MettaWorldPanda wrote:AirP. wrote:CrossOver wrote:
A trade for Beal/Porzingis would basically require all of Miami's decent sized tradeable contracts (outside of Caleb/Jovic)
These trades don't happen because the team can usually get more per piece in individual trades.
Exactly. This is just spit ball fan lore. I thought about this same deal a few hours ago then completely back tracked off of it. It's better for us to just keep Herro for his age and salary compared to Beal and just add Porzingis. This deal has zero regard for the massive tax penalties and cap restrictions in the future.
One could argue that the trading for Porzingis with intent to sign him to an even larger deal is what really has no regard for the massive tax penalties and cap restrictions in the future.
I like the fit with Bam and in a vacuum, I love adding Porzingis. But, the reality is that he wants to generate the majority of his offense in the paint so there's an inherent sacrifice in his game and diminution of net offensive impact if he's forced to become just a spot up floor spacer for the majority of his minutes on the floor--see Brook Lopez in MIL after being a 20+ ppg scorer. The question becomes viability of dedicating a huge chunk of salary cap to such a role.















