Post#1572 » by Hal14 » Fri May 12, 2023 3:51 pm
Thinking about the roster a little bit more after last night's game:
I think our top 7 guys are all coming back.
-Tatum is obviously back
-JB ain't going nowhere. He's signing that supermax deal. Him and Tatum are brothers - you can clearly see the bond they have.
Brad's job is to get JB signed to that extension. Then, just continue to put the right pieces around the Jays.
The right pieces are guys who can either shoot it really well, pass it really well, can be a lob threat, can handle the ball as a secondary ball handler / additional offensive creator, or a really good defender. Those 5 things, the more of those things you can do, the better. We need at least 3 (4 or 5 is even better) shooters on the floor at all times.
-Smart isn't going anywhere. As someone else pointed out on here, we don't have enough guys with a ton of toughness, grit. That fearlessness he plays with, the way he puts his body on the line every game. We need that. Plus he's a great defender, good passer, and also comes up with some big buckets for us to help take the pressure of the Jays. He's been here 9 years, great chemistry (on and off the court) with the Jays.
-Al. The leadership he brings. The IQ he plays with. The defensive versatility. The shooting he brings as a big. The way he makes the right basketball play. His experience, playing in the league for a million years. Very valuable piece. He might not be a starter anymore (beginning next season) but if he doesn't start anymore, we know he'll be a very valuable player off the bench
-White. Also fits that mold of "always makes the right basketball play" and plays unselfishly, moves the ball, finds the open man. Can score (from 3 or on drives) but his first priority when he has the ball is finding an open teammate (same with smart, usually). Plus, awesome defender. Not going anywhere. Whether he starts or comes off the bench, he's a valuable piece. Pencil him in for someone around 27-30 mins a game
-Rob. yes, we all wish he could be more durable. But he's on a team-friendly contract. Hopefully, a full offseason of rest and treatment will result in a healthier rob next season. Just try to not go too crazy with his mins next year (I'm thinking 27-29 mins a game. Hopefully he can handle that) and he should be back in the starting lineup. Good passer. Elite lob threat and elite defender, rim protector. So he definitely checks a bunch of boxes in terms of things that you need to be a good team.
-Brogdon. Perhaps the most replaceable member of the top 7 (especially given his contract which is kind of expensive and perhaps you move him for a PF/C (someone who can play next to either Rob or Al). But I lean towards keeping him, because he brings so many things that help this team. Mainly, the shooting. His outside shooting has been so good and so consistent all season - a sniper like that is a must next to the Jays. Plus, he's probably our best ball handler, other than Tatum. That secondary ball handler, secondary offensive creator + shooting is a good complimentary piece. Decent enough defender (really showed something last night on that play where he was switched onto Embiid, he fought like hell to not let Embiid score) and is just a veteran. A proven vet who can produce in this league. A true professional, on and off the court. He had other options but chose to come here - and has said tons of positive things in interviews about being here.
You bring back those 7 guys. Then just try to fill out the rest of the roster as best you can.
Pritchard - he's gone. He wants out, obviously. Trade him - get the best return you can
Hauser - he's probably back. The shooting at that size is valuable. Plays unselfishly, moves the ball, doesn't over-dribble, doesn't hold onto it. Holds his own on D. He's more than likely back as a 9th/10th man. But who knows, if you can put him in a package for someone better, go ahead and do it. He's 25 (turns 26 later this year) so probably not going to get much better. If he can't get minutes in the playoffs now, will he be good enough to get mins in the playoffs ever? Mine as well keep him, though. Dirt cheap contract, gets along great with the guys, good guy for vibes. You need wings off the bench.
Grant - he might be gone. IDK. On one hand, the way the CBA works, it lends itself to resigning your own players. So it's not so easy to just say "Oh, instead of giving Grant $15 mil a year, let's sign a better player with that $15 mil a year". No, we don't have $15 mil a year to spend. But we can spend it on Grant. So on one hand, I say keep him - good shooter, decent defender, strong as hell physically, tough as hell. Meshes well with this core, especially Tatum (those 2 seem very close, obviously). But the shooting can be inconsistent, the defense can be inconsistent, mouths off to the refs too much, sometimes got in trouble trying to do too much off the dribble and as a result, not getting many mins in the playoffs. For a guy who's not even really in the playoff rotation, how much will Brad pay him - maybe $12 mil a year? What if another team (one that isn't as deeper or talented as we are) is willing to offer him $18 mil a year, since that team can give him more of a role. Perhaps he signs elsewhere - perhaps we try to get something for him in that scenario with a S&T, even if it's just to score a TPE and/or pick(s).
Champagnie - assuming he'll be on our summer league team. will be interesting to see how he plays compared to how Begarin plays. I can see 1 of them getting one of the last roster spots - but not both. We'll know more in summer league but I like Champagnie. He was more known for his defense and rebounding coming out of college, but in the g league this season he averaged 19 PPG at age 21. I don't know if anyone has averaged that many points in the g league before at such a young age. So there's potential there.
Gallo - IDK. Part of me thinks that at age 34, coming off a 2nd ACL surgery, his career might be pretty much over. He might not play another meaningful minute in the league. We'll see. He's got a player option for like $6 mil so obviously he'll exercise it. But Brad could trade him. Thing is, no team is gonna trade for a 34 yr old coming off their 2nd ACL surgery. So you're pretty much stuck with him. Just hope he can contribute something next season and then after that he either retires or maybe signs on a minimum deal (here or somewhere else).
Kornet - good guy for the vibes, his sense of humor helps to keep everyone loose. Brad loves him. But he's just not that good. I guess we can keep him as an emergency depth big man. But if you can replace him with someone better (who's a big, or maybe a different position) then go ahead and do it. Out of the things we need in a supporting player (shooting, elite defense, good secondary ball handler / secondary offensive creator, really good passer, really good lob threat) Kornet doesn't really give you any of those things. Muscala at least gives you really good shooting. Griffin doesn't really give you any of them either. Both Kornet and Griffin are good for the vibes. At least Kornet is a decent lob threat, which gives vertical spacing. Griffin gives some hustle/toughness/grit.
So IDK. I think between Kornet, Griffin and Muscala, you bring back 1 or 2 of them. I doubt all 3 of them are back - especially with Gallo likely returning. Perhaps you get rid of 1 or 2 of them so you can sign a different big who checks more of the boxes that we need in a supporting player.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything
