yosemiteben wrote:Have thought a lot about it and I think what bothered me most about Miller at first is still my biggest issue - he looks like a skinny, below the rim player that isn't strong enough to create in ISO situations or off the dribble or to be a plus POA defender. If I saw more athleticism or strength I'd be less concerned.
I'd add that I'm also not impressed with his handles. I think it all limits his upside inside the 3pt line against bigger stronger faster defenders, despite added space. It's not end of world and can be improved. I just think people need to be less excited about those parts of his game. The value is 3pt shooting, length, rangy defender, solid connector as passer.
I think it's fair to say he still has a high floor as a result, but I fail to see him hitting that high end comp of perennial All NBA guy.
He will no doubt add value as Hayward replacement and better version of oubre, at very least.
I do think it's possible that 3,4 years from now he's still only 3rd best player on team behind melo and miles. But I feel confident in him being no worse than that either.
Scoot to me is the bigger wildcard. His floor is lower, but I think his ceiling is higher.
Both 3pt shooters, rim pressure and playmaker are tremendously valuable. We need all 3, big time. It would be great if one player. Scoot or Miller could eventually provide at least two of those 3 things.
Sent from my SM-G973U using
RealGM Forums mobile app