Chris Livingston is a big shooting guard/wing with a lot of burst and above the rim ability. He didn’t have the most productive season at Kentucky but has really good tools and still has a lot of upside to grow into.
He has really good athleticism and an NBA body with broad shoulders, very good upper body strength and a lot of speed.
Livingston is at his best in a fast paced game and he’s a nightmare to defend when he gets the ball in the open court. He’s got lateral agility, an attacking style and he plays above the rim with ease. He’s got a creative layup package with hang time, up and under’s and the ability to finish through contact.
Livingston is bouncy when jumping off of one foot or two and can bring the house down with his dunking ability.
Isn’t yet much of a 3pt shooter. Has decent touch around the rim and from the line and should develop into a capable floor spacer in time.
Livingston doesn’t always show the best body language, something that needs to be cleaned up if he’s going to excel at the next levels.
Needs to work on finishing with hi
#58 - Chris Livingston
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
- M-C-G
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,527
- And1: 9,854
- Joined: Jan 13, 2013
-
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
- M-C-G
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,527
- And1: 9,854
- Joined: Jan 13, 2013
-
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
craig wrote:"Please don't draft my client because somebody else promised to draft my client." Not sure I get the "draft promise" logic.
I can see for an old team like Bucks, an agent might figure his guy might have a better chance to fit and get an opportunity within the next few years, I guess.
May also be that agent thought he had a "promise" with somebody else, but it wasn't actually a "promise" and the team broke that conditional promise when somebody else better lasted to their pick.
I'm not sure, maybe the promise was he would be drafted so he didn't withdraw from the draft? Or maybe the promise was that we would keep him on the roster if he stayed in.
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
-
MKE_Beers
- Sophomore
- Posts: 186
- And1: 114
- Joined: Feb 19, 2015
-
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
M-C-G wrote:craig wrote:"Please don't draft my client because somebody else promised to draft my client." Not sure I get the "draft promise" logic.
I can see for an old team like Bucks, an agent might figure his guy might have a better chance to fit and get an opportunity within the next few years, I guess.
May also be that agent thought he had a "promise" with somebody else, but it wasn't actually a "promise" and the team broke that conditional promise when somebody else better lasted to their pick.
I'm not sure, maybe the promise was he would be drafted so he didn't withdraw from the draft? Or maybe the promise was that we would keep him on the roster if he stayed in.
It feels like we would have had to guaranteed him a real roster spot and not a 2 way if his agent was telling other teams not to draft him. Why else do that for the last pick of the draft?
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,072
- And1: 30,066
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
It's possible we told him he'd be rostered. We did the same thing with Kalatzaikis (don't spell check me) and that was clearly a cost-cutting move and to essentially make it easier to open up a cheap roster spot. Unlike Georgios though, Livingston at least has some legit NBA potential.
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
-
Bucksfan28
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,433
- And1: 5,706
- Joined: Nov 15, 2009
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
Bucks drafting Bronny James next year confirmed.
MoreTrife wrote:Love seeing two buffoons have a buffoon competition.
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
-
craig
- Senior
- Posts: 729
- And1: 129
- Joined: Jul 26, 2005
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
1. The "promise" thing, the simplest explanation is that it was the Bucks that made it.
2. But given the uncertainties of the draft and who's available, it's also hypothetically possible that somebody else made a conditional promise. But didn't follow through, because somebody they liked better than Livingston unexpectedly was still on the board?
3. Support for the Bucks having been the team would seem to follow from the story that after working out with us, he stopped working out for other teams.
2. But given the uncertainties of the draft and who's available, it's also hypothetically possible that somebody else made a conditional promise. But didn't follow through, because somebody they liked better than Livingston unexpectedly was still on the board?
3. Support for the Bucks having been the team would seem to follow from the story that after working out with us, he stopped working out for other teams.
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
- sidney lanier
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,249
- And1: 10,490
- Joined: Feb 03, 2012
- Location: where late the sweet birds sang
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
Bucksfan28 wrote:Bucks drafting Bronny James next year confirmed.
If they have the draft position to have a shot at the James Gang package deal, this will have been a very bad season.
"The Bucks in six always. That's for the culture." -- B. Jennings
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
-
midranger
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,919
- And1: 11,634
- Joined: May 12, 2002
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
Lebron/Klutch will be deciding who selects Bronny.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
-
msiris
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,039
- And1: 2,288
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
- Location: Central Wisconsin
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
-
TroyD92
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,737
- And1: 11,393
- Joined: Mar 28, 2013
- Location: Renewed Hope
-
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
msiris wrote:Wont make the team.
Guarantee he will lol. Two way at worst
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
-
chonestown
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,563
- And1: 13,403
- Joined: Mar 13, 2010
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
msiris wrote:Wont make the team.
might be right OTOH might be wrong too early too tell.imo
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
-
MKE_Beers
- Sophomore
- Posts: 186
- And1: 114
- Joined: Feb 19, 2015
-
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
chonestown wrote:msiris wrote:Wont make the team.
might be right OTOH might be wrong too early too tell.imo
This dude is a straight up troll. Look at the Andre Jackson page and you'll see him with the exact same comment.
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
-
msiris
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,039
- And1: 2,288
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
- Location: Central Wisconsin
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
MKE_Beers wrote:chonestown wrote:msiris wrote:Wont make the team.
might be right OTOH might be wrong too early too tell.imo
This dude is a straight up troll. Look at the Andre Jackson page and you'll see him with the exact same comment.
Ride the tank
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
- tedbrogen
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,298
- And1: 3,804
- Joined: Jun 20, 2008
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
If his agent was telling teams not to pick him so the Bucks could take him at 58, that means either a guaranteed contract and/or guaranteed roster spot. Only thing that makes sense.
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
-
mediocrityrules
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,831
- And1: 5,672
- Joined: Nov 27, 2013
-
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
I mean it's pick 58. Do we really care that much? More chance he doesn't work out than does.
Circling calendars since 2021
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
- tedbrogen
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,298
- And1: 3,804
- Joined: Jun 20, 2008
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
mediocrityrules wrote:I mean it's pick 58. Do we really care that much? More chance he doesn't work out than does.
I like they identified a guy they wanted, who seems like he would have gone earlier, but they got him at 58 by promising something.
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
- Badgerlander
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,064
- And1: 7,488
- Joined: Jun 29, 2007
-
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
I have to keep reminding myself that Covid has probably slowed the curve a little on younger guys development
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Spoiler:
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
- mke_design
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,577
- And1: 2,156
- Joined: Mar 09, 2014
-
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
msiris wrote:MKE_Beers wrote:chonestown wrote: might be right OTOH might be wrong too early too tell.imo
This dude is a straight up troll. Look at the Andre Jackson page and you'll see him with the exact same comment.2nd rounder hardly do especially players drafted by the Bucks.
The new CBA makes keeping 2nd rounders a smart decision on cash strapped teams. Expect them both to make it and have 14 on the bench and 3 2-way players.
DavidDunn21 wrote:So please allow me to continue to be the scapegoat for our very rational fears, but just remember that I understand and forgive all of you.
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
- AntetokounmBros
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,258
- And1: 1,281
- Joined: May 26, 2014
-
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
MKE_Beers wrote:chonestown wrote:msiris wrote:Wont make the team.
might be right OTOH might be wrong too early too tell.imo
This dude is a straight up troll. Look at the Andre Jackson page and you'll see him with the exact same comment.
He's just getting in his offseason reps to prepare for next year's posting, that's all.
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
-
Couch Potato
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,111
- And1: 222
- Joined: Jun 01, 2020
Re: #58 - Chris Livingston
msiris wrote:MKE_Beers wrote:chonestown wrote: might be right OTOH might be wrong too early too tell.imo
This dude is a straight up troll. Look at the Andre Jackson page and you'll see him with the exact same comment.2nd rounder hardly do especially players drafted by the Bucks.
Redd and Moute stuck.








