs are hard, what can ya do?" Over and over we've been on the doorstep and fell short, and management did exactly nothing to address the weaknesses that caused it.

And regarding these QBs, gotta go deeper.

Manning had to face Brady a handful of times. Rodgers faced Colin Kaepernick and Jimmy G.

And why doesn't his time with Denver count? That's still 2 wins, 4 total appearances.

Brees is kind of similar, but Rodgers is significantly better as a QB. And the refs egregiously cost Brees a surefire SB appearance.

The only comparable talent to Rodgers is Mahomes, and he already has 2 wins in 3 appearances in like 5(?) years in the league.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 22,838
And1: 9,356
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#274 » by M-C-G » Sun Mar 19, 2023 5:53 am

th87 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:EXACTLY the SAME thing happening EXACTLY the SAME way is not the same as 'similar' and 'comparable'...I'm shocked by how anyone would disagree with this situations being 'similar'. For reference Websters dictionary

Because if it isnt a 1 for 1 retelling it's totally not similar. And The Force Awakens isn't similar to A New Hope

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Do either of you think anyone disputes that level of similarity?

Of course they're similar on a "Packers drafted a replacement early and groomed him for three years before trading the incumbent to the Jets" level.

That is not the argument at all. That's what you're strawmanning.

The argument is about you guys using those high-level similarities as evidence that the current decisions were smart/sound because it worked out last time.

And there are enough differences between the two scenarios that make drafting a replacement in 2020 (in the middle of a SB window) a dumb decision, where in 2005 it was smart one.

Strawmanning this position as "derp they're saying no similarities hur hur" is General Board sh*t.

I don’t think you will go back through the threads around here but yes, people have mocked people saying it is similar. That’s a fact


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
User avatar
th87
General Manager
Posts: 9,823
And1: 9,414
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#275 » by th87 » Sun Mar 19, 2023 6:24 am

M-C-G wrote:
th87 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:Because if it isnt a 1 for 1 retelling it's totally not similar. And The Force Awakens isn't similar to A New Hope

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Do either of you think anyone disputes that level of similarity?

Of course they're similar on a "Packers drafted a replacement early and groomed him for three years before trading the incumbent to the Jets" level.

That is not the argument at all. That's what you're strawmanning.

The argument is about you guys using those high-level similarities as evidence that the current decisions were smart/sound because it worked out last time.

And there are enough differences between the two scenarios that make drafting a replacement in 2020 (in the middle of a SB window) a dumb decision, where in 2005 it was smart one.

Strawmanning this position as "derp they're saying no similarities hur hur" is General Board sh*t.

I don’t think you will go back through the threads around here but yes, people have mocked people saying it is similar. That’s a fact


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


If so, that's insane. Obviously there are similarities at a high level.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,106
And1: 4,149
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#276 » by RRyder823 » Sun Mar 19, 2023 7:02 am

th87 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:EXACTLY the SAME thing happening EXACTLY the SAME way is not the same as 'similar' and 'comparable'...I'm shocked by how anyone would disagree with this situations being 'similar'. For reference Websters dictionary

Because if it isnt a 1 for 1 retelling it's totally not similar. And The Force Awakens isn't similar to A New Hope

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Do either of you think anyone disputes that level of similarity?


Of course they're similar on a "Packers drafted a replacement early and groomed him for three years before trading the incumbent to the Jets" level.

That is not the argument at all. That's what you're strawmanning.

The argument is about you guys using those high-level similarities as evidence that the current decisions were smart/sound because it worked out last time.

And there are enough differences between the two scenarios that make drafting a replacement in 2020 (in the middle of a SB window) a dumb decision, where in 2005 it was smart one.

Strawmanning this position as "derp they're saying no similarities hur hur" is General Board sh*t.


There's litterally posts stating "the two situations aren't similar at all" sooooooooo yes

Whether it's a smart decision or not is tied to whether Love becomes a Pro Bowl level player and is the QB the next 10+ years or if he isnt. Gutes job is 100% tied to that question


Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
Mtsportsfan
Rookie
Posts: 1,164
And1: 344
Joined: Oct 21, 2017
     

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#277 » by Mtsportsfan » Sun Mar 19, 2023 2:00 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Mtsportsfan wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:The AFC does seem tough on paper. The odds would be higher the Jets miss the playoffs with Rodgers than win the conference. So I can see why the Jets would be leery of giving up the farm. It's not like it's a slam dunk you're the favorite now move.

It's why to be a package built on conditional picks makes sense. Like a 2 this year, a pick in 24 based on team performance, and a pick in 25 based on if he's on the team in 24


Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


That's the roll of the dice here , they know the qbs they have won't cut it , after the season ended the clearly targeted Rodgers because they think that with him they title contenders , so why would we want conditional picks ? They want him come get him ! I don't care if he plays next year , not our problem ! I want this years 1st and 4th and next years 2nd !
Why stop there, let's get 4 1sts? Seems reasonable since the jets have to make the trade.

What I was saying is it's good to understand the risk/reward/uncertainty for the Jets. Rodgers is definitely worth more to NY if he plays more than one year. If either side was willing to do whatever the deal would already be done. Conditional picks seems like a reasonable way for the Packers to get value and the Jets to mitigate risk and for everyone to get a trade done that they want to happen. Win/win

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


Wasn't asking for 4 1st round picks , just one and I would want this years pick. I get the idea of negotiating, but Jets came calling for a 4 time MVP QB and granted a older one. Once he's on your team he's your issue not ours . if we don't get multiple picks with at least one first rounder , then I would say we got fleeced ! The picks in 24 in my opinion will be at the back end of the draft and less valuable than this year , that's why I would prefer this years picks!
msiris
RealGM
Posts: 10,133
And1: 1,676
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Central Wisconsin

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#278 » by msiris » Sun Mar 19, 2023 2:41 pm

The 13th pick will not give them a chance at a superowl next year
. Arod will.
Ride the tank
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 60,876
And1: 25,840
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#279 » by paulpressey25 » Sun Mar 19, 2023 3:08 pm

The fact we’re a few days into this, and no resolution makes me think this thread will be like the “Ramon Sessions Watch” thread from summer of 09.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,660
And1: 3,011
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Aaron Rodgers to the Jets Thread: Packers Aren't Seeking Multiple Firsts 

Post#280 » by MVP2110 » Sun Mar 19, 2023 4:02 pm

msiris wrote:The 13th pick will not give them a chance at a superowl next year
. Arod will.


The Packers aren't a Superbowl contender next year with or without Aaron Rodgers
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"

Return to Green Bay Packers